• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
Danske Bank Quits New Fossil Fuel Financing January 23, 2023
Extreme Warming Ahead Even as Worst-Case Scenarios Grow ‘Obsolete’ January 23, 2023
Notley Scorches Federal Just Transition Bill as Fossil CEO Calls for Oilsands Boom January 23, 2023
IRON OXIDE: New Battery Brings Long-Duration Storage to Grids, 750 Jobs to West Virginia January 23, 2023
BREAKING: GFANZ Banks, Investors Pour Hundreds of Billions into Fossil Fuels January 17, 2023
Next
Prev

U.S. Presidential Candidates’ Debate Includes 10-Minute Segment on Climate Change

October 2, 2020
Reading time: 5 minutes
Primary Author: Compiled by Mitchell Beer @mitchellbeer

Eric Haynes /Data For Progress

Eric Haynes /Data For Progress

12
SHARES
 

It took a terrifying and dangerous Donald Trump shout-out to a band of white nationalist thugs to draw attention away from one of the most notable moments in the U.S. presidential candidates’ debate Tuesday night: At 10:17 PM Eastern, moderator Chris Wallace kicked off a 10-minute question-and answer segment on climate change.

The last time that happened in a presidential debate was in 2008, Grist reported.

  • The climate news you need. Subscribe now to our engaging new weekly digest.
  • You’ll receive exclusive, never-before-seen-content, distilled and delivered to your inbox every weekend.
  • The Weekender: Succinct, solutions-focused, and designed with the discerning reader in mind.
New!
Subscribe

“I’d like to talk about climate change,” Wallace said. “So would I!” replied Democratic nominee Joe Biden, before Wallace turned his attention to Trump. “What do you believe about the science of climate change, sir?” he asked. “Do you believe that human pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, contribute to climate change?”

Click here for our Special Report on climate and the U.S. election.

From there, “the roughly 10 minutes the candidates spent talking about climate change were not only surprisingly extensive, thoughtful, and civil, they represented one of the most substantive conversations President Trump has ever been forced to have about climate change on the fly, and on such a big platform,” Grist writes.

That exchange convinced veteran climate journalist Emily Atkin, publisher of the excellent Heated newsletter [subs here], that “climate change may actually be Trump’s greatest debate weakness. And here’s why: Trump just doesn’t know what to say. A huge reason [Tuesday] night’s debate was such a train wreck was because Trump could not stop interrupting every five seconds. But during the 11-minute climate portion, Trump was weirdly silent. He barely interrupted Biden or Wallace the entire time. This means Trump hasn’t figured out how to deal with tough questions about his climate record (other than saying he likes ‘clean air and water’) or statements of fact about climate change.

Although climate wasn’t on the list of discussion topics published in advance of the debate, Wallace had a solid list of Climate 101 questions for both candidates. “Over your four years, you have pulled the U.S. out of the Paris climate accord. You have rolled back a number of Obama environmental records. What do you believe about the science of climate change, and what will you do over the next four years to confront it?” he asked Trump.

Trump replied that he wants “crystal clean water and air” and claimed the U.S. has done “phenomenally” in reducing its greenhouse gas emissions. “But I haven’t destroyed our businesses. Our businesses aren’t put out of commission,” he told Wallace. “If you look at the Paris Accord, it was a disaster from our standpoint.”

Wallace tried a couple of times to tie Trump down on the basics of climate science—that the atmosphere is warming, and human activity is the primary cause. “Do you believe human greenhouse gas emissions contribute to the global warming of this planet?” he asked. “I think to an extent, yes,” Trump said. “But sir, if you believe in the science of climate change, why have you rolled back the Obama Clean Power Plan, which limited carbon emissions in power plants?” the moderator insisted. “Because it was driving energy prices through the sky,” the former reality TV star inaccurately replied.

Trump repeatedly blamed poor forest management for the epic wildfires sweeping the U.S. west coast, just weeks after California Natural Resources Secretary Wade Crowfoot tried to school him on the connection between the climate crisis and the fires. “The forest floor is loaded up with dead trees,” Trump told Wallace. “You drop a cigarette in there the whole forest burns down.”

Biden used his time to tout his $2-trillion climate action plan, with Trump claiming and Biden accurately denying that the Democratic platform endorses a $100-trillion endorsement in the Green New Deal. But under the Democrats’ plan, “nobody’s gonna build another coal-fired plant in America,” Biden said. “They’re gonna move to renewable energy.”

Biden “sought to portray himself as a champion of renewable energy, while at the same time also attempting to distance himself from the Green New Deal, even though that proposal has informed his sweeping plan to spend $2 trillion on green initiatives, an idea that is likely to gain little traction in Congress,” the New York Times writes.

Several publications pointed to the nearly unique moment of having a series of climate change questions included in a U.S. presidential debate, with the implication that the climate crisis is no longer seen as a niche or second-tier topic.

“Climate change is usually an orphan issue,” Rice University history professor Douglas Brinkley told the Times. “The fact that it got raised at all last night is showing that it’s starting to get some of the national stature it deserves and is no longer just a niche Democratic left concern.”

Like all the rest of the debate, the climate segment “got contaminated by the insult-mania, with answers kind of ricocheting all over the place and the public not getting a clear view of how we are going to attack this crisis,” Brinkley added. “But it’s a good opportunity for moderators to prepare for it to come up in the next two debates, to try to calm the babble and get more coherent answers” from the candidates [or at very least from the one out of the two who’s capable of being calm or coherent—Ed.].

As for the distinction between niche and mainstream issues, an average of 76% of U.S. adults want to hear more about the candidates’ plans to confront the climate crisis, according to a survey conducted over the summer by the Yale University Program on Climate Change Communication that included extensive breakdowns by specific issues and by state.

“Climate change is only one of a number of pressing issues for Americans as they go to the ballot box this year,” The Independent writes. “However, a study by the Pew Research Center in April found that the number of Americans who say global climate change is a major threat to the country jumped from 44% around a decade ago to 60% in 2020.”

Continue Reading



in Climate & Society, Ending Emissions, Energy Politics, Jurisdictions, Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion, United States

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

United Nations
Air & Marine

Salvage of $20B ‘Floating Time Bomb’ Delayed by Rising Cost of Oil Tankers

January 27, 2023
4
RL0919/wikimedia commons
Finance & Investment

Danske Bank Quits New Fossil Fuel Financing

January 23, 2023
2.1k
@tongbingxue/Twitter
Ending Emissions

Extreme Warming Ahead Even as Worst-Case Scenarios Grow ‘Obsolete’

January 23, 2023
262

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

RL0919/wikimedia commons

Danske Bank Quits New Fossil Fuel Financing

January 23, 2023
2.1k
@tongbingxue/Twitter

Extreme Warming Ahead Even as Worst-Case Scenarios Grow ‘Obsolete’

January 23, 2023
262
Rachel Notley/Facebook

Notley Scorches Federal Just Transition Bill as Fossil CEO Calls for Oilsands Boom

January 23, 2023
250
Weirton, WV by Jon Dawson/flickr

IRON OXIDE: New Battery Brings Long-Duration Storage to Grids, 750 Jobs to West Virginia

January 23, 2023
492
James Vincent Wardhaugh/flickr

Canada Sidelines Ontario’s Ring of Fire, Approves Separate Mining Project

December 4, 2022
374
TALL ORDER -- A field of “Freedom” giant miscanthus on Mississippi State University’s South Farm towers over research agronomist Brian Baldwin. Baldwin’s 12-year study of grassy feedstocks indicates the plant is a viable resource for biofuel production. (Photo by MSU Ag Communications/Scott Corey)

Bamboo-like Crop Could Cut U.S. Midwest Warming by 1°C

May 4, 2022
958

Recent Posts

United Nations

Salvage of $20B ‘Floating Time Bomb’ Delayed by Rising Cost of Oil Tankers

January 27, 2023
4
EcoAnalytics

Albertans Want a Just Transition, Despite Premier’s Grumbling

January 23, 2023
186
Sergio Boscaino/flickr

Dubai Mulls Quitting C40 Cities Over ‘Costly’ Climate Target

January 24, 2023
84
hangela/pixabay

New UK Coal Mine Faces Two Legal Challenges

January 24, 2023
43

Gas Stoves Enter U.S. Climate Culture War, Become ‘Bellwether’ for Industry

January 22, 2023
72
Jeff Hitchcock/flickr.

BREAKING: GFANZ Banks, Investors Pour Hundreds of Billions into Fossil Fuels

January 23, 2023
493
Next Post
epicioci/Pixabay

Canada Signs G20 Energy Statement that Endorses Fossil Bailouts, Never Says the Word ‘Climate’

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}