• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
Biden Approves $8B Oil Extraction Plan in Ecologically Sensitive Alaska March 14, 2023
U.S. Solar Developers Scramble after Silicon Valley Bank Collapse March 14, 2023
$30.9B Price Tag Makes Trans Mountain Pipeline a ‘Catastrophic Boondoggle’ March 14, 2023
UN Buys Tanker, But Funding Gap Could Scuttle Plan to Salvage Oil from ‘Floating Time Bomb’ March 9, 2023
Biden Cuts Fossil Subsidies, But Oil and Gas Still Lines Up for Billions March 9, 2023
Next
Prev

2018 Pipeline Explosion Near Prince George Revealed “Shocking” Safety Breaches

March 6, 2020
Reading time: 3 minutes

My Prince George Now/Twitter

My Prince George Now/Twitter

47
SHARES
 

The Lheidli T’enneh First Nation has responded to a Transportation Safety Board of Canada (TSB) report on an October 2018 Enbridge pipeline explosion near the community’s borders, saying the report contains “shocking” confirmation of serious safety breaches.

The newly-released findings show that the explosion—which rattled band office windows two kilometres away and forced some 100 people in the community to evacuate—was the result of “stress corrosion cracking,” reports Prince George Matters. In the wake of the report, the Lheidli T’enneh, who filed a lawsuit against Enbridge in February 2019, have reiterated their profound lack of confidence in the pipeliner’s capacity to transport hydrocarbons safely. 

  • Be among the first to read The Energy Mix Weekender
  • A brand new weekly digest containing exclusive and essential climate stories from around the world.
  • The Weekender:The climate news you need.
Subscribe

“My community understandably remains very concerned about Enbridge’s operations through our territory, and for good reason,” said Lheidli T’enneh Chief Dayi Clay Pountney in a news release. Community representatives had been asking for answers from Enbridge about the explosion since it occurred, but had not received an adequate response.

Now, the TSB report has revealed a series of missteps, beginning with Enbridge’s approval of a 2016 request for an inspection deferral that had been scheduled for 2017. TSB investigators were “unable to determine why the standard operating practices were not followed.”

The report also observed that the National Energy Board’s (NEB) March 2013 audit of Westcoast, the Enbridge subsidiary responsible for the pipeline, found the company’s integrity management plan did not “meet the NEB’s expectations for a complete, robust, and fully implemented program.” Also far from adequate were Westcoast’s efforts to consult with the Lheidli T’enneh and others on emergency response protocols. The TSB determined that the Lheidli T’enneh, along with other communities and organizations that were potentially at risk, were not included “in any of Westcoast’s emergency response exercises between 2014 and 2018”.

Such a failure to involve community stakeholders left Lheidli T’enneh residents self-evacuating down the only road out of their community, a road that at one point crosses the pipeline right-of-way, the TSB report says. 

“It is my expectation that decision-makers and investors in Calgary and elsewhere would agree with my community’s assessment that this is unacceptable,” said Pountney. “This does not amount to the safe, world-class transportation of hydrocarbons through our territory.” 

Reporting on Lheidli T’enneh’s lawsuit against Enbridge a month after it was launched in February 2019, the Aboriginal Peoples’ Television Network (APTN) explained that the community had “requested a permanent injunction that would prevent the company from operating the pipeline in their territory and reserves,” and for “the pipeline’s immediate dismantling and removal.” In response, Enbridge posted a statement on its website declaring that it would not be “in the public interest to stop operating a critical piece of energy infrastructure that millions of people in B.C. and the U.S. Pacific Northwest rely on every day.”

That Enbridge went on to restore the broken pipeline to 80% of its operational capacity within a month of the explosion—while still ignorant of the explosion’s precise cause—“appalled” then-Lheidli T’enneh chief Dominic Frederick.

“All anyone could talk about was getting the gas back on,” he told APTN. “They turned it back on without answers and without our consent. They didn’t care about us.” 

Following the explosion, the community was “totally shut out,” said Lheidli T’enneh lawyer Malcolm Macpherson. “They received the odd surface-layer email, but they haven’t been participants in the investigation and that is wrong,” he told APTN. “This pipeline literally blew up in their backyard. Yet they are not involved in the investigation, the gas was turned back on without their consultation, without their participation, and, very importantly, without their consent.”

Macpherson confirmed the lawsuit would be “seeking compensation for damages, nuisance, and trespass, and a declaration that the Lheidli T’enneh First Nation was never consulted on the construction, operation, repair, or return to service of the pipeline.”

In an interview with CBC, Enbridge Senior Vice-President Michele Harradence described the risk of stress corrosion cracks as “a known threat to pipeline integrity,” but said the cracking “grew faster than we anticipated.” 

In an official response to the TSB findings, Enbridge apologized that the 2018 explosion “has caused concerns and disrupted the lives of many people in the area,” reports Kamloops Matters. In its release, the company stated it has “learned from this incident,” and has taken steps to ensure the safety of its natural gas system. 



in Canada, Energy Politics, Environmental Justice, First Peoples, Health & Safety, Legal & Regulatory, Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion, Oil & Gas, Pipelines / Rail Transport, Supply Chains & Consumption

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

Environmental Defence Canada/flickr
Shale & Fracking

Repsol Abandons Plan to Ship Canadian LNG to Europe

March 17, 2023
195
U.S. Bureau of Land Management/flickr
Oil & Gas

Biden Approves $8B Oil Extraction Plan in Ecologically Sensitive Alaska

March 14, 2023
120
EcoAnalytics
Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion

Canadians Want Strong Emissions Cap Regulations, Not More Missed Targets

March 14, 2023
127

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

David Dodge, Green Energy Futures/flickr

U.S. Solar Developers Scramble after Silicon Valley Bank Collapse

March 14, 2023
360
Environmental Defence Canada/flickr

Repsol Abandons Plan to Ship Canadian LNG to Europe

March 17, 2023
195
Rebecca Bollwitt/flickr

Fossils Stay ‘Oily’, Gibsons Sues Big Oil, U.S. Clean Energy Booms, EU Pushes Fossil Phaseout, and Fukushima Disaster was ‘No Accident’

March 14, 2023
187
Joshua Doubek/Wikipedia

No New Jobs Came from Alberta’s $4B ‘Job Creation’ Tax Cut for Big Oil

October 6, 2022
822
U.S. National Transportation Safety Board/flickr

$30.9B Price Tag Makes Trans Mountain Pipeline a ‘Catastrophic Boondoggle’

March 14, 2023
243
Behrat/Wikimedia Commons

Hawaii Firm Turns Home Water Heaters into Grid Batteries

March 14, 2023
445

Recent Posts

U.S. Bureau of Land Management/flickr

Biden Approves $8B Oil Extraction Plan in Ecologically Sensitive Alaska

March 14, 2023
120
EcoAnalytics

Canadians Want Strong Emissions Cap Regulations, Not More Missed Targets

March 14, 2023
127
Raysonho/wikimedia commons

Purolator Pledges $1B to Electrify Last-Mile Delivery

March 14, 2023
84
United Nations

UN Buys Tanker, But Funding Gap Could Scuttle Plan to Salvage Oil from ‘Floating Time Bomb’

March 10, 2023
94
Gage Skidmore/Wikimedia Commons

Biden Cuts Fossil Subsidies, But Oil and Gas Still Lines Up for Billions

March 10, 2023
185
jasonwoodhead23/flickr

First Nation Scorches Imperial Oil, Alberta Regulator Over Toxic Leak

March 8, 2023
376
Next Post

Tropical forests may be heating Earth by 2035

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}