• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
BREAKING: Devastating Impacts, Affordable Climate Solutions Drive IPCC’s Urgent Call for Action March 20, 2023
Historic Deal Reopens B.C. Indigenous Territory to Fracking, Promises Land Restoration March 19, 2023
Repsol Abandons Plan to Ship Canadian LNG to Europe March 17, 2023
Biden Approves $8B Oil Extraction Plan in Ecologically Sensitive Alaska March 14, 2023
U.S. Solar Developers Scramble after Silicon Valley Bank Collapse March 14, 2023
Next
Prev

In Conversation: Decisions on Canada’s Green Recovery Could Still Go Either Way, Petrevan Says

July 23, 2020
Reading time: 4 minutes
Primary Author: Mitchell Beer @mitchellbeer

Sarah Petrevan

Sarah Petrevan

1
SHARES
 

Sarah Petrevan is Policy Director at Clean Energy Canada, and one of the key climate advocates monitoring Ottawa’s progress toward a just, green recovery. With Canadians waiting and watching to see what form that recovery will take, she shares her latest assessment of where the discussion stands.

The Energy Mix: How would you assess the federal government’s approach so far to a green and just recovery?

  • The climate news you need. Subscribe now to our engaging new weekly digest.
  • You’ll receive exclusive, never-before-seen-content, distilled and delivered to your inbox every weekend.
  • The Weekender: Succinct, solutions-focused, and designed with the discerning reader in mind.
Subscribe

Petrevan: It’s challenging to assess their approach, because we haven’t seen a recovery package yet. But what have we seen?

On one hand, Canada still feels very much like it’s in crisis mode. Things are slightly more relaxed than they were in March or April, but even as the economy opens in various places and stages, we’re now seeing spikes [in COVID-19 infections] in certain parts of the country. Things don’t feel like they’re back to normal. We haven’t seen a large recovery package, or any recovery package, because we’re still dealing with the more immediate challenges around wages and people being out of jobs, particularly in sectors like tourism and hospitality.

On the other hand, all the right signals we would look for are there. The government has maintained its commitment to a price on carbon. They’ve maintained their commitment to the Clean Fuel Standard. And we’re also seeing green strings on certain relief packages, like the requirement for climate disclosure in the Large Employer Emergency Financing Facility (LEEFF) bridge financing program. Those all point in the right direction. But we haven’t seen a full economic recovery package yet, and it’s uncertain when that might change.

The Mix: We are seeing releases like the recent Energy Policy Tracker that reported C$16 billion in potential fossil relief in Canada, compared to only $300 million for clean energy. But it’s just potential relief, because there isn’t enough transparency around Export Development Canada to track the actual spending. What does that say about the shape of the recovery?

Petrevan: It’s really uncertain. There isn’t a lot of information out there, and we can’t assess Canada’s package, because we haven’t seen it yet. I think everyone is trying to piece together what’s going on because there’s an information vacuum. And when a vacuum is created, people are left trying to figure out what’s going on and why.

The Mix: We’ve been hearing that there’s fairly strong support in government for green recovery measures, but caution about a second wave of the pandemic. At the same time, we’re starting to see some pointed criticism that they’re being too hesitant. What process and timing do you see ahead?

Petrevan: It’s obvious the government doesn’t feel like it’s ready to move forward with a package, and who knows whether that will change by September? But I will say that, through the sheer course of operation, the government is going to have to deliver a budget at some point. We haven’t yet had a 2020 budget. We had an economic statement last week, but that really only focused on the size of the crater left by the pandemic, and there will need to be a budget. Maybe we’ll see things come out then, but I really have no insight into what they’re thinking timing-wise.

The Mix: What are the other factors either holding things up or pushing the process forward?

Petrevan: That’s a good question, and certainly others are speculating about it. Here, again, when there’s a vacuum, when there’s a lack of detail and perhaps some growing anxiety and uncertainty, the vacuum gets filled with lots of different things and people conclude what they want to conclude.

The Mix: We’re also hearing that the fossil industry is none too pleased with the pace and structure of the COVID-19 supports they’ve been offered. At this point, would you say Ottawa is favouring one set of industries over the other, or is everything just moving very slowly?

Petrevan: I don’t know that it’s fair to say they’re favouring one sector over another. A lot of sectors are hurting across the country, and certainly oil and gas wouldn’t be the only one saying the support programs aren’t targeted enough towards them or don’t meet their needs. From a government policy perspective, it’s challenging to come up with a one-size-fits-all approach: you need policies to be as streamlined as possible, but there are all sorts of unique sectors and work situations around the country. Despite any misgivings about what a green recovery package might look like, you do have to give the federal government credit for coming up with fast and quick and robust relief packages that meet the majority of people’s needs, even if they’re not 100% of what everyone would want if they were to design it themselves.

The Mix: Is there anything you’d like to add?

Petrevan: It’s uncertain times, and I like everybody else would love to know what’s going on and see Canada lead with a stimulus package that addresses the future challenges in the economy as a result of this pandemic, with principles like equality in mind. At the same time, I also want to see an economic recovery package that puts Canada on the path to having a strong economy in the future that reflects our commitments to our 2030 targets and achieving net-zero by 2050. I think there’s a possibility we’ll take the opportunity to do that, and there’s a risk that we won’t.

Follow-up: @cleanenergycan, @sarahcpetrevan



in Canada, Climate & Society, Community Climate Finance, Ending Emissions, Energy Politics, Jobs & Training, Jurisdictions

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

IFRC Intl. Federation:Twitter
International Agencies & Studies

BREAKING: Devastating Impacts, Affordable Climate Solutions Drive IPCC’s Urgent Call for Action

March 20, 2023
491
EcoFlight
First Peoples

Historic Deal Reopens B.C. Indigenous Territory to Fracking, Promises Land Restoration

March 19, 2023
386
U.S. Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement/flickr
Oil & Gas

Willow Oil Project in Alaska Faces Legal Challenges, Economic Doubts

March 19, 2023
167

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

IFRC Intl. Federation:Twitter

BREAKING: Devastating Impacts, Affordable Climate Solutions Drive IPCC’s Urgent Call for Action

March 20, 2023
491
U.S. Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement/flickr

Willow Oil Project in Alaska Faces Legal Challenges, Economic Doubts

March 19, 2023
167
@davenewworld_2

Keystone Pipeline Safety Worries Lawmakers after TC Energy Ordered to Reduce Operating Pressure

March 19, 2023
161
EcoFlight

Historic Deal Reopens B.C. Indigenous Territory to Fracking, Promises Land Restoration

March 19, 2023
386
Rebecca Bollwitt/flickr

Fossils Stay ‘Oily’, Gibsons Sues Big Oil, U.S. Clean Energy Booms, EU Pushes Fossil Phaseout, and Fukushima Disaster was ‘No Accident’

March 14, 2023
293
David Dodge, Green Energy Futures/flickr

U.S. Solar Developers Scramble after Silicon Valley Bank Collapse

March 14, 2023
558

Recent Posts

Wikimedia Commons/Humans of Vanuatu

Six Countries Call for Fossil-Free Pacific

March 19, 2023
28
Wikipedia

Fossil Funding Makes Indigenous Resource Network a ‘Propaganda Machine’, Opponent Says

March 19, 2023
39
moerschy / Pixabay

Planetary Weight Study Shows Humans Taking Most of Earth’s Resources

March 19, 2023
18
Environmental Defence Canada/flickr

Repsol Abandons Plan to Ship Canadian LNG to Europe

March 18, 2023
294
U.S. Bureau of Land Management/flickr

Biden Approves $8B Oil Extraction Plan in Ecologically Sensitive Alaska

March 14, 2023
146
EcoAnalytics

Canadians Want Strong Emissions Cap Regulations, Not More Missed Targets

March 14, 2023
156
Next Post
Steen Jepsen/Pixabay

Renewable Generation Beats Out Fossil Electricity in EU First

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}