• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
SPECIAL REPORT: ‘Defuse the Climate Time Bomb’ with Net-Zero by 2040, Guterres Urges G20 March 20, 2023
Devastating Impacts, Affordable Climate Solutions Drive IPCC’s Urgent Call for Action March 20, 2023
Window for 1.5°C ‘Rapidly Closing’, IPCC Warns March 20, 2023
Swift Action, Inclusive Resilience Vital in Face of Overlapping Climate Hazards March 20, 2023
Shift from Fossils to Renewables is Quickest, Cheapest Path to Cut Emissions, IPCC Report Shows March 20, 2023
Next
Prev

E-Commerce Giants Produce Lower Emissions, But Fail on Workers’ Respiratory Health

March 29, 2020
Reading time: 4 minutes

Pxhere

Pxhere

7
SHARES
 

While e-commerce heavyweights like Amazon generate lower greenhouse gas emissions than traditional bricks-and-mortar shops, online shopping is still producing massive amounts of local pollution, according to a recent report. That in turn is driving higher levels of asthma and other lung diseases—a particularly frightening health risk as COVID-19 continues to spread.

“Large online retailers in the U.S. produce 17% fewer greenhouse gas emissions than traditional stores,” writes Bloomberg Green, reporting on new findings from Generation Investment Management LLP, a sustainable fund management firm co-established by former U.S. Vice President Al Gore. But the study also found that such carbon efficiency is typically measurable “only with businesses operating on a global scale”—such as Amazon and Walmart—because “smaller online companies can be even more emissions-intensive than the traditional shops, particularly if their warehousing isn’t energy efficient.”

  • Be among the first to read The Energy Mix Weekender
  • A brand new weekly digest containing exclusive and essential climate stories from around the world.
  • The Weekender:The climate news you need.
Subscribe

Past studies have also found that overnight or same-day delivery from companies like Amazon more than wipe out the emissions advantage over bricks-and-mortar retail. “There are several factors, not least scale, timing, and customer behaviour, that can tip the scales in the other direction,” Generation Investment Management partner Nick Kukrika told Bloomberg.

And those scales are certainly tipping. “Global e-commerce sales rose from US$2 trillion to $3.5 trillion between 2016 and 2019,” reports Bloomberg, citing Digital Commerce 360 data. In the U.S. alone, e-commerce exchanges have “jumped to 10% of overall retail sales as of 2018 from less than 1% in 2000.”

And COVID-19 is accelerating this transition at whiplash speed, as apprehensive consumers turn to the web for essentials, up to and including groceries.

Retailers are taking some action, however. Bloomberg notes that both bricks-and-mortar and web-based retail giants around the world “have already made commitments on climate change,” with the United Kingdom’s largest grocers, J. Sainsbury and Tesco, pledging to hit net-zero emissions by 2040 and 2050, respectively. Across the pond, Walmart has promised to “source 50% of its energy needs from renewable sources by 2025,” while Amazon has pledged net-zero by 2040. (Though the reaction has not been unanimously positive.)

But meanwhile, the global pandemic is putting the hundreds of thousands of workers at Amazon’s 175 global fulfilment centres in immediate peril. This danger needs to be addressed right now, writes Grist. 

While the unemployed and those “hoping for speedier delivery of essential goods” may welcome the news that Amazon will be hiring 100,000 new warehouse and delivery workers across the U.S. to handle the pandemic-driven surge in online shopping, “some in California’s Inland Empire—a warehouse and logistics hub where Amazon expects to add about 4,000 of those jobs—are concerned that vulnerable communities in their neighbourhoods will suffer as the industry executes a massive speedup,” reports Grist.

“Ranked the worst in the nation for ozone pollution” and “plagued by some of the highest poverty rates,” the Inland Empire will fare very badly should the novel coronavirus arrive in earnest. The impacts of poverty and compromised immune systems already endemic in its residents make it highly likely that any outbreak will be “exceptionally deadly”.

“We know that once [the novel coronavirus] does take hold here, it has the potential to be really, really bad because “the damage has already been done in our communities,” Anthony Victoria Midence, communications director at the Center for Community Action and Environmental Justice (CCAEJ), told Grist. 

Residents are fighting back, however. Andrés García, a life-long asthma sufferer and former Amazon employee, is part of an ongoing protest against a proposed airport logistics centre “that, according to an environmental assessment, would generate one ton of toxic air pollution daily,” writes Grist. The proposed tenant, according to rumour? No less than Amazon itself. 

“As Amazon prepares to add staff and increase activity across the country and in the Inland Empire, Garcia says, the company can take steps to mitigate issues like pollution and protect the health and well-being of workers,” writes Grist. The protesters are insisting on a substantial give-and-take, with Garcia stating that “it should go forward only on the condition that Amazon agrees to a guaranteed set of benefits and working conditions for employees as well as a requirement that it use zero-emission electric trucks.”

To date, workers have tested positive for COVID-19 at more than 10 Amazon fulfillment centres across the United States, suggesting that the company’s immediate response to the pandemic is leaving much to be desired. “Workers in multiple states say Amazon is not doing enough to protect their health and that of their families,” writes Wired. “They say they are scared, that they are not getting information they need.”

One Amazon worker at a Michigan warehouse found out that a co-worker had tested positive “through the grapevine, not via the company itself,” according to the Wired report. 

“I actually resigned, because two of my children and myself have asthma, and it’s not worth it right now to work there,” the worker told the magazine. “Our health comes first, not packages.”



in Buildings, Carbon Levels & Measurement, Cities & Communities, Demand & Efficiency, Ending Emissions, Environmental Justice, Health & Safety, International, Jobs & Training, Supply Chains & Consumption, United States

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

Kern River Valley Fire Info/Facebook
International Agencies & Studies

SPECIAL REPORT: ‘Defuse the Climate Time Bomb’ with Net-Zero by 2040, Guterres Urges G20

March 20, 2023
155
IFRC Intl. Federation:Twitter
International Agencies & Studies

Devastating Impacts, Affordable Climate Solutions Drive IPCC’s Urgent Call for Action

March 21, 2023
693
U.S. National Park Service/rawpixel
International Agencies & Studies

Window for 1.5°C ‘Rapidly Closing’, IPCC Warns

March 20, 2023
46

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

U.S. Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement/flickr

Willow Oil Project in Alaska Faces Legal Challenges, Economic Doubts

March 19, 2023
391
IFRC Intl. Federation:Twitter

Devastating Impacts, Affordable Climate Solutions Drive IPCC’s Urgent Call for Action

March 21, 2023
693
Kern River Valley Fire Info/Facebook

SPECIAL REPORT: ‘Defuse the Climate Time Bomb’ with Net-Zero by 2040, Guterres Urges G20

March 20, 2023
155
Kenuoene/pixabay

Shift from Fossils to Renewables is Quickest, Cheapest Path to Cut Emissions, IPCC Report Shows

March 20, 2023
97
Secretariat of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine/Wikimedia Commons

IPCC Report Charts a Course for Ottawa’s ‘Clean Technology’ Budget

March 20, 2023
81
@davenewworld_2

Keystone Pipeline Safety Worries Lawmakers after TC Energy Ordered to Reduce Operating Pressure

March 19, 2023
251

Recent Posts

U.S. National Park Service/rawpixel

Window for 1.5°C ‘Rapidly Closing’, IPCC Warns

March 20, 2023
46
FMSC/Flickr

Swift Action, Inclusive Resilience Vital in Face of Overlapping Climate Hazards

March 20, 2023
44
Kiara Worth, UNClimateChange/flickr

Gap Between IPCC’s Science, National Actions Sets Challenge for COP 28

March 20, 2023
46
Photo by IISD/ENB

IPCC Sees Deeper Risk in Overshooting 1.5°C Warming Threshold

March 20, 2023
27
EcoFlight

Historic Deal Reopens B.C. Indigenous Territory to Fracking, Promises Land Restoration

March 19, 2023
433
Wikimedia Commons/Humans of Vanuatu

Six Countries Call for Fossil-Free Pacific

March 19, 2023
42
Next Post
African Centre for Advocacy/Twitter

Electricity, Clean Water Hold Keys to Human and Climate Health

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}