• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
Biden Approves $8B Oil Extraction Plan in Ecologically Sensitive Alaska March 14, 2023
U.S. Solar Developers Scramble after Silicon Valley Bank Collapse March 14, 2023
$30.9B Price Tag Makes Trans Mountain Pipeline a ‘Catastrophic Boondoggle’ March 14, 2023
UN Buys Tanker, But Funding Gap Could Scuttle Plan to Salvage Oil from ‘Floating Time Bomb’ March 9, 2023
Biden Cuts Fossil Subsidies, But Oil and Gas Still Lines Up for Billions March 9, 2023
Next
Prev

Climate Deniers Step Up to Defend Deeply Flawed Michael Moore Film

May 6, 2020
Reading time: 2 minutes

Deadline Hollywood/Twitter

Deadline Hollywood/Twitter

3
SHARES
 

Condemned by energy and climate specialists as a lazy and out-of-date weave of cherry-picked data and fossil talking points, Michael Moore’s latest film Planet of the Humans is being lauded by climate deniers as proof that the sun should not set on fossil fuels.

“The documentary has been viewed over five million times on YouTube since its release…to coincide with the 50th anniversary of Earth Day,” reports DeSmog Blog. A raft of energy and climate experts have responded with blistering critiques, saying the film is rife with misinformation, fails to “provide context on the benefits of renewable energy and the negative impacts of fossil fuels,” and leans heavily on out-of-date information.

  • The climate news you need. Subscribe now to our engaging new weekly digest.
  • You’ll receive exclusive, never-before-seen-content, distilled and delivered to your inbox every weekend.
  • The Weekender: Succinct, solutions-focused, and designed with the discerning reader in mind.
Subscribe

But that isn’t stopping the climate denial community from jumping onboard.

Among the climate change denying faithful championing the film is the Heartland Institute, a think tank heavily subsidized by colossal fossil ExxonMobil. Heartland was “quick to host a podcast episode dedicated to Moore’s documentary,” during which a contributor “praised it for doing a ‘really good job of ticking off all the downsides’ to renewables, which he claimed were the ‘least efficient way that you can try to generate electricity’,” writes DeSmog.

Also in the cheerleading section: the far-right website Breitbart, which used the film as proof, despite research to the contrary, that the solar and wind industries “pretend to be saving the planet from climate change while consuming more fossil fuels than they save.” 

In the UK, pro-Trump commentator James Delingpole praised the film for showing that “renewable energy is damaging to the landscape and to wildlife and does not reduce the use of fossil fuels,” and for undermining the Green New Deal, thus boosting Republican chances in the U.S. election this fall.

Pro-fossil pundits are also using the film to promote the narrative that “renewable energy is a scam, backed by crony capitalists colluding with environmentalists,” notes DeSmog. When Marc Morano, communications director for CFACT—a woefully named free-market think tank—was asked by Rebel News host Ezra Levant about Moore’s opinion of “billionaires” who are “tricking everyone,” he answered that the filmmaker “sees all the con that they’re doing and who’s profiting and who’s making money.” CFACT itself receives funds from ExxonMobil and the Koch brothers.

In its own coverage, The Guardian observes that the film is “almost entirely devoid of solutions to the existential crisis that its producers say they are deeply concerned about”. While the film, which reportedly took many years to complete, “rightly raises questions about rampant consumption and the planet’s dwindling ecosystems,” the UK-based paper adds, “there’s no evidence that attempts were made to revise its content or its premise as new information became available.”

Continue Reading



in Climate Denial & Greenwashing, Energy Politics, Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion, Oil & Gas, United States

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

U.S. Bureau of Land Management/flickr
Oil & Gas

Biden Approves $8B Oil Extraction Plan in Ecologically Sensitive Alaska

March 14, 2023
102
David Dodge, Green Energy Futures/flickr
Community Climate Finance

U.S. Solar Developers Scramble after Silicon Valley Bank Collapse

March 14, 2023
148
EcoAnalytics
Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion

Canadians Want Strong Emissions Cap Regulations, Not More Missed Targets

March 14, 2023
109

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Behrat/Wikimedia Commons

Hawaii Firm Turns Home Water Heaters into Grid Batteries

March 14, 2023
418
U.S. National Transportation Safety Board/flickr

$30.9B Price Tag Makes Trans Mountain Pipeline a ‘Catastrophic Boondoggle’

March 14, 2023
208
David Dodge, Green Energy Futures/flickr

U.S. Solar Developers Scramble after Silicon Valley Bank Collapse

March 14, 2023
148
EcoAnalytics

Canadians Want Strong Emissions Cap Regulations, Not More Missed Targets

March 14, 2023
109
moerschy / Pixabay

Fringe Conspiracy Theories Target 15-Minute City Push in Edmonton, Toronto

February 22, 2023
1.6k
U.S. Bureau of Land Management/flickr

Biden Approves $8B Oil Extraction Plan in Ecologically Sensitive Alaska

March 14, 2023
102

Recent Posts

Raysonho/wikimedia commons

Purolator Pledges $1B to Electrify Last-Mile Delivery

March 14, 2023
67
United Nations

UN Buys Tanker, But Funding Gap Could Scuttle Plan to Salvage Oil from ‘Floating Time Bomb’

March 10, 2023
91
Gage Skidmore/Wikimedia Commons

Biden Cuts Fossil Subsidies, But Oil and Gas Still Lines Up for Billions

March 10, 2023
181
jasonwoodhead23/flickr

First Nation Scorches Imperial Oil, Alberta Regulator Over Toxic Leak

March 8, 2023
373
MarcusObal/wikimedia commons

No Climate Risk Targets for Banks, New Guides for Green Finance as 2 Federal Agencies Issue New Rules

March 8, 2023
239
FMSC/Flickr

Millions Face Food Insecurity as Horn of Africa Braces for Worst Drought Ever

March 8, 2023
250
Next Post
Thank you for visiting my page/Flickr

Orphan Wells Funding Draws ‘Significantly Higher’ Interest Than Expected

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}