• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
Biden Approves $8B Oil Extraction Plan in Ecologically Sensitive Alaska March 14, 2023
U.S. Solar Developers Scramble after Silicon Valley Bank Collapse March 14, 2023
$30.9B Price Tag Makes Trans Mountain Pipeline a ‘Catastrophic Boondoggle’ March 14, 2023
UN Buys Tanker, But Funding Gap Could Scuttle Plan to Salvage Oil from ‘Floating Time Bomb’ March 9, 2023
Biden Cuts Fossil Subsidies, But Oil and Gas Still Lines Up for Billions March 9, 2023
Next
Prev

Momentum Builds for Canadian Climate Accountability Act, Long-Term Carbon Targets

June 21, 2020
Reading time: 3 minutes
Primary Author: Compiled by The Energy Mix staff

kelly8843496 / Pixabay

kelly8843496 / Pixabay

75
SHARES
 

Momentum for Canadian climate accountability legislation is beginning to build, with campaigners laying out five pillars for a federal accountability act, a national think tank arguing the benefits of legislated milestones, and a CBC News analysis laying out how such a law might work in practice.

On CBC, Parliamentary reporter Aaron Wherry was out last week with a look at the legally-binding carbon reduction targets the Liberal Party platform promised in last fall’s federal election. The promise came after what Wherry adds up as nine national climate targets over the last 32 years—none of which the country actually met. So legislating the commitment “surely couldn’t hurt,” he writes, “even if it’s still going to take more than a law to ensure Canada does its fair share to combat climate change.”

  • Concise headlines. Original content. Timely news and views from a select group of opinion leaders. Special extras.
  • Everything you need, nothing you don’t.
  • The Weekender: The climate news you need.
Subscribe

During the campaign, the Trudeau Liberals promised to set “legally-binding” targets for 2030 and 2050, informed by input from scientists, economists, and other experts. Eight months and what feels like a century later, “a timeline for legislation depends on when the government decides to turn its attention to matters unrelated to the pandemic,” Wherry notes. But there are already two possible roadmaps on offer: one from a coalition of environmental groups, the other from the new Canadian Institute for Climate Choices (CICC).

The environmental groups, including Climate Action Network-Canada (CAN-Rac), West Coast Environmental Law, Équiterre, Environmental Defence, and the Pembina Institute, lay out five pillars for a climate accountability act that delivers real-world carbon cuts. “We want our government to not just commit to doing its part to fight climate change, but also to deliver on that commitment,” they write. The pillars include:

  • Ambitious carbon reduction targets that move Canada toward its fair-share commitment to a 1.5°C limit on average global warming;
  • Five-year carbon budgets that cap greenhouse gas emissions and distribute emission reductions fairly across the country;
  • Five-year impact reports to Parliament;
  • Planning and reporting requirements for carbon reductions and climate adaptation;
  • An arm’s length expert advisory committee to advise on targets and carbon budgets and independently monitor progress.

In a report earlier this month, the CICC reviews past experience with climate accountability frameworks, acknowledges that long-term targets are tough to achieve, but still argues for accountability measures to clarify pathways and progress in the right direction.

“Accountability frameworks are not a silver bullet,” the institute states. “They cannot guarantee that a jurisdiction achieves its long-term climate objectives (since they cannot bind the actions of future, democratically-elected governments). Nor can they sweep aside the complexity of implementing climate policies across multiple orders of government.”

But “climate accountability frameworks could help Canada to achieve its 2030 and 2050 climate targets. International and domestic experience shows that the transparency and accountability they provide can play an important role in keeping governments on track. If designed well, a national accountability framework could create institutional incentives for coordination and alignment between different orders of government.”

On CBC, Wherry recaps the experience with similar climate legislation in British Columbia and Manitoba—and in the UK, which has emerged as a world model for climate accountability rules. Based on the CAN-Rac and CICC reports, “long-term climate targets would be written into law and clear lines of responsibility for ministers would be established,” he writes. “Neither proposal imagines specific consequences for failing to meet a target—but both would require the government to report regularly on progress toward reducing Canada’s emissions, with oversight provided by an arms-length body or institution.”

While both reports call for a national carbon budget, Wherry points to the environmental groups’ call for sub-national budgets as a key difference.

“In a perfectly rational world, that might be the smart way to structure climate policy in a federation—with each province accepting its fair share of the national goal,” he notes. But “the Trudeau government consistently has side-stepped questions about regional differences and responsibility by focusing on national policy, like the federal carbon price. It’s hard to imagine the Liberals wanting to engage now in long and painful negotiations to set provincial carbon budgets.”

The other challenge is to ensure that any legislation adopted today survives futures changes in government. “But legislation would be one more significant structural support for climate action that any future government would have to contend with—even if only by repealing it,” Wherry writes.

“Accountability frameworks aren’t silver bullets and won’t automatically solve the disconnect between policy and targets,” said Dale Beugin, the institute’s vice president of research and analysis. “They do, however, add a layer of durability. Just as missing a milestone has reputational and political costs, so too would repealing legislation.”



in Canada, COP Conferences, Ending Emissions, Legal & Regulatory, Sub-National Governments

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

U.S. Bureau of Land Management/flickr
Oil & Gas

Biden Approves $8B Oil Extraction Plan in Ecologically Sensitive Alaska

March 14, 2023
73
David Dodge, Green Energy Futures/flickr
Community Climate Finance

U.S. Solar Developers Scramble after Silicon Valley Bank Collapse

March 14, 2023
105
EcoAnalytics
Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion

Canadians Want Strong Emissions Cap Regulations, Not More Missed Targets

March 14, 2023
79

Comments 1

  1. Ruth Pickering says:
    3 years ago

    This sounds like good news.

    However, in this item, ” Five-year carbon budgets that cap greenhouse gas emissions and distribute emission reductions fairly across the country;”….. the word “fairly” leaves ‘political space’ for the Federal government to continue to provide Alberta with latitude to do virtually nothing about reducing emissions, certainly not proportionally.

    In ‘political-speak’, it would be easy enough to use ‘fairly’ as equivalent to ‘equally’ which, yet again, would perpetuate the decades-long practice of subsidizing Tar Sands Oil while distributing the emission reduction requirements equally across provinces and territories. ( We cannot forget that the current ‘cap’ on TS production excludes over 100 Mt already! and that taxpayers all over Canada are paying for the TMX, which if completed will be massively increasing emissions!)

    it worries me.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Behrat/Wikimedia Commons

Hawaii Firm Turns Home Water Heaters into Grid Batteries

March 14, 2023
331
U.S. National Transportation Safety Board/flickr

$30.9B Price Tag Makes Trans Mountain Pipeline a ‘Catastrophic Boondoggle’

March 14, 2023
155
David Dodge, Green Energy Futures/flickr

U.S. Solar Developers Scramble after Silicon Valley Bank Collapse

March 14, 2023
105
EcoAnalytics

Canadians Want Strong Emissions Cap Regulations, Not More Missed Targets

March 14, 2023
79
U.S. Bureau of Land Management/flickr

Biden Approves $8B Oil Extraction Plan in Ecologically Sensitive Alaska

March 14, 2023
73
Rebecca Bollwitt/flickr

Fossils Stay ‘Oily’, Gibsons Sues Big Oil, U.S. Clean Energy Booms, EU Pushes Fossil Phaseout, and Fukushima Disaster was ‘No Accident’

March 14, 2023
77

Recent Posts

Raysonho/wikimedia commons

Purolator Pledges $1B to Electrify Last-Mile Delivery

March 14, 2023
51
United Nations

UN Buys Tanker, But Funding Gap Could Scuttle Plan to Salvage Oil from ‘Floating Time Bomb’

March 10, 2023
89
Gage Skidmore/Wikimedia Commons

Biden Cuts Fossil Subsidies, But Oil and Gas Still Lines Up for Billions

March 10, 2023
174
jasonwoodhead23/flickr

First Nation Scorches Imperial Oil, Alberta Regulator Over Toxic Leak

March 8, 2023
366
MarcusObal/wikimedia commons

No Climate Risk Targets for Banks, New Guides for Green Finance as 2 Federal Agencies Issue New Rules

March 8, 2023
234
FMSC/Flickr

Millions Face Food Insecurity as Horn of Africa Braces for Worst Drought Ever

March 8, 2023
242
Next Post
Koza1983/Wikimedia Commons

Goldman Sachs See Renewable Investment Surging While Fossils Pay Huge Risk Premium

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}