• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
SPECIAL REPORT: ‘Defuse the Climate Time Bomb’ with Net-Zero by 2040, Guterres Urges G20 March 20, 2023
Devastating Impacts, Affordable Climate Solutions Drive IPCC’s Urgent Call for Action March 20, 2023
Window for 1.5°C ‘Rapidly Closing’, IPCC Warns March 20, 2023
Swift Action, Inclusive Resilience Vital in Face of Overlapping Climate Hazards March 20, 2023
Shift from Fossils to Renewables is Quickest, Cheapest Path to Cut Emissions, IPCC Report Shows March 20, 2023
Next
Prev

Skyrocketing Price Drives Down Public Support for Trans Mountain Pipeline Expansion

February 21, 2020
Reading time: 3 minutes

LoggaWiggler / Pixabay

LoggaWiggler / Pixabay

8
SHARES
 

Public support for the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion tips toward opposition when Canadians learn that the cost of the controversial project has ballooned to C$12.6 billion, the Angus Reid Institute reports this week based on a new opinion survey.

“When first asked, 55% support the TMX expansion, a number identical to support found last month,” the non-profit opinion research agency writes. “However, after then being informed of the increase in operational costs associated with it, and the increased taxpayer burden, support drops to 48%, and opposition rises a corresponding seven points. Canadians are now close to equally divided (48% support vs 45% oppose).”

  • The climate news you need. Subscribe now to our engaging new weekly digest.
  • You’ll receive exclusive, never-before-seen-content, distilled and delivered to your inbox every weekend.
  • The Weekender: Succinct, solutions-focused, and designed with the discerning reader in mind.
Subscribe

The finding “represents a two-year low point in support for the project, which stood at 49% in February 2018,” Angus Reid adds. “Opposition has increased 12 points over that same period.”

The poll showed only a minimal shift in Alberta, with support for the project ticking down slightly from 88 to 85%. And the results put an interesting twist on the notion that boomers are the fiscally responsible ones around the family dinner table. “Younger Canadians, ages 18 to 34, lean toward opposition to the TMX after learning of the cost change,” the survey summary states. “Those 35 to 54 years of age are divided, while older Canadians (55+) still offer majority support.”

A separate Nanos Research poll, commissioned by Dogwood B.C. and released Wednesday by Stand.Earth, shows support for the pipeline eroding as the price rises. “Canadians are most likely to say it should not cost taxpayers any money (43%),” while 21% support the project at its current cost of $9.3 billion, 8% are prepared to have it cost $12 billion but no more, and only 16% would pay whatever it costs to complete it.

“Quebecers are more likely to say it should not cost taxpayers any money (59%, compared to 43% of Canadians overall), while Canadians from the Prairies are more likely to say whatever it takes to complete it (27%, compared to 16% of Canadians overall),” Nanos states. “Four in ten Canadians say the government should sell the project to a private company at the best price it can get (40%) and one in three (33%) say the government should build the pipeline with public money,” while “under two in ten (17%) say the government should cancel the project and write off any losses.”

“The pipeline’s shocking new price tag is a game changer for the Trans Mountain project,” said Stand climate and energy campaigner Sven Biggs. “An overwhelming majority of Canadians do not want to spend 12.6 billion taxpayer dollars on an oil pipeline. It’s time to change course before borrowing billions more to ramp up construction, and invest instead in clean energy and direct support for struggling workers in Western Canada.”

“Canadians are increasingly uncomfortable with the burden of debt the government is taking on to finance ballooning construction costs,” added Dogwood Campaigns Manager Alexandra Woodsworth. “And in the middle of an affordability crisis, Canadians don’t want to see their hard-earned tax dollars wasted trying to prop up a white elephant.”

Citing the Nanos poll, three opposition parties joined campaigners’ demand that Ottawa stop work on the pipeline expansion. “Bloc Québécois leader Yves-François Blanchet, NDP environment critic Laurel Collins, as well as the Greens’ parliamentary leader, Elizabeth May, cited a poll on the rising price of the project in a news conference in Ottawa Wednesday,” The Canadian Press reports.



in Canada, Energy Politics, Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion, Pipelines / Rail Transport

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

IFRC Intl. Federation:Twitter
International Agencies & Studies

Devastating Impacts, Affordable Climate Solutions Drive IPCC’s Urgent Call for Action

March 21, 2023
807
U.S. National Park Service/rawpixel
International Agencies & Studies

Window for 1.5°C ‘Rapidly Closing’, IPCC Warns

March 20, 2023
77
Kenuoene/pixabay
Ending Emissions

Shift from Fossils to Renewables is Quickest, Cheapest Path to Cut Emissions, IPCC Report Shows

March 20, 2023
215

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

U.S. Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement/flickr

Willow Oil Project in Alaska Faces Legal Challenges, Economic Doubts

March 19, 2023
537
IFRC Intl. Federation:Twitter

Devastating Impacts, Affordable Climate Solutions Drive IPCC’s Urgent Call for Action

March 21, 2023
807
Secretariat of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine/Wikimedia Commons

IPCC Report Charts a Course for Ottawa’s ‘Clean Technology’ Budget

March 21, 2023
151
Kern River Valley Fire Info/Facebook

SPECIAL REPORT: ‘Defuse the Climate Time Bomb’ with Net-Zero by 2040, Guterres Urges G20

March 20, 2023
263
Kenuoene/pixabay

Shift from Fossils to Renewables is Quickest, Cheapest Path to Cut Emissions, IPCC Report Shows

March 20, 2023
215
NTSB

Ohio Train Derailment, Toxic Chemical Spill Renews Fears Over Canada-U.S. Rail Safety

March 8, 2023
1.5k

Recent Posts

EUMETSAT/wikimedia commons

Cyclone Freddy Leaves Over 500 Dead on Africa’s Southeast Coast

March 23, 2023
8
U.S. National Park Service/rawpixel

Window for 1.5°C ‘Rapidly Closing’, IPCC Warns

March 20, 2023
77
FMSC/Flickr

Swift Action, Inclusive Resilience Vital in Face of Overlapping Climate Hazards

March 20, 2023
70
Kiara Worth, UNClimateChange/flickr

Gap Between IPCC’s Science, National Actions Sets Challenge for COP 28

March 21, 2023
74
Photo by IISD/ENB

IPCC Sees Deeper Risk in Overshooting 1.5°C Warming Threshold

March 20, 2023
48
EcoFlight

Historic Deal Reopens B.C. Indigenous Territory to Fracking, Promises Land Restoration

March 19, 2023
449
Next Post
U.S. Geological Survey/Flickr

Study Shows Governments, Scientists Underestimating Fossils’ Methane Releases by 25-40%

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}