• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
Celebrating our 1,000th edition. The climate news you need
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  FEATURED
BREAKING: U.S. Senate Passes Historic $369B Climate Package August 7, 2022
Researchers Point To ‘Dangerously Unexplored’ Risk of Global Climate Catastrophe August 2, 2022
Koch Network Pressures Manchin, Sinema as Advocates Praise ‘Game Changing’ Climate Deal August 2, 2022
Coastal GasLink Cost Skyrockets 70% to $11.2B August 2, 2022
Ottawa Releases Regulatory ‘Frame’ for Net-Zero Grid by 2035 August 2, 2022
Next
Prev

Federal Nuclear Funding Announcement a ‘Dirty, Dangerous Distraction’, 30 Groups Warn

October 21, 2020
Reading time: 3 minutes

Nuclear Jordan/Facebook

Nuclear Jordan/Facebook

49
SHARES
 

A collection of 30 local, regional, and national public interest organizations from across the country is rallying against next-generation nuclear power development after the federal government announced a C$20-million infusion for the industry tied to its 2050 net-zero emissions target.

In a statement released yesterday, the groups describe (somewhat) small modular reactors as “a dirty, dangerous distraction from tackling the climate crisis,” adding that “nuclear energy is not green, not clean, too costly, and too slow to build.” Citing a Canadian study that concluded SMRs will be up to 10 times as expensive as renewable energy—with renewables and battery storage costs still falling fast—they say Ottawa “is trying to save the nuclear industry rather than saving the environment and protecting health.”

Last week, Innovation Minister Navdeep Bains announced a C$20-million grant to Oakville, Ontario-based Terrestrial Energy to help it commercialize its version of an SMR. CBC says the dollars will preserve 186 jobs and create 52 co-op placements.

“By helping to bring these small reactors to market, we are supporting significant environmental and economic benefits, including generating energy with reduced emissions, highly-skilled job creation, and Canadian intellectual property development,” Bains said.

CBC cites three “major uses” that Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd. is touting for SMRs—helping utilities replace the power produced by coal plants when they close, heating and powering off-grid mines and tar sands/oil sands facilities, and replacing diesel in remote communities.

The public interest groups brought together by the announcement cite a U.S. study that showed solar producing six times more jobs than nuclear per gigawatt-hour electricity produced. And they dispute Natural Resources Minister Seamus O’Regan’s curious notion that there’s no path to net-zero carbon emissions without nuclear. “A new study of 123 countries over 25 years found that countries that invested in renewable energy lowered their carbon emissions much more than those reliant on nuclear energy,” they write.

The groups also take issue with any sense that SMRs are safe.

“The new ‘small’ reactors, proposed to be built across Canada, will produce radioactive waste of many kinds,” they write. “Some of the proposed models would extract plutonium from irradiated fuel, worsening concerns about weapons proliferation and creating new forms of radioactive waste that are especially dangerous to manage. The federal government currently has no detailed policy or strategy for what to do with radioactive waste, and no design or location for a deep underground repository where industry proposes to store high-level radioactive waste for hundreds of thousands of years.”

CBC has O’Regan promising a federal review to make sure its radioactive waste program meets the “highest international standards.”

“We do have to make sure Canadians trust the power system,” he said. “SMR technology allows us to minimize the amount of waste, and in some cases has the potential to recycle nuclear waste.”

Late last year, Rocky Mountain Institute Chair and Chief Scientist Amory Lovins argued the continuing pursuit of a nuclear option actually makes the climate crisis worse by blocking faster uptake of cheaper options. Last month, Mycle Schneider, Paris-based author of the annual World Nuclear Industry Status Report, said no version of an SMR will be in place to generate electricity before 2030—the IPCC deadline for humanity to reduce global greenhouse gas emissions by 45%.

“The industry is actually selling PowerPoint reactors, not detailed engineering, and it’s not the first time. They’ve been doing this for decades,” Schneider told The Energy Mix. “Nobody, not even industry, pretends they can produce anything before 2030.”



in Canada, Clean Electricity Grid, Climate Action / "Blockadia", Community Climate Finance, Energy / Carbon Pricing & Economics, Energy Subsidies, Health & Safety, International Security & War, Jobs & Training, Off-Grid, Sub-National Governments

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

Bernard Spragg/flickr
Energy Politics

$12.3B in Profit over 3 Months as Big Fossils Reject Federal Emissions Cap

August 11, 2022
208
Σ64/Wikimedia Commons
Hydrogen

Global Push for Hydrogen Sidesteps Knowledge Gaps on Climate Impacts

August 11, 2022
234
Protect The Planet
Pipelines / Rail Transport

Trans Mountain Work Site Blocks Early Salmon Run on Coquihalla River, Local Observers Say

August 11, 2022
332

Comments 4

  1. angela bischoff says:
    2 years ago

    Excellent overview with the best links. Thank you Energy Mix!

    Reply
    • Mitchell Beer says:
      2 years ago

      Thank you Angela! (And thanks OCAA for carrying this flag for so many years while most of the rest of us were focused on other battles.)

      Reply
  2. Brian Beaton says:
    2 years ago

    Dirty Dangerous Distraction (DDD) Nuclear Reactors are just another way for the Federal government to continue protecting the status quo of maintaining their subsidies for oil and gas industries while claiming to be funding these technologies that MIGHT be built in the 2030’s and MIGHT work (ie. they are just “powerpoint reactors” as you wrote in a previous article). Rather than fund real Climate Action today these new nuclear reactors are just another way to pay for the expensive government lobbyists and staff to produce more plans and maybe build something that might work sometime in the future. In the case of Terrestrial Energy who received this initial $20 MILLION, this includes Stephen Harper, FORMER PRIME MINISTER OF CANADA and Michael Binder, Ph.D., FORMER PRESIDENT AND CEO, CANADIAN NUCLEAR SAFETY COMMISSION (https://www.terrestrialenergy.com/about-us/advisors/). It is Canada’s latest Nuclear PONZI SCHEME to avoid doing the required decommissioning and waste management work that is required to be done NOW.

    Reply
    • Mitchell Beer says:
      2 years ago

      Nice catch, Brian. Also Ernest Moniz, former U.S. energy secretary during Obama’s second term, and a few other major luminaries.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Bernard Spragg/flickr

$12.3B in Profit over 3 Months as Big Fossils Reject Federal Emissions Cap

August 11, 2022
208
Σ64/Wikimedia Commons

Global Push for Hydrogen Sidesteps Knowledge Gaps on Climate Impacts

August 11, 2022
234
Protect The Planet

Trans Mountain Work Site Blocks Early Salmon Run on Coquihalla River, Local Observers Say

August 11, 2022
332
François GOGLINS/wikimedia commons

Corrosion Problem Shutters Half of France’s Nuclear Reactors

August 2, 2022
1.5k
Joseph Brent/Flickr

Green Hydrogen Will Cost Less than Fossil-Fuelled ‘Blue’, Shell CEO Admits

August 7, 2022
746
Early stages of construction on the Flamanville 3 nuclear reactor in France

Failing French Nuclear Plants Drive Up Electricity Costs as Heat Waves Cut Production

August 8, 2022
451

Recent Posts

Focus Blame for Climate Change on Fossils and Governments, Ecoanalytics Advises

August 11, 2022
108
TheKurgan/Wikipedia

Ontario Pension Giant May Be Getting the Memo on Fossil Divestment, Members Say

August 11, 2022
33
@stan_sdcollins/Twitter

Stranded Communities Hope for Emergency Food Supplies as Newfoundland Wildfires Rage

August 11, 2022
14
Maurizio Pesce/Wikimedia Commons

Tesla Lobbying Points to Ontario as Possible EV Manufacturing Site

August 11, 2022
34
MENA/Flickr

Ontario Gains from U.S. EV Tax Credit, But Plans No Incentives for Local Drivers

August 11, 2022
37
Twitter

Shelling of Ukraine’s Zaporizhzhia Plant Raises Fears for Nuclear Safety

August 11, 2022
32
Next Post
tpsdave/Pixabay

Millions Face ‘Uninhabitable Hell’ if Emissions Aren’t Reduced, UN Agency Warns

The Energy Mix

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}