• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
Celebrating our 1,000th edition. The climate news you need
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  FEATURED
BREAKING: UN Nature Summit, the ‘Paris Conference for Biodiversity’, Moves to Montreal in December June 19, 2022
‘LET’S SUE BIG OIL’: Legal Team Launches Class Action Campaign for B.C. Municipalities June 17, 2022
‘It Could Have Been Any of Us’, Colleague Says, After Brazil Confirms Murders of Bruno Pereira, Dom Phillips June 17, 2022
Infrastructure Gap a ‘Life and Death’ Matter as Northern Canada Warms June 17, 2022
Ban Fossil Fuel Ads Like Tobacco Promos, Doctors Urge Ottawa June 10, 2022
Next
Prev
Home Climate & Society Climate Denial & Greenwashing

Climate Deniers Step Up to Defend Deeply Flawed Michael Moore Film

May 6, 2020
Reading time: 2 minutes

Deadline Hollywood/Twitter

Deadline Hollywood/Twitter

3
SHARES
 

Condemned by energy and climate specialists as a lazy and out-of-date weave of cherry-picked data and fossil talking points, Michael Moore’s latest film Planet of the Humans is being lauded by climate deniers as proof that the sun should not set on fossil fuels.

“The documentary has been viewed over five million times on YouTube since its release…to coincide with the 50th anniversary of Earth Day,” reports DeSmog Blog. A raft of energy and climate experts have responded with blistering critiques, saying the film is rife with misinformation, fails to “provide context on the benefits of renewable energy and the negative impacts of fossil fuels,” and leans heavily on out-of-date information.

But that isn’t stopping the climate denial community from jumping onboard.

Among the climate change denying faithful championing the film is the Heartland Institute, a think tank heavily subsidized by colossal fossil ExxonMobil. Heartland was “quick to host a podcast episode dedicated to Moore’s documentary,” during which a contributor “praised it for doing a ‘really good job of ticking off all the downsides’ to renewables, which he claimed were the ‘least efficient way that you can try to generate electricity’,” writes DeSmog.

Also in the cheerleading section: the far-right website Breitbart, which used the film as proof, despite research to the contrary, that the solar and wind industries “pretend to be saving the planet from climate change while consuming more fossil fuels than they save.” 

In the UK, pro-Trump commentator James Delingpole praised the film for showing that “renewable energy is damaging to the landscape and to wildlife and does not reduce the use of fossil fuels,” and for undermining the Green New Deal, thus boosting Republican chances in the U.S. election this fall.

Pro-fossil pundits are also using the film to promote the narrative that “renewable energy is a scam, backed by crony capitalists colluding with environmentalists,” notes DeSmog. When Marc Morano, communications director for CFACT—a woefully named free-market think tank—was asked by Rebel News host Ezra Levant about Moore’s opinion of “billionaires” who are “tricking everyone,” he answered that the filmmaker “sees all the con that they’re doing and who’s profiting and who’s making money.” CFACT itself receives funds from ExxonMobil and the Koch brothers.

In its own coverage, The Guardian observes that the film is “almost entirely devoid of solutions to the existential crisis that its producers say they are deeply concerned about”. While the film, which reportedly took many years to complete, “rightly raises questions about rampant consumption and the planet’s dwindling ecosystems,” the UK-based paper adds, “there’s no evidence that attempts were made to revise its content or its premise as new information became available.”



in Climate Denial & Greenwashing, Energy Politics, Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion, Oil & Gas, United States

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

Jason Woodhead/Flickr
Pipelines / Rail Transport

Trans Mountain Pipeline On Track to Lose $600 Million, Parliamentary Budget Officer Finds

June 24, 2022
314
Ben_Kerckx/Pixabay
Petrochemicals & Plastics

Plastics Cited as ‘Fossil Industry’s Plan B’ as Guilbeault Announces Partial Ban

June 24, 2022
197
Erik Whalen/wikimedia commons
Severe Storms & Flooding

Yellowstone Park Reopens, But Flood Recovery Could Take Years, Cost Billions

June 24, 2022
73

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

The federal government's Cliff Street Power Plant is at the centre of Ottawa's plans to reduce natural gas demand. Photo: PWGSC

EXCLUSIVE: Ontario Regulator Refuses New Pipeline, Tells Enbridge to Plan for Lower Gas Demand

May 30, 2022
5.1k
Ben_Kerckx/Pixabay

Plastics Cited as ‘Fossil Industry’s Plan B’ as Guilbeault Announces Partial Ban

June 24, 2022
197
zephylwer0/pixabay

North American Steel, Aluminium Giants Lumber Toward Green Transition

June 24, 2022
170
Jason Woodhead/Flickr

Trans Mountain Pipeline On Track to Lose $600 Million, Parliamentary Budget Officer Finds

June 24, 2022
314
Bruce Reeve/Flickr

Opinion: Ontario’s New ‘Carbon Tax’ Looks Like the One Doug Ford Fought

June 7, 2022
1.6k
Michael and Diane Weidner/Unsplash

Scientists, Politicians Debate Ethics of ‘Climate Tinkering’

June 7, 2022
74

Recent Posts

Erik Whalen/wikimedia commons

Yellowstone Park Reopens, But Flood Recovery Could Take Years, Cost Billions

June 24, 2022
73
TAFE SA TONSLEY/Flickr

Clean Energy Investment to Exceed $1.4T This Year, Still Falls Short of Climate Goals: IEA

June 24, 2022
95
Nemaska Lithium/Facebook

Critical Minerals, Hydrogen Lead Ottawa’s Low-Carbon Industry Strategy

June 24, 2022
79
Cjp24/Wikimedia Commons

UK Green Shift Won’t Repeat Job Destruction of Deindustrialization, Report Finds

June 24, 2022
37
/PxFul

Canadian Farmers Offer Ottawa a Roadmap to Cut Agriculture Emissions

June 24, 2022
95
Pavlofox/Pixabay

Millions Face Famine as Climate Disasters, Ukraine War Slash Food Supplies

June 24, 2022
51
Next Post
Thank you for visiting my page/Flickr

Orphan Wells Funding Draws ‘Significantly Higher’ Interest Than Expected

The Energy Mix

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}