• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
Renewables ‘Set to Soar’ with 440 GW of New Installations in 2023: IEA June 4, 2023
Greek Industrial Giant Announces 1.4-GW Alberta Solar Farm, Canada’s Biggest June 4, 2023
Shift to Remote Work Cuts Commutes, Frees Downtown Space for Affordable Housing June 4, 2023
2.7M Hectares Lost, Nova Scotia at Ground Zero in ‘Unprecedented’ Early Wildfire Season June 4, 2023
Is Equinor’s Bay du Nord ‘Delay’ a Cancellation in Slow Motion? June 1, 2023
Next
Prev

$100M Federal Grant Pays Fossils for R&D They Should Fund Themselves, Climate Hawks Contend

October 23, 2020
Reading time: 3 minutes
Primary Author: The Energy Mix staff

Julia Kilpatrick, Pembina Institute/flickr

Julia Kilpatrick, Pembina Institute/flickr

19
SHARES
 

The Trudeau government faced immediate criticism yesterday after re-announcing a four-year, C$100-million budget promise from March 2019 to help the fossil industry commercialize emerging technologies.

The funds will go to the Clean Resource Innovation Network (CRIN), a consortium of 1,700 companies, non-profits, government departments and agencies, researchers, academic institutions, and economic development agencies. CRIN President Joy Romero, who’s also a vice-president at Alberta tar sands/oil sands producer Canadian Natural Resources Ltd., said $80 million out of the federal grant will be devoted to three technology challenges for “high-impact projects with clear paths to commercialization.” The rest will be spent on administration, management, and what the federal government is calling “clean technology ecosystems”.

  • The climate news you need. Subscribe now to our engaging new weekly digest.
  • You’ll receive exclusive, never-before-seen-content, distilled and delivered to your inbox every weekend.
  • The Weekender: Succinct, solutions-focused, and designed with the discerning reader in mind.
Subscribe

The technology competitions “are aimed at creating alternative value-added products, reducing environmental footprints, and exploring new digital solutions for the oilpatch,” BNN Bloomberg writes. “For example, rather than combusting bitumen, generating carbon fibres to create stronger cement and lighter car bodies,” Romero said on a conference call. “There’s also the option to convert greenhouse gases to valuable products like hand sanitizer and soap, our two most basic weapons in the fight to flatten the COVID-19 curve.” [We’re still going to be fighting to flatten the COVID-19 curve in the time it will take CRIN to organize a technology challenge, and for the lucky winners to deliver usable products?—Ed.]

In a release, Ottawa cast the announcement as part of its Innovation and Skills Plan, saying the funds are meant to reduce fossil industry emissions by 100 megatonnes by 2033 and “accelerate the development and adoption of innovative technologies and processes that seek to lower the oil and gas industry’s environmental impacts. By developing groundbreaking cleantech and emission-lowering solutions through collaboration, CRIN will support economic growth and create good, well-paying jobs, with cleaner energy from source to end use as the result.”

But Julia Levin, climate and energy program manager at Toronto-based Environmental Defence, said the government is setting taxpayers up to fund projects the industry should be paying for on its own.

“Looking over the lists of themes, all of these are ways to save oil and gas companies money, and things they should be paying out for their own pockets—not the pockets of taxpayers,” she told The Energy Mix in an email. When the subsidy was first announced in the 2019 budget, “our reaction was to point out the hypocrisy in the government’s reaffirmed commitment to phasing out fossil fuel subsidies (a commitment first made in 2009), and then offer new handouts. We also noted that this type of funding in the past has failed to deliver concrete and significant GHG reductions from the sector.”

The “tech themes” CRIN lists on its website seems to reinforce Levin’s point: they include reducing the carbon intensity of fuels, digital oil and gas technology, low-emissions value-added products, novel hydrocarbon expansion, new approaches to land and wellsite cleanups, methane controls, and water technology development.

“Using limited public resources to achieve outcomes (like reduced GHG emissions) that could be better achieved through regulatory means is a poor use of public funds,” Levin said, “and is still a transfer of public funds to private oil and gas companies.”

Greenpeace Canada Senior Energy Strategist Keith Stewart agreed the money would be better spent on renewable energy projects. “Calling it cleantech can’t hide the fact that this is still about expanding oil production at a time when we need to be putting people to work on real climate solutions,” he told BNN Bloomberg.



in Canada, Climate & Society, Community Climate Finance, Energy Politics, Energy Subsidies, Jurisdictions, Oil & Gas, Tar Sands / Oil Sands

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

sunrise windmill
International Agencies & Studies

Renewables ‘Set to Soar’ with 440 GW of New Installations in 2023: IEA

June 5, 2023
145
Pixabay
Solar

Greek Industrial Giant Announces 1.4-GW Alberta Solar Farm, Canada’s Biggest

June 4, 2023
130
Oregon Department of Transportation/flickr
Cities & Communities

Shift to Remote Work Cuts Commutes, Frees Downtown Space for Affordable Housing

June 5, 2023
85

Comments 3

  1. Brian Wark says:
    3 years ago

    What about the $3.5 Billion in tax credits for oil R&D every year. Look for financial post article that talks about it. None of the R&D is ever deployed since it cuts into profits.

    Reply
  2. Karen says:
    3 years ago

    After reading this story I decided to write my own letter to PM Trudeau, asking why my tax dollars are contributing to Clean Resource Innovation Network (CRIN). While I’m not against public funding of non-profits, government departments and agencies, researchers, and academic institutions, I am infuriated that grossly profitable petroleum corporations are gifted with my tax dollars!

    I would love to know who the 1700 companies are. Is there a link to this information? I would truly appreciate any further information on them.

    Reply
    • Mitchell Beer says:
      3 years ago

      Thanks Karen. I don’t see a membership list on their website, but you’ll find other information here: https://cleanresourceinnovation.com .

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

/MaxPixels

‘Substantial Damage’, No Injuries as Freight Train Hits Wind Turbine Blade

May 25, 2022
14.6k
sunrise windmill

Renewables ‘Set to Soar’ with 440 GW of New Installations in 2023: IEA

June 5, 2023
145
Natural Resources Canada

2.7M Hectares Lost, Nova Scotia at Ground Zero in ‘Unprecedented’ Early Wildfire Season

June 4, 2023
167
Pixabay

Greek Industrial Giant Announces 1.4-GW Alberta Solar Farm, Canada’s Biggest

June 4, 2023
130
Oregon Department of Transportation/flickr

Shift to Remote Work Cuts Commutes, Frees Downtown Space for Affordable Housing

June 5, 2023
85
Clairewych/Pixabay

Demand Surges for Giant Heat Pumps as Europe Turns to District Heating

June 4, 2023
87

Recent Posts

nicolasdebraypointcom/pixabay

Factor Gender into Transportation Planning, IISD Analyst Urges Policy-Makers

June 4, 2023
39
moerschy / Pixabay

Federal Climate Plans Must Embrace Community-Driven Resilience

June 4, 2023
54
debannja/Pixabay

Austin, Texas Council Committee Backs Fossil Non-Proliferation Treaty

June 4, 2023
89
Equinor

Is Equinor’s Bay du Nord ‘Delay’ a Cancellation in Slow Motion?

June 1, 2023
877
Ottawa Renewable Energy Co-op/Facebook

‘Hinge Moment’ for Humanity Demands ‘YIMBY’ Mentality: McKibben

June 1, 2023
79
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rachel_Notley

Notley Would Have Backed Carbon Capture Subsidies, Smith Less Certain: Ex-Pipeline Exec

June 1, 2023
100
Next Post

Carbon release set off Earth’s biggest extinction

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}