• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
BP Predicts Faster Oil and Gas Decline as Clean Energy Spending Hits $1.1T in 2022 January 31, 2023
Canada Needs Oil and Gas Emissions Cap to Hit 2030 Goal: NZAB January 31, 2023
Ecuador’s Amazon Drilling Plan Shows Need for Fossil Non-Proliferation Treaty January 31, 2023
Rainforest Carbon Credits from World’s Biggest Provider are ‘Largely Worthless’, Investigation Finds January 31, 2023
Danske Bank Quits New Fossil Fuel Financing January 23, 2023
Next
Prev

Tenth Anniversary of Deepwater Horizon Disaster Shows Few Lessons Learned

April 22, 2020
Reading time: 3 minutes

Deepwater Horizon spill, 2010/Wikipedia

Deepwater Horizon spill, 2010/Wikipedia

36
SHARES
 

Ten years after BP’s Deepwater Horizon oil rig exploded in the Gulf of Mexico, producing the largest oil spill in U.S. history and devastating avian and marine ecosystems as well as local economies, the Trump administration is reneging on safeguards put in place in the disaster’s wake, even as the odds of a worse catastrophe grow larger.

Killing 11 workers and, in the ensuing 90-day oil spill, “an estimated one million birds and countless marine mammals,” the explosion prompted serious regulatory reforms from President Barack Obama, writes The Huffington Post.

  • The climate news you need. Subscribe now to our engaging new weekly digest.
  • You’ll receive exclusive, never-before-seen-content, distilled and delivered to your inbox every weekend.
  • The Weekender: Succinct, solutions-focused, and designed with the discerning reader in mind.
New!
Subscribe

“He vowed to hold responsible parties accountable and implement whatever regulatory reforms were needed to prevent similar disasters,” recalls HuffPost. “The Obama administration divided the Minerals Management Service, a scandal-plagued federal agency that both issued offshore leases and policed drilling operations, into three separate agencies to avoid conflicts of interest.”

That move “was meant to separate safety regulators from government officials who might be more incentivized by the money coming in from taxes on drilling,” The Guardian’s report explains.

Also occurring under Obama’s tenure: the creation of the Marine Well Containment Company, an independent non-profit equipped and “at the ready” to respond to future deepwater well incidents and spills. And in 2016, “the Interior Department’s Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) finalized major offshore drilling safety regulations.”

But on the tenth anniversary of the explosion, little of that preparedness has survived Trump’s “energy dominance” agenda for the U.S. Industry is being pushed “to develop in new, riskier and more expensive areas,” Elizabeth Johnson Klein, the associate deputy secretary for the Interior Department under Obama, told HuffPost. “When companies are forced to cut costs, safety is typically one of the first things to take a back seat.”

Trump’s agenda to date has included weakening notification and certification rules and appointing former Halliburton lobbyist David Bernhardt to the position of Interior Secretary (Halliburton was the oilfield services giant that “agreed to a US$1.1-billion settlement for its role in the 2010 blowout,” notes HuffPost). Other greatest hits include “scrapping a requirement that offshore equipment be designed to withstand the most extreme weather and pressure conditions” and “overhaul[ing] the Well Control Rule, a monitoring regulation that…required additional inspection and maintenance of blowout preventers, devices designed to automatically seal a well and stop an uncontrolled release of oil and gas.”

Those changes have gone along with a Trump-driven tendency for officials to be “accommodating to the corporations they regulate,” reports The Guardian. Internal emails suggest that Scott Angelle, current bureau director of BSEE and a long-time supporter of the oil industry, has “refused to document” the concerns of staffers who “have disagreed with the rollbacks to drilling safety rules,” and has been quoted as saying his organization is making a transition “from creating hardships to creating partnerships”.

With the removal of safeguards, the Trump administration has “plowed ahead with offshore leasing,” writes HuffPost. In March, “as the deadly coronavirus pandemic gripped the nation,” 78 million acres of the Gulf of Mexico were offered up at auction to oil and gas producers. The purchase price for one 400,000-acre stretch: About US$93 million—“the smallest total for an offshore auction since 2016.”

University of Maryland marine scientist Donald Boesch, who in 2011 helped produce a bipartisan commission report into the causes of the Deepwater Horizon explosion and spill, said such actions and events show the Trump administration has failed to learn the “essential” lesson from the disaster: namely, that “industry and government should be putting their greatest energies into preventing operational accidents, blowouts, and releases.” Then, just as today, said Mark Davis, director of the Institute on Water Resources Law and Policy at Tulane University, the U.S. government should not have “a financial stake in the success” of marine fossil fuel projects.

“Until we get our policies and legal architecture in line with the risks we are running, we are going to be very vulnerable,” he warned.

Trump-era pressuring to drill ever farther offshore could also lead to a disaster even worse than Deepwater Horizon, Florida State University oceanographer professor Ian MacDonald told HuffPost. “The worst case scenario for a future oil spill is not loss of exploration well drilling, but the catastrophic destruction of a production platform in deep water,” he said. The ocean floor is known to be unstable and susceptible to earthquakes, he cautioned, and “if a mudflow were to destroy one without warning, we could get a discharge of oil that could continue for years.”



in Biodiversity & Habitat, Energy Politics, Health & Safety, Legal & Regulatory, Oil & Gas, United States, Water

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

Mike Mozart/Flickr
Ending Emissions

BP Predicts Faster Oil and Gas Decline as Clean Energy Spending Hits $1.1T in 2022

January 31, 2023
322
Gina Dittmer/PublicDomainPictures
Canada

Canada Needs Oil and Gas Emissions Cap to Hit 2030 Goal: NZAB

January 31, 2023
196
CONFENIAE
Ending Emissions

Ecuador’s Amazon Drilling Plan Shows Need for Fossil Non-Proliferation Treaty

January 31, 2023
61

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Ken Teegardin www.SeniorLiving.Org/flickr

Virtual Power Plants Hit an ‘Inflection Point’

January 31, 2023
125
Mike Mozart/Flickr

BP Predicts Faster Oil and Gas Decline as Clean Energy Spending Hits $1.1T in 2022

January 31, 2023
322
RL0919/wikimedia commons

Danske Bank Quits New Fossil Fuel Financing

January 23, 2023
2.4k
Doc Searls/Twitter

Guilbeault Could Intervene on Ontario Greenbelt Development

January 31, 2023
132
/snappy goat

Rainforest Carbon Credits from World’s Biggest Provider are ‘Largely Worthless’, Investigation Finds

January 31, 2023
94
Gina Dittmer/PublicDomainPictures

Canada Needs Oil and Gas Emissions Cap to Hit 2030 Goal: NZAB

January 31, 2023
196

Recent Posts

CONFENIAE

Ecuador’s Amazon Drilling Plan Shows Need for Fossil Non-Proliferation Treaty

January 31, 2023
61
Victorgrigas/wikimedia commons

World Bank Climate Reforms Too ‘Timid and Slow,’ Critics Warn

January 31, 2023
42
United Nations

Salvage of $20B ‘Floating Time Bomb’ Delayed by Rising Cost of Oil Tankers

January 27, 2023
121
@tongbingxue/Twitter

Extreme Warming Ahead Even as Worst-Case Scenarios Grow ‘Obsolete’

January 23, 2023
341
Rachel Notley/Facebook

Notley Scorches Federal Just Transition Bill as Fossil CEO Calls for Oilsands Boom

January 23, 2023
313
EcoAnalytics

Albertans Want a Just Transition, Despite Premier’s Grumbling

January 23, 2023
323
Next Post
Wildfire

Wildfire Crews Must Change Tactics, Rethink Camp Hygiene to Prevent COVID-19 Spread

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}