• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
Celebrating our 1,000th edition. The climate news you need
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  FEATURED
BREAKING: U.S. Senate Passes Historic $369B Climate Package August 7, 2022
Researchers Point To ‘Dangerously Unexplored’ Risk of Global Climate Catastrophe August 2, 2022
Koch Network Pressures Manchin, Sinema as Advocates Praise ‘Game Changing’ Climate Deal August 2, 2022
Coastal GasLink Cost Skyrockets 70% to $11.2B August 2, 2022
Ottawa Releases Regulatory ‘Frame’ for Net-Zero Grid by 2035 August 2, 2022
Next
Prev

Scarce Details, ‘Quid Pro Coal’ Undercut Australian State’s 17.7-GW Renewables Plan

March 29, 2020
Reading time: 2 minutes

Jeremy buckingham/Flickr

Jeremy buckingham/Flickr

 

The Australian state of New South Wales has released a new net-zero plan that promises up to 17,700 MW in new wind, solar, and storage capacity, with the potential for up to 2,000 permanent jobs. But the deal carries a quid pro quo with coal, to the dismay of those pushing for rapid climate action.

The 10-year Stage 1 plan, released in mid-March, details how NSW will “leverage A$2 billion/US$1.23 billion in funds secured under a bilateral deal with the Morrison government to accelerate the deployment of the state’s first Renewable Energy Zone,” writes RenewEconomy. The NSW government has “identified a set of core priorities for the next 10 years of energy system development, at the centre of which is…state support [for] increases in wind and solar generation as it deals with the looming exit of its coal generation fleet.”

That exit will hardly occur overnight, RenewEconomy has observed—particularly given that the bilateral deal (described by the Australia Green Party as “a climate deal with the devil” and by RenewEconomy as a “quid pro coal”) involved the Morrison administration “securing a commitment from the New South Wales government to ramp up its fossil fuel industries in return for chipping in funds to support ‘emissions reduction’ activities.” 

About half of the monies pledged under the bilateral deal—around US$626 million—will go into a Coal Innovation Program, which will “support projects that can capture and reuse methane emissions released during coal mining processes, and the commercialization of new technologies.”

In addition to the 17,700 MW of new generation and storage capacity from three pilot renewable energy zones across the state, the plan promises “coordinated investments in transmission network infrastructure that will link the region’s rich wind and solar resources with the rest of the National Electricity Market,” RenewEconomy writes. Such coordination “could work to avoid the grid connection challenges that are currently plaguing some regions within the National Electricity Market, particularly western Victoria, which has seen projects delayed or curtailed to manage constraints within the local network infrastructure.”

In addition to the A$2 billion secured via the bilateral deal, NSW will be “looking to leverage as much as $11.6 billion” in private sector dollars to help deliver on the Stage 1 strategy. The plan’s authors hope the new renewable energy zones could eventually attract more than twice that amount, predicting “as much as $23 billion in private sector investment directed into the renewable energy zones alone, in new energy infrastructure,” RenewEconomy writes. 

But with implementation details put off to “a future date,” Adam Searle, climate and energy spokesperson for the NSW Labor Party, condemned the plan as “weak” and little more than a PR exercise.

“Every element of this package has been announced in the past—they have just been rebadged and repackaged,” he told RenewEconomy. “These measures will not cut emissions by 35% by 2030.” 

The longer state policy-makers delay real action, he added, “the longer it will take to cut emissions and energy bills, and give NSW the massive economic benefits that will come with decarbonizing the economy.”



in Australia, Batteries / Storage, Carbon Levels & Measurement, CCS & Negative Emissions, Clean Electricity Grid, Climate Denial & Greenwashing, Coal, Community Climate Finance, COP Conferences, Ending Emissions, General Renewables, Jobs & Training, Methane, Solar, Wind

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

openthegovernment.org
United States

BREAKING: U.S. Senate Passes Historic $369B Climate Package

August 8, 2022
280
jasonwoodhead23/flickr
Energy Politics

Fossils Dismiss Federal Emissions Cap as ‘Aggressive’, ‘Unrealistic’

August 8, 2022
135
Early stages of construction on the Flamanville 3 nuclear reactor in France
Nuclear

Failing French Nuclear Plants Drive Up Electricity Costs as Heat Waves Cut Production

August 8, 2022
307

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Joseph Brent/Flickr

Green Hydrogen Will Cost Less than Fossil-Fuelled ‘Blue’, Shell CEO Admits

August 7, 2022
590
openthegovernment.org

BREAKING: U.S. Senate Passes Historic $369B Climate Package

August 8, 2022
280
Early stages of construction on the Flamanville 3 nuclear reactor in France

Failing French Nuclear Plants Drive Up Electricity Costs as Heat Waves Cut Production

August 8, 2022
307
David Wilson/wikimedia commons

U.S. State Treasurers Use Public Office to Thwart Climate Action, Investigation Finds

August 7, 2022
133
/MaxPixels

‘Substantial Damage’, No Injuries as Freight Train Hits Wind Turbine Blade

May 25, 2022
5.6k
Green Energy Futures/flickr

Solar Shingle Buying Guide Lays Out Options for Curious Homeowners

August 7, 2022
146

Recent Posts

jasonwoodhead23/flickr

Fossils Dismiss Federal Emissions Cap as ‘Aggressive’, ‘Unrealistic’

August 8, 2022
135
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/

Canadians Share Stories of Fear, Vulnerability from 2021 Heat Dome

August 7, 2022
68
Brian Jeffery Beggerly/Wikimedia Commons

China’s Latest Renewables Plan Could Bridge Global 1.5°C Gap, Expert Says

August 9, 2022
139
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service - Pacific Region/Wikimedia Commons

Australia Bans New Coal Mine to Protect Great Barrier Reef, Faces Call for Full Moratorium

August 7, 2022
78
The Come Up Show/flickr

Celebrities, Influencers See Backlash for Private Jet Emissions

August 7, 2022
63
alexxxis/Pixabay

Cambridge University to Rename BP Institute Following Student Backlash

August 7, 2022
48
Next Post
Pxhere

E-Commerce Giants Produce Lower Emissions, But Fail on Workers’ Respiratory Health

The Energy Mix

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}