• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
Celebrating our 1,000th edition. The climate news you need
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  FEATURED
EXCLUSIVE: Hydrogen is Up, Pieridae is Out as German Chancellor Preps for Canada Visit August 15, 2022
Historic Climate Bill Passes U.S. House, Goes to Biden for Signature August 15, 2022
BREAKING: U.S. Senate Passes Historic $369B Climate Package August 7, 2022
Researchers Point To ‘Dangerously Unexplored’ Risk of Global Climate Catastrophe August 2, 2022
Koch Network Pressures Manchin, Sinema as Advocates Praise ‘Game Changing’ Climate Deal August 2, 2022
Next
Prev

Ottawa Can’t Predict Emission Cuts from New Methane Controls

November 2, 2020
Reading time: 3 minutes
Primary Author: Compiled by The Energy Mix staff

rasov/pixabay

rasov/pixabay

3
SHARES
 

The federal government is trying out a revamped set of fossil industry incentives to hit its target of reducing methane emissions 40 to 45% by 2025, but at least three environmental groups in Canada and one in the United States say Ottawa could get better results if it just regulated the companies’ emissions.

The stakes are high, because methane is 84 times more potent a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide over the 20-year span when humanity will be scrambling to reduce emissions and get the climate crisis under control. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau committed to the 2025 target in June 2016, during a summit with then-Mexican president Enrique Peña Nieto and U.S. President Barack Obama. But analysis released by the Pembina Institute in early September concluded the country is only on track for a 29% reduction.

“The gap to achieving Canada’s 2025 methane reduction target is widening at a time when the federal government should be looking to increase ambition on methane to meet its Paris climate commitment,” said Senior Methane Analyst Jan Gorski. “Canada should act decisively to maintain its position as a global leader both in terms of innovative policy and the application of technology to control methane emissions.”

At the time, The Canadian Press wrote, the latest available data showed methane emissions in 2018 equivalent to 91 megatonnes of carbon dioxide, with almost half coming from the fossil industry.

Last Thursday, Natural Resources Minister Seamus O’Regan announced details of the C$750-million Emissions Reduction Fund the government first set up in late April. He said fossils will have to repay all the money they borrow if they only cut some of their methane output—but will get to keep up to half if they eliminate the emission entirely.

“Any time we are able to help companies reduce emissions, that is a very good investment for Canada and is a very good investment for Canadians,” he said. “It’s an incredibly effective way for us to reach our targets.”

“Methane emission reductions remain one of the most cost-effective ways to mitigate climate impacts and additional efforts, such as this fund, will enable Canada to maintain momentum in reducing emissions from this powerful greenhouse gas,” Gorski agreed October 23. “This program sets the stage for Canadian leadership in methane abatement technology that will be more in demand as the rest of the world increasingly acts on methane,” resulting in “more high-tech jobs in Canada, and further methane reductions world-wide.”

But last week, Ottawa couldn’t say how much methane the new program will actually cut. Dale Marshall, national program manager at Toronto-based Environmental Defence Canada, said that would be a lot easier if the government could bring itself to regulate the industry, rather than offering it incentives.

“That’s the difference with regulations,” he told CP. “The level of reductions doesn’t depend on industry coming forward with proposals. It ensures that every oil and gas facility is doing what is needed, especially given that these are very, very cost-effective.”

Climate hawks and other analysts have long argued that methane controls are a win all around—they curb emissions of one of the most dangerous and damaging greenhouse gases, but also save the companies money.

On Thursday, Environmental Defence joined up with the Clean Air Task Force, the David Suzuki Foundation, and the U.S. Environmental Defense Fund on a joint release urging Ottawa to get its methane regulations in order before it signs equivalency agreements allowing Saskatchewan and Alberta to manage their own emissions. The Canadian Environmental Protection Act allows the federal government to set equivalency agreements with provinces, territories, or Aboriginal governments to avoid duplication of effort, as long as those jurisdictions’ laws include “provisions that are equivalent to a regulation made under CEPA”.

But that’s precisely the concern the four organizations raise in their release. The groups argue the provincial rules “won’t be as strict as the regulations Canada laid out”, CP says, and that both sets fall short of the 45% target.

The equivalency agreements “may be finalized soon, despite the inadequacy of both the provincial regulations and the federal regulations they will replace,” the release warns. Even after Environment Minister Jonathan Wilkinson said he was “committed to strengthening these measures if required,” the groups say his department “is close to finalizing agreements with Alberta and Saskatchewan as written. These are five-year agreements, and revisiting them before 2025 will be politically difficult once they are finalized.”



in Canada, Climate & Society, Energy Subsidies, Fossil Fuels, Jurisdictions, Legal & Regulatory, Methane, Oil & Gas, Tar Sands / Oil Sands

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

Suncor Energy Plant_Max and Dee Bernt:Flickr
Ending Emissions

Fossils Would ‘Bust the Paris Agreement’ with Inadequate Decarbonization Plans

August 18, 2022
2
Ken Hodge/Flickr
Oil & Gas

No Path for Canadian LNG Exports to Europe, IISD Analysis Concludes

August 18, 2022
3
Steve Jurvetson/flickr
International Security & War

The Other Kind of Climate Change: Even a ‘Limited’ Nuclear War Would Trigger Starvation, Kill Billions

August 18, 2022
75

Comments 1

  1. Greg Allen says:
    2 years ago

    Not only can Ottawa not predict reductions, they can’t even quantify current emissions. Meanwhile, satellite data of methane concentrations in fine detail and real time is available free on line https://pulse.ghgsat.com/ Taxpayers will be paying for fraudulent claims if they believe claims that zero fugitive emissions are achievable with any gas development let alone fracking.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Brocken Inaglory/wikimedia commons

State-Wide Megastorm Driven by Global Heating Could Drench California for a Month

August 15, 2022
1.1k
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Coal_Carbon_Capture_Technology_In_Use.png

Carbon Capture a ‘Dangerous Distraction’, 500 Organizations Warn Canada, U.S.

July 23, 2021
617
TGEGASENGINEERING/Wikimedia Commons

EXCLUSIVE: Hydrogen is Up, Pieridae is Out as German Chancellor Preps for Canada Visit

August 15, 2022
1.1k
Vinaykumar8687/WikimediaCommons

Solar On Track for ‘Staggering’ 30% Growth This Year

August 15, 2022
315
Early stages of construction on the Flamanville 3 nuclear reactor in France

Failing French Nuclear Plants Drive Up Electricity Costs as Heat Waves Cut Production

August 14, 2022
753
rawpixel

Common Medications Foil Body’s Ability to Cope with Hot Weather

August 15, 2022
205

Recent Posts

Suncor Energy Plant_Max and Dee Bernt:Flickr

Fossils Would ‘Bust the Paris Agreement’ with Inadequate Decarbonization Plans

August 18, 2022
2
Ken Hodge/Flickr

No Path for Canadian LNG Exports to Europe, IISD Analysis Concludes

August 18, 2022
3
Steve Jurvetson/flickr

The Other Kind of Climate Change: Even a ‘Limited’ Nuclear War Would Trigger Starvation, Kill Billions

August 18, 2022
75
kris krüg/flickr

Guilbeault Considering Alternatives to Releasing Toxic Tailings into Athabasca River

August 18, 2022
2
Ford F-150 LIghtning

U.S. Utility Plans to Draw Power from Ford Electric Pickups

August 18, 2022
2
power pylons sunrise grid

Midwestern U.S. Grid Investment Supports Massive Increase in Renewables

August 18, 2022
3
Next Post
tarsandsaction/flickr

Biden Win, Pandemic Economy Could End Keystone XL as Trudeau, O’Regan Pledge Pipeline Support

The Energy Mix

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}