• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
Celebrating our 1,000th edition. The climate news you need
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  FEATURED
BREAKING: No Public Finance for East Coast LNG Projects, Wilkinson Says July 4, 2022
‘Climate Math Gets Harder’ as Radicalized Supreme Court Upends U.S. Carbon Regulation July 4, 2022
Dire Living Conditions, Climate-Driven Heat Wave Produce Deadliest Human Smuggling Event in U.S. History July 4, 2022
Ex-Fossil Workers Convert Old Oilfields to Solar Farms After ‘Rapid Upskilling’ in Alberta June 29, 2022
London Becomes Biggest City to Sign Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty June 29, 2022
Next
Prev
Home Demand & Distribution Buildings

‘Landmark Decision’ Blocks Fracked Gas Pipeline in New York State

May 18, 2020
Reading time: 3 minutes
Primary Author: Compiled by The Energy Mix staff

Rosemary Oakeshott/Geograph

Rosemary Oakeshott/Geograph

42
SHARES
 

In what Politico is calling a “landmark decision” grounded in New York State’s “sweeping climate law”, Governor Andrew Cuomo’s administration has rejected a permit for the US$1-billion Williams Northeast Supply Enhancement pipeline to supply fracked natural gas to Long Island and New York City.

The state Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) “said the construction of the pipeline in the ecologically sensitive, historically contaminated, and recovering area—particularly near Raritan Bay—would have an unacceptable negative impact on water quality,” the publication reports. “It’s also incompatible with the state’s goal to reduce emissions by 85% from 1990 levels by 2050.”

“New York is not prepared to sacrifice the State’s water quality for a project that is not only environmentally harmful but also unnecessary to meet New York’s energy needs,” said DEC spokesperson Erica Ringewald.

While this isn’t the first regulatory setback for the contentious pipeline, it appears to be the last, NJ Spotlight writes, with a senior executive with Tulsa, Oklahoma-based Williams Co. declaring the company will abandon the project.

“While we continue to believe in the fundamentals of this project, we will not refile in New Jersey or New York at this time,’’ said Laura Creekmur, the pipeliner’s vice president of communications and corporate social responsibility. “The decision to pause this important infrastructure project is unfortunate for the region as the design and construction would have generated valuable economic activity in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, and would have directly and indirectly supported more than 3,000 jobs during the construction period.”

But NJ Spotlight says gas supplier National Grid “acknowledged earlier this month in a submittal that alternatives including enhancement of existing infrastructure combined with energy efficiency and other conservation measures could be sufficient to meet New York’s energy needs.” Politico phrases National Grid’s position a bit differently, reporting that the company had seen the pipeline as the “most reliable option” for shifting new buildings off oil over the next 15 years, but “identified a preferred alternative to the pipeline that involves trucking in more gas and upgrading an existing pipeline system.”

DEC’s regulatory decision cited that report, and also pointed to the need for Williams to bury its pipeline six feet deeper than it had assumed to accommodate transmission cabling for a nearby offshore wind project.

But National Grid’s preferred option “may also run into roadblocks because it requires permits and agreements for new liquefied natural gas infrastructure with Mayor Bill de Blasio’s administration. The mayor has said he won’t support new gas supplies for the city but hasn’t required new construction to go electric, which would cut demand,” Politico says. “Environmental advocates want National Grid to close its forecasted supply-demand gap, which they also question, but with energy efficiency measures, demand response (whereby some customers would switch to fuel oil on the coldest days), and heating electrification.”

Jeff Tittel, director of the New Jersey Sierra Club, cast the DEC decision as a win in the fight to put an end to new fossil fuel projects. “It’s a major breakthrough in the battle against new pipelines,” he said, adding that New York grounding its opposition to the project in its concerns about the climate crisis “is a big sea change”.

“This decision shows that the right things can happen when you work hard and stick to what you know is right,’’ said New Jersey League of Conservation Voters Executive Director Ed Potosnak, who lives near the site where a compressor station for the pipeline would have been built.

The Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA) calls the DEC decision a “victory for ratepayers and taxpayers”, adding that the pipeline was unnecessary and would have cost more than $3 billion to complete.

“The DEC decision recognizes that improved energy efficiency, peak demand management, and more competitive renewable resources can be used to substitute for large, expensive pipeline projects,” IEEFA says, and “the decision also is based on sound economic policy. New York is already achieving its economic growth targets relying on cost-effective alternatives,” with an industrial sector that “ranks first nationwide in energy efficiency, and its commercial sector provides more jobs per unit of energy than many other states. Businesses already know that investing in sustainable solutions improves profitability.”

But NJ Spotlight says the Williams pipeline won’t be the last big fight for climate campaigners in New York and New Jersey. “Many fossil fuel projects continue to move forward in New Jersey, including a 144-megawatt power plant in Kearny to power NJ Transit and Amtrak trains and a proposed 1,200-MW gas plant in North Bergen,” the paper says.



in Buildings, Cities & Communities, Climate Action / "Blockadia", Demand & Efficiency, Ending Emissions, Legal & Regulatory, Oil & Gas, Shale & Fracking, Sub-National Governments, United States

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

United Nations
Air & Marine

Time Running Out, Canada Hanging Back on Emergency Plan to Avert $20B Oil Spill Disaster

July 7, 2022
1
Calgary Climate Hub
Cities & Communities

Calgary Adopts Net-Zero Climate Strategy, Ottawa Endorses Fossil Non-Proliferation Treaty

July 7, 2022
2
Staplegunther/Wikimedia Commons
UK & Europe

EU Adds Gas, Nuclear to Green Finance Taxonomy, Reversing Earlier Vote

July 7, 2022
2

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Wikimedia Commons

BREAKING: No Public Finance for East Coast LNG Projects, Wilkinson Says

July 4, 2022
135
Keith Weller/Wikimedia Commons

U.S. Methane Plan Gives Big Ag a Free Pass

July 4, 2022
40
opinion polling gender green recovery climate action

Conservative Women Far More Likely Than Men to Support Green Transition, EcoAnalytics Research Finds

July 4, 2022
88
angela n./flickr

‘Climate Math Gets Harder’ as Radicalized Supreme Court Upends U.S. Carbon Regulation

July 4, 2022
126
François GOGLINS/wikimedia commons

Corrosion Problem Shutters Half of France’s Nuclear Reactors

June 29, 2022
271
Keith Hirsche

Ex-Fossil Workers Convert Old Oilfields to Solar Farms After ‘Rapid Upskilling’ in Alberta

July 3, 2022
480

Recent Posts

United Nations

Time Running Out, Canada Hanging Back on Emergency Plan to Avert $20B Oil Spill Disaster

July 7, 2022
1
Calgary Climate Hub

Calgary Adopts Net-Zero Climate Strategy, Ottawa Endorses Fossil Non-Proliferation Treaty

July 7, 2022
2
Staplegunther/Wikimedia Commons

EU Adds Gas, Nuclear to Green Finance Taxonomy, Reversing Earlier Vote

July 7, 2022
2
Andrea Schaffer/wikimedia commons

Australia’s New Government Plans Legislated Emissions Cut, EV Incentives

July 7, 2022
1
NatureServe/Flickr

Nature Restoration Without Fossil Phaseout ‘Only Marginally’ Reduces Global Warming

July 7, 2022
1
skeeze / Pixabay

U.S. Looks to Other Options After Supreme Court Undercuts EPA Carbon Rules

July 7, 2022
1
Next Post
Greens MPs/Flickr

COVID-19 Wipes Out Nearly 600,000 U.S. Clean Energy Jobs

The Energy Mix

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}