• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
Biden Approves $8B Oil Extraction Plan in Ecologically Sensitive Alaska March 14, 2023
U.S. Solar Developers Scramble after Silicon Valley Bank Collapse March 14, 2023
$30.9B Price Tag Makes Trans Mountain Pipeline a ‘Catastrophic Boondoggle’ March 14, 2023
UN Buys Tanker, But Funding Gap Could Scuttle Plan to Salvage Oil from ‘Floating Time Bomb’ March 9, 2023
Biden Cuts Fossil Subsidies, But Oil and Gas Still Lines Up for Billions March 9, 2023
Next
Prev

False Alarm Draws Attention to Delayed Pickering Nuclear Shutdown, Triggers Surging Demand for Emergency Iodide Pills

January 15, 2020
Reading time: 5 minutes
Primary Author: Compiled by Mitchell Beer @mitchellbeer

Pickering nuclear

Facebook

19
SHARES
 

Millions of people across Ontario woke up in a panic early Sunday morning, after an emergency alert falsely announced an incident at the Pickering nuclear station east of Toronto.

By the time a follow-up message declared the alert a false alarm triggered by a training exercise gone wrong, the episode had produced a surge in local demand for emergency iodide pills, raised serious concerns about the provincial government’s plans to extend the operating life of the 1970s-era nuclear plant, and kindled widespread fears about a potentially calamitous power generation technology that fares best with public opinion when it can stay out of sight, out of mind.

  • Concise headlines. Original content. Timely news and views from a select group of opinion leaders. Special extras.
  • Everything you need, nothing you don’t.
  • The Weekender: The climate news you need.
Subscribe

“The alert was issued province-wide at 7:24 a.m. ET,” CBC reported. An hour to nearly two hours later, “Ontario Power Generation, the plant’s operator, tweeted without explanation that the warning ‘was sent in error’.” But by then, that error had “left people fuming, with scores of Twitter users flooding the OPG’s Twitter feed to share their disgust.”

“This is a completely unacceptable use of the Emergency #Alert System,” Andru Valpy wrote. “You had the entire province waking up in fear.”

“Me and probably a couple million people almost had an aneurysm [because] of that msg,” tweeted a user identified as Alex.

“That’s a really major error,” added Amber Waves. “People with anxiety disorders woke up to this and their health was impacted, never mind everyone else. Unacceptable.”

Pickering-area resident Thomas Perez slept through the alarm, but told CBC he knew what to do when his wife woke him with news of a problem at the nuclear plant.

“As soon as she told me that, I told her ‘Let’s get into the car and get out of here.’ That was my first reaction,” he said. “We woke up the kids, then I came and started heating up the car.”

Even after OPG issued the correction, Perez said his reaction was that “we’d better leave. It’s better to listen the news when we are out, not when we are here, because everybody is going to try to leave at the same time and we’re not going to be able to.” With nothing packed when everyone got in the car, he added, “my main concern was our life.”

Some reports from Pickering had locals picking up the alert, but reasoning that sirens would likely have gone off in a real radiation emergency. But Mayor Dave Ryan was still looking for answers.

“Like many of you, I was very troubled to have received that emergency alert this morning,” he tweeted. “While I am relieved that there was no actual emergency, I am upset that an error such as this occurred. I have spoken to the province, and am demanding that a full investigation take place.” Toronto Mayor John Tory agreed.

Solicitor General Sylvia Jones later apologized for the incident, explaining the alert was “issued in error to the public during a routine training exercise being conducted by the Provincial Emergency Operations Centre.” She added that “there was no incident at the Pickering Nuclear Generating Station that should have triggered public notification. Nor was there ever any danger to the public or environment.”

Despite the all-clear, the false alarm had generated 32,388 orders for potassium iodide (KI) pills by Tuesday. OPG usually receives 100 to 200 orders per month.

In Ontario, the pills “are distributed to residents within 10 kilometres of a nuclear facility; others living within a 50-kilometre radius of one can order them through a website called preparetobesafe.ca,” The Canadian Press explains. “The pills help protect the thyroid gland and reduce the risk of cancer if radioactive iodine is released into the air in the unlikely event of a nuclear emergency, according to the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission. They saturate the thyroid gland with non-radioactive iodine and prevent radioactive iodine from being absorbed.”

Meanwhile, the false alarm collided badly with the Toronto Star’s revelation Monday that the provincial cabinet had met before Christmas and quietly approved extending the aging Pickering plant’s operating licence beyond 2024.

“Opened in 1971, [the facility] employs 4,500 people and generates 14% of Ontario’s electricity from six nuclear reactors. Two other reactors there have been shut down for 22 years,” the Star said. “The previous Liberal government, which had reopened two of the four reactors shut down by its Progressive Conservative predecessor in 1998, announced four years ago the station would go offline by 2024.”

A day later, Energy Minister Greg Rickford said the plant will be phased out gradually, with the last of the reactors shut down within five years. The actual decommissioning process will take 40 years, news reports note.

“The proposal put forward to cabinet from OPG was…an optimization of the decommissioning process,” Rickford said. “It was a phased-in approach that was proposed—one unit at a time over a defined period of time,” and “we’re taking it out for consultation. Elements of it are going to be subject to alterations or amendments to the existing licence, which goes to 2024 at the units that are functioning.”

“This secretive decision by the Ford government puts Ontarians at greater risk, as the Pickering nuclear station is now proposed to be operated over a decade past its best-before date,” responded Greenpeace Canada Program Director and nuclear specialist Shawn-Patrick Stensil. “The short-term electoral calculus may add up, but any transparent economic or risk assessment would opt for replacing this obsolete plant with safe, lower-cost renewable energy.”

Within hours of the alert, the Ontario Clean Air Alliance was out with a reminder that the next Pickering alert could be real.

“Environmental groups have long raised concerns about the inadequacy of emergency plans for this almost 50-year-old nuclear station, including the failure to plan for a Fukushima-scale accident,” wrote OCAA Director Angela Bischoff. “Assuming that millions of people will not try to flee in the event of a major accident or won’t be caught transiting through an area bisected by Canada’s busiest highway and a busy commuter rail corridor seems largely to be based on wishful thinking rather than a realistic assessment of the wisdom of operating a nuclear plant in the heart of our largest urban area. If Sunday’s event had turned out to not be a false alarm, chaos could well have resulted.”

The Alliance has a 2016 explainer on the special safety issues at the Pickering nuclear station.

In the aftermath of the alert, CBC followed up with a review of how the province would respond in a real nuclear emergency, while a new Oraclepoll Research survey found 82% of Canadians concerned about nuclear spills and 77% worried about neighbourhood safety and security near nuclear plants.



in Canada, Cities & Communities, Clean Electricity Grid, Health & Safety, Legal & Regulatory, Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion, Nuclear, Sub-National Governments

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

Environmental Defence Canada/flickr
Shale & Fracking

Repsol Abandons Plan to Ship Canadian LNG to Europe

March 18, 2023
205
U.S. Bureau of Land Management/flickr
Oil & Gas

Biden Approves $8B Oil Extraction Plan in Ecologically Sensitive Alaska

March 14, 2023
124
David Dodge, Green Energy Futures/flickr
Community Climate Finance

U.S. Solar Developers Scramble after Silicon Valley Bank Collapse

March 14, 2023
370

Comments 1

  1. Angela Bischoff says:
    3 years ago

    This alert was a reminder that the Pickering Nuclear Station is surrounded by more people (within 30 km.) than any other nuclear plant on the continent. It is also one of the oldest and biggest nuclear stations in North America. The plant also has a long history of serious accidents. Read our report on what a Fukishima-scale disaster could mean for Pickering. https://www.cleanairalliance.org/pickering-nuclear-emergency-next-time-it-could-be-real/

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

David Dodge, Green Energy Futures/flickr

U.S. Solar Developers Scramble after Silicon Valley Bank Collapse

March 14, 2023
370
Environmental Defence Canada/flickr

Repsol Abandons Plan to Ship Canadian LNG to Europe

March 18, 2023
205
Rebecca Bollwitt/flickr

Fossils Stay ‘Oily’, Gibsons Sues Big Oil, U.S. Clean Energy Booms, EU Pushes Fossil Phaseout, and Fukushima Disaster was ‘No Accident’

March 14, 2023
192
Joshua Doubek/Wikipedia

No New Jobs Came from Alberta’s $4B ‘Job Creation’ Tax Cut for Big Oil

October 6, 2022
828
U.S. National Transportation Safety Board/flickr

$30.9B Price Tag Makes Trans Mountain Pipeline a ‘Catastrophic Boondoggle’

March 14, 2023
243
moerschy / Pixabay

Fringe Conspiracy Theories Target 15-Minute City Push in Edmonton, Toronto

February 22, 2023
1.7k

Recent Posts

U.S. Bureau of Land Management/flickr

Biden Approves $8B Oil Extraction Plan in Ecologically Sensitive Alaska

March 14, 2023
124
EcoAnalytics

Canadians Want Strong Emissions Cap Regulations, Not More Missed Targets

March 14, 2023
127
Behrat/Wikimedia Commons

Hawaii Firm Turns Home Water Heaters into Grid Batteries

March 14, 2023
450
Raysonho/wikimedia commons

Purolator Pledges $1B to Electrify Last-Mile Delivery

March 14, 2023
84
United Nations

UN Buys Tanker, But Funding Gap Could Scuttle Plan to Salvage Oil from ‘Floating Time Bomb’

March 10, 2023
94
Gage Skidmore/Wikimedia Commons

Biden Cuts Fossil Subsidies, But Oil and Gas Still Lines Up for Billions

March 10, 2023
185
Next Post
Minister of Finance Bill Morneau Ryerson University

Morneau Cites Climate as ‘Central Focus’ of 2020 Federal Budget

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}