• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
Celebrating our 1,000th edition. The climate news you need
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  FEATURED
Ex-Fossil Workers Convert Old Oilfields to Solar Farms After ‘Rapid Upskilling’ in Alberta June 29, 2022
London Becomes Biggest City to Sign Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty June 29, 2022
G7 Miss ‘Golden Opportunity’, Walk Back Pledge to Cut International Fossil Finance June 29, 2022
Soaring Fertilizer Prices Could Deliver ‘Silver Lining’ For Emissions, But Farmers Struggle to Limit Use June 26, 2022
BREAKING: UN Nature Summit, the ‘Paris Conference for Biodiversity’, Moves to Montreal in December June 19, 2022
Next
Prev
Home Fossil Fuels Coal

Failing to Dump Fossil Investments Costs California Pension Funds $17 Billion Over 10 Years

November 13, 2019
Reading time: 3 minutes

Tommaso Galli/Flickr

Tommaso Galli/Flickr

7
SHARES
 

The two biggest pension funds in California missed out on US$17 billion in income by holding onto their fossil fuel investments for a decade too long, Fossil Free California reports in a study released last week.

Until now, the California State Teachers’ Retirement System (CalSTRS) and the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) “generally have resisted divestment proposals, saying they should be focused on investment returns rather than politics,” the Sacramento Bee reports. “They argue that engaging with the companies as shareholders is a more effective way of preparing for the future than divestment.”

But Fossil Free California aimed to amp up the pressure to divest by releasing its research ahead of CalSTRS’ board meeting last Wednesday, and the advocacy group is not alone. “Gov. Gavin Newsom recently signed an executive order asking the funds to consider steering investments away from greenhouse gas emissions, and a new law will soon require California to define ‘climate-related financial risk’,” the Bee writes. And “state Treasurer Fiona Ma, who sits on the board of both the state pension funds, has expressed her support for fossil fuel divestment.”

“We’ve been making the moral argument, we’ve been making financial arguments, and I think people in government are starting to see things our way,” said Fossil Free California treasurer .Sandy Emerson.

“If CalSTRS, worth $237 billion, or CalPERS, worth $380 billion, were to divest from fossil fuels, they would be the first state pension funds in the U.S. to do so,” the Bee notes. “The University of California recently announced it would divest from fossil fuels for economic reasons in its endowment and its pension fund, worth a combined $83 billion.”

Both state pension systems are currently underfunded, with CalPERS holding only 70% and CalSTRS just 64% of the dollars they would need to pay all their current and future obligations to retirees. But while a 2017 report by the business-backed American Council for Capital Formation blamed environmental and social investment strategies for the shortfall, the report commissioned by Fossil Free California reached virtually the opposite conclusion.

Toronto-based Corporate Knights “calculated what the funds’ returns would have been had they distributed their fossil fuel investments across the spectrum of the rest of their public equities over those years,” the Bee states. “In 2009, 17.6% of CalPERS’ investments were in fossil fuel companies, according to the analysis. For CalSTRS, it was 16.3%. Had CalPERS instead invested that money proportionally across its indexes, it would have generated an additional $11.9 billion over the 10-year stretch, according to the study. CalSTRS would have generated an additional $5.5 billion.”

Corporate Knights founder Toby Heaps questioned whether fossil companies are a safe investment for public pension funds. “It’s a shrinking sector, it’s a sunset sector, but it made a lot of money for a lot of people over 100 years,” he said. “People operate on that assumption that it’s going to bounce back.”

In the Bee report, neither of the state funds seemed inclined to accept the report’s conclusions. “Cherry picking selective time periods to analyze investments and then making broad, sweeping conclusions about how those investments will perform in the future does little to inform the discussion or address the issue of climate risk,” said CalPERS spokesperson Wayne Davis.

“By engaging with policy-makers and companies, and analyzing a broad range of research and data, CalSTRS will manage climate risk and find the best investments that help deliver climate solutions,” the teachers’ fund added. “These practices will also deliver the returns we need to pay promised benefits.”



in Coal, Community Climate Finance, Ending Emissions, Oil & Gas, Sub-National Governments, United States

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

Keith Hirsche
Jobs & Training

Ex-Fossil Workers Convert Old Oilfields to Solar Farms After ‘Rapid Upskilling’ in Alberta

June 29, 2022
392
London Eye UK England
Cities & Communities

London Becomes Biggest City to Sign Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty

June 29, 2022
120
Number 10/flickr
International Agencies & Studies

G7 Miss ‘Golden Opportunity’, Walk Back Pledge to Cut International Fossil Finance

June 29, 2022
142

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Keith Hirsche

Ex-Fossil Workers Convert Old Oilfields to Solar Farms After ‘Rapid Upskilling’ in Alberta

June 29, 2022
392
François GOGLINS/wikimedia commons

Corrosion Problem Shutters Half of France’s Nuclear Reactors

June 29, 2022
223
David/flickr

U.S. Supreme Court Expected to Gut Emission Controls as Climate Scientists Petition for Plan B

June 26, 2022
1.2k
Danielle Scott/flickr

Advocate Urges Ottawa to Intervene Before Ontario Builds Highway 413

June 29, 2022
128
Number 10/flickr

G7 Miss ‘Golden Opportunity’, Walk Back Pledge to Cut International Fossil Finance

June 29, 2022
142
London Eye UK England

London Becomes Biggest City to Sign Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty

June 29, 2022
120

Recent Posts

AJEL / Pixabay

Windfall Tax on Food, Fossil, Pharma Giants Would Raise $490B to Solve ‘Catastrophic’ Food Crisis: Oxfam

June 29, 2022
57
futureatlas.com/flickr

Ottawa Demands Deeper Fuel Emissions Cuts, Offers Fossils a Double-Dip on Tax Breaks

June 29, 2022
77
Province of B.C./flickr

Comox Joins Municipalities Seeking Ban on New Gas Stations

June 29, 2022
75
/Piqsels

Refocus Agriculture Spending to Cut Emissions, Boost Productivity, OECD Urges Governments

June 29, 2022
28
Jimmy Emerson, DVM/flickr

Public Vigilance Key to Protecting Greenbelts for Climate Resilience, Report Finds

June 29, 2022
35
Miguel V/Wikimedia Commons

Forests Fall Short of Full Carbon Storage Potential, Study Finds

June 29, 2022
62
Next Post
Governor-General of New Zealand/Wikimedia Commons

New Zealand Legislates Net Zero by 2050 with Cross-Partisan Support

The Energy Mix

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}