• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
Celebrating our 1,000th edition. The climate news you need
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  FEATURED
BREAKING: U.S. Senate Passes Historic $369B Climate Package August 7, 2022
Researchers Point To ‘Dangerously Unexplored’ Risk of Global Climate Catastrophe August 2, 2022
Koch Network Pressures Manchin, Sinema as Advocates Praise ‘Game Changing’ Climate Deal August 2, 2022
Coastal GasLink Cost Skyrockets 70% to $11.2B August 2, 2022
Ottawa Releases Regulatory ‘Frame’ for Net-Zero Grid by 2035 August 2, 2022
Next
Prev

Momentum Builds for Canadian Climate Accountability Act, Long-Term Carbon Targets

June 21, 2020
Reading time: 3 minutes
Primary Author: Compiled by The Energy Mix staff

kelly8843496 / Pixabay

kelly8843496 / Pixabay

75
SHARES
 

Momentum for Canadian climate accountability legislation is beginning to build, with campaigners laying out five pillars for a federal accountability act, a national think tank arguing the benefits of legislated milestones, and a CBC News analysis laying out how such a law might work in practice.

On CBC, Parliamentary reporter Aaron Wherry was out last week with a look at the legally-binding carbon reduction targets the Liberal Party platform promised in last fall’s federal election. The promise came after what Wherry adds up as nine national climate targets over the last 32 years—none of which the country actually met. So legislating the commitment “surely couldn’t hurt,” he writes, “even if it’s still going to take more than a law to ensure Canada does its fair share to combat climate change.”

During the campaign, the Trudeau Liberals promised to set “legally-binding” targets for 2030 and 2050, informed by input from scientists, economists, and other experts. Eight months and what feels like a century later, “a timeline for legislation depends on when the government decides to turn its attention to matters unrelated to the pandemic,” Wherry notes. But there are already two possible roadmaps on offer: one from a coalition of environmental groups, the other from the new Canadian Institute for Climate Choices (CICC).

The environmental groups, including Climate Action Network-Canada (CAN-Rac), West Coast Environmental Law, Équiterre, Environmental Defence, and the Pembina Institute, lay out five pillars for a climate accountability act that delivers real-world carbon cuts. “We want our government to not just commit to doing its part to fight climate change, but also to deliver on that commitment,” they write. The pillars include:

  • Ambitious carbon reduction targets that move Canada toward its fair-share commitment to a 1.5°C limit on average global warming;
  • Five-year carbon budgets that cap greenhouse gas emissions and distribute emission reductions fairly across the country;
  • Five-year impact reports to Parliament;
  • Planning and reporting requirements for carbon reductions and climate adaptation;
  • An arm’s length expert advisory committee to advise on targets and carbon budgets and independently monitor progress.

In a report earlier this month, the CICC reviews past experience with climate accountability frameworks, acknowledges that long-term targets are tough to achieve, but still argues for accountability measures to clarify pathways and progress in the right direction.

“Accountability frameworks are not a silver bullet,” the institute states. “They cannot guarantee that a jurisdiction achieves its long-term climate objectives (since they cannot bind the actions of future, democratically-elected governments). Nor can they sweep aside the complexity of implementing climate policies across multiple orders of government.”

But “climate accountability frameworks could help Canada to achieve its 2030 and 2050 climate targets. International and domestic experience shows that the transparency and accountability they provide can play an important role in keeping governments on track. If designed well, a national accountability framework could create institutional incentives for coordination and alignment between different orders of government.”

On CBC, Wherry recaps the experience with similar climate legislation in British Columbia and Manitoba—and in the UK, which has emerged as a world model for climate accountability rules. Based on the CAN-Rac and CICC reports, “long-term climate targets would be written into law and clear lines of responsibility for ministers would be established,” he writes. “Neither proposal imagines specific consequences for failing to meet a target—but both would require the government to report regularly on progress toward reducing Canada’s emissions, with oversight provided by an arms-length body or institution.”

While both reports call for a national carbon budget, Wherry points to the environmental groups’ call for sub-national budgets as a key difference.

“In a perfectly rational world, that might be the smart way to structure climate policy in a federation—with each province accepting its fair share of the national goal,” he notes. But “the Trudeau government consistently has side-stepped questions about regional differences and responsibility by focusing on national policy, like the federal carbon price. It’s hard to imagine the Liberals wanting to engage now in long and painful negotiations to set provincial carbon budgets.”

The other challenge is to ensure that any legislation adopted today survives futures changes in government. “But legislation would be one more significant structural support for climate action that any future government would have to contend with—even if only by repealing it,” Wherry writes.

“Accountability frameworks aren’t silver bullets and won’t automatically solve the disconnect between policy and targets,” said Dale Beugin, the institute’s vice president of research and analysis. “They do, however, add a layer of durability. Just as missing a milestone has reputational and political costs, so too would repealing legislation.”



in Canada, COP Conferences, Ending Emissions, Legal & Regulatory, Sub-National Governments

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

Bernard Spragg/flickr
Energy Politics

$12.3B in Profit over 3 Months as Big Fossils Reject Federal Emissions Cap

August 11, 2022
2
Σ64/Wikimedia Commons
Hydrogen

Global Push for Hydrogen Sidesteps Knowledge Gaps on Climate Impacts

August 11, 2022
3
Protect The Planet
Pipelines / Rail Transport

Trans Mountain Work Site Blocks Early Salmon Run on Coquihalla River, Local Observers Say

August 11, 2022
1

Comments 1

  1. Ruth Pickering says:
    2 years ago

    This sounds like good news.

    However, in this item, ” Five-year carbon budgets that cap greenhouse gas emissions and distribute emission reductions fairly across the country;”….. the word “fairly” leaves ‘political space’ for the Federal government to continue to provide Alberta with latitude to do virtually nothing about reducing emissions, certainly not proportionally.

    In ‘political-speak’, it would be easy enough to use ‘fairly’ as equivalent to ‘equally’ which, yet again, would perpetuate the decades-long practice of subsidizing Tar Sands Oil while distributing the emission reduction requirements equally across provinces and territories. ( We cannot forget that the current ‘cap’ on TS production excludes over 100 Mt already! and that taxpayers all over Canada are paying for the TMX, which if completed will be massively increasing emissions!)

    it worries me.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Joseph Brent/Flickr

Green Hydrogen Will Cost Less than Fossil-Fuelled ‘Blue’, Shell CEO Admits

August 7, 2022
690
Early stages of construction on the Flamanville 3 nuclear reactor in France

Failing French Nuclear Plants Drive Up Electricity Costs as Heat Waves Cut Production

August 8, 2022
393
François GOGLINS/wikimedia commons

Corrosion Problem Shutters Half of France’s Nuclear Reactors

August 2, 2022
1.3k
Brian Jeffery Beggerly/Wikimedia Commons

China’s Latest Renewables Plan Could Bridge Global 1.5°C Gap, Expert Says

August 9, 2022
203
openthegovernment.org

BREAKING: U.S. Senate Passes Historic $369B Climate Package

August 8, 2022
372
/MaxPixels

‘Substantial Damage’, No Injuries as Freight Train Hits Wind Turbine Blade

May 25, 2022
5.7k

Recent Posts

Bernard Spragg/flickr

$12.3B in Profit over 3 Months as Big Fossils Reject Federal Emissions Cap

August 11, 2022
2
Σ64/Wikimedia Commons

Global Push for Hydrogen Sidesteps Knowledge Gaps on Climate Impacts

August 11, 2022
3
Protect The Planet

Trans Mountain Work Site Blocks Early Salmon Run on Coquihalla River, Local Observers Say

August 11, 2022
1

Focus Blame for Climate Change on Fossils and Governments, Ecoanalytics Advises

August 11, 2022
3
TheKurgan/Wikipedia

Ontario Pension Giant May Be Getting the Memo on Fossil Divestment, Members Say

August 11, 2022
1
@stan_sdcollins/Twitter

Stranded Communities Hope for Emergency Food Supplies as Newfoundland Wildfires Rage

August 11, 2022
3
Next Post
Koza1983/Wikimedia Commons

Goldman Sachs See Renewable Investment Surging While Fossils Pay Huge Risk Premium

The Energy Mix

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}