• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
Celebrating our 1,000th edition. The climate news you need
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  FEATURED
EXCLUSIVE: Hydrogen is Up, Pieridae is Out as German Chancellor Preps for Canada Visit August 15, 2022
Historic Climate Bill Passes U.S. House, Goes to Biden for Signature August 15, 2022
BREAKING: U.S. Senate Passes Historic $369B Climate Package August 7, 2022
Researchers Point To ‘Dangerously Unexplored’ Risk of Global Climate Catastrophe August 2, 2022
Koch Network Pressures Manchin, Sinema as Advocates Praise ‘Game Changing’ Climate Deal August 2, 2022
Next
Prev

Litigation Drives Global Policy Change on Climate, Study Shows

July 14, 2020
Reading time: 4 minutes
Primary Author: David Thomas

Dutch Court Decision. Credit: Chantal Bekker

Dutch Court Decision. Credit: Chantal Bekker

21
SHARES
 

Recent high-profile legal cases have marked a sea change in climate litigation, showing that the courts are becoming an increasingly effective venue for driving international action on climate change. 

In its annual snapshot of global climate litigation, the London School of Economics examined a spate of climate change cases occurring between May 2019 to May 2020 in which courts around the world ruled in favour of climate action. Around the beginning of the millennium, this type of lawsuit was rare, with only a handful of cases filed worldwide. But over the 20 years since, 1,600 lawsuits were filed, with 1,200 cases recorded in the United States alone. 

Report co-authors Joana Setzer and Rebecca Byrnes—both analysts at UK’s Grantham Research Institute—say this growing catalogue of cases has been accompanied by major changes in legal strategy, with litigators making increasingly bold appeals to human rights and constitutional law. In one high-profile case tried last December, the Dutch Supreme Court upheld the verdict in the 2015 Urgenda Foundation v The State of the Netherlands case, insisting that the nation’s government must move faster to combat carbon emissions.  

The 2019 verdict reinforced one of the main lessons that litigators drew from the original Urgenda case—that a human rights argument can yield a successful result in a climate case.

The momentum of the Dutch Supreme Court decision has carried on into the current year. In January 2020, one month after the Netherlands verdict, a Swiss judge acquitted a dozen young climate protestors of trespassing charges—a ruling that was greeted with cheers and a standing ovation in the courtroom. 

That case dated back to 2018, when the protestors staged a mock tennis match in a Credit Suisse branch to draw attention to the bank’s fossil fuel investments. The stunt was meant to call out Swiss tennis star Roger Federer for his sponsorship deal with the bank, and to ask that he withdraw from his contract as an act of solidarity. 

While they acknowledged the defendants had committed a legal infraction by occupying the Credit Suisse branch, the defence team said the protestors’ actions were justified by the “imminent danger” of the climate crisis. The court accepted the argument, ruling that the protestors’ conduct was a “necessary and proportional” response to the immense scale of the crisis at hand.

“It was an exceptional ruling,” said defence lawyer Aline Bonard, especially after her clients openly admitted to trespassing. After the success of the strategy, she added, “there is bound to be a new wave of legal proceedings using a similar line of argument.”

Now, the LSE report leaves little doubt that Bonard’s prediction is coming true, as novel forms of climate litigation arise worldwide. 

In one of the most ambitious cases documented in the report, lawyers in Colombia have begun to build a new model of jurisprudence around the concept of the “rights of nature”. It mirrors the notorious Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad decision—in which U.S. courts granted corporations the same legal rights as individuals—by arguing that the Colombian Amazon should be enfranchised as a rights-bearing subject.

Though the “rights of nature” argument is particularly ambitious, say Setzer and Byrnes, it is still representative of trends at large, as governments and NGOs become increasingly inclined to view law courts as “collaborators in the regulatory process”.

In China, for example, courts routinely support government-led efforts to mitigate climate change. In South Africa, courts not only enforce existing legislation but also help establish new climate goals by mandating that existing legislation takes new considerations into account. 

In light of these recent milestones, Setzer and Byrnes conclude that—when used in conjunction with other methods—climate litigation shows considerable promise as a regulatory tool. Notably, the success rate of climate litigators is high, with positive climate policy outcomes identified in 58% of non-U.S. cases. 

The sheer volume of climate cases itself also seems to be exerting useful pressure on courts and regulatory bodies. The LSE report shows that even when climate lawsuits are unsuccessful, they can deliver positive long-term impacts by laying the foundations for future legal narratives, or by eliciting a strong dissenting decision from the bench.

Yet despite recounting many positive developments in the field of climate litigation, Setzer and Byrnes also sound a note of caution: any forecasts on the future of climate litigation need to take into account that many of the legal successes of 2019 were secured in a social and political context defined by the youth-led climate protests that swept the globe that year. 

Today, in the wake of COVID-19, the political landscape looks rather different, with governments and media outlets scrambling to address the public health crisis and its economic fallout first and foremost. All the same, Setzer and Byrnes suggest last year’s remarkable run of legal climate wins shows that litigation can play an important role in shaping COVID-19 recovery strategies by acting “as a check on decision-making in the post-COVID-19 recovery.”  

Over the months ahead, they conclude, climate litigators and activists will likely refocus their arguments and renew their efforts. “Understanding the impacts of climate litigation will help to inform how it can be best used to hold governments and companies to account about their efforts to ensure a safer and more sustainable world after the COVID-19 pandemic,” they write.



in Africa, Asia, China, Climate Action / "Blockadia", Ending Emissions, International Agencies & Studies, Legal & Regulatory, South & Central America, UK & Europe

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

TGEGASENGINEERING/Wikimedia Commons
Energy Politics

EXCLUSIVE: Hydrogen is Up, Pieridae is Out as German Chancellor Preps for Canada Visit

August 15, 2022
1
/Pikist
United States

Historic Climate Bill Passes U.S. House, Goes to Biden for Signature

August 15, 2022
2
Vinaykumar8687/WikimediaCommons
Ending Emissions

Solar On Track for ‘Staggering’ 30% Growth This Year

August 15, 2022
1

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Early stages of construction on the Flamanville 3 nuclear reactor in France

Failing French Nuclear Plants Drive Up Electricity Costs as Heat Waves Cut Production

August 14, 2022
614
François GOGLINS/wikimedia commons

Corrosion Problem Shutters Half of France’s Nuclear Reactors

August 2, 2022
1.7k
Σ64/Wikimedia Commons

Global Push for Hydrogen Sidesteps Knowledge Gaps on Climate Impacts

August 11, 2022
347
Muramasa/Wikimedia Commons

Newfoundland Wind Farm Would Power Coastal Green Hydrogen Plant

July 17, 2022
720

Focus Blame for Climate Change on Fossils and Governments, Ecoanalytics Advises

August 11, 2022
154
Bernard Spragg/flickr

$12.3B in Profit over 3 Months as Big Fossils Reject Federal Emissions Cap

August 11, 2022
291

Recent Posts

TGEGASENGINEERING/Wikimedia Commons

EXCLUSIVE: Hydrogen is Up, Pieridae is Out as German Chancellor Preps for Canada Visit

August 15, 2022
1
/Pikist

Historic Climate Bill Passes U.S. House, Goes to Biden for Signature

August 15, 2022
2
Brocken Inaglory/wikimedia commons

State-Wide Megastorm Driven by Global Heating Could Drench California for a Month

August 15, 2022
3
Vinaykumar8687/WikimediaCommons

Solar On Track for ‘Staggering’ 30% Growth This Year

August 15, 2022
1
UK Black Tech/wikimedia commons

U.S. Tech Workers Leaving High-Paying Jobs to Focus on Climate Crisis

August 15, 2022
1
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Arctic Warms 4 Times Faster than Global Average, Surpassing Estimates 

August 15, 2022
1
Next Post
MaxPixel

Coal-Dependent Jakarta Sees Air Quality Worsen During Lockdown

The Energy Mix

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}