• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
SPECIAL REPORT: ‘Defuse the Climate Time Bomb’ with Net-Zero by 2040, Guterres Urges G20 March 20, 2023
Devastating Impacts, Affordable Climate Solutions Drive IPCC’s Urgent Call for Action March 20, 2023
Window for 1.5°C ‘Rapidly Closing’, IPCC Warns March 20, 2023
Swift Action, Inclusive Resilience Vital in Face of Overlapping Climate Hazards March 20, 2023
Shift from Fossils to Renewables is Quickest, Cheapest Path to Cut Emissions, IPCC Report Shows March 20, 2023
Next
Prev

Analysts Pan ‘False Equivalencies’ Between Liberal, Conservative Climate Plans, Cite Massive Public Support for Off-Carbon Transition

October 8, 2019
Reading time: 4 minutes
Primary Author: The Energy Mix staff

Lydia Jacobs/Public Domain Pictures

Lydia Jacobs/Public Domain Pictures

1
SHARES
 

The false equivalencies being drawn between the Liberal and Conservative parties’ climate plans, the importance of this month’s election result to Canada’s clean energy future, and the massive majority of Canadians who want the country to succeed at its carbon-free transition are all on the agenda as Vancouver-based Clean Energy Canada rolls out a series of election op eds, reports, and opinion surveys.

The flurry of content accelerated last week. First, CEC issued a major clean energy jobs report. Then Executive Director Merran Smith and Policy Director Dan Woynillowicz published a National Observer op ed pointing to the dramatic difference in the two leading parties’ responses to the climate crisis, despite at least two media pundits’ (and some climate hawks’) insistence that there’s no daylight between them.

  • Concise headlines. Original content. Timely news and views from a select group of opinion leaders. Special extras.
  • Everything you need, nothing you don’t.
  • The Weekender: The climate news you need.
Subscribe

“The discrepancy between how global policy experts view Canada’s climate efforts and how they are perceived among environmentally concerned Canadians appears to arise from two key things: the government’s purchase of the Trans Mountain pipeline, and its admission that Canada isn’t yet on track to achieve our 2030 emission reduction targets,” they write. And there’s “a third and critically important reason: most Canadians aren’t aware of all the federal government has done.”

Smith and Woynillowicz say their recent series of Observer op eds traces Canada’s efforts to support electric vehicles, phase out coal-fired generation, boost energy efficiency, introduce a clean fuel standard (against epic fossil industry opposition), and hold the line on tailpipe emission standards that have faced a sustained attack from the Trump White House.

“The net effect of these efforts will be 434 million tonnes less carbon pollution in 2030—taking Canada nearly three-quarters of the way to our 2030 Paris target,” they write. “Meanwhile, modelling of the Conservative’s Real Plan finds that emissions will—wait for it—increase between now and 2030.”

Which means that—even after the Trudeau government bought us all a pipeline, and even if neither plan hits Canada’s Paris target—the comparison is still more complicated than comparing the two plans to Tweedle-Dum and Tweedle-Dee, Smith and Woynillowicz say. Which is exactly what one media analyst did.

In a second post, this one for the Globe and Mail, Smith and CEC Senior Policy Advisor Sarah Petrevan introduce a vision of Canada’s carbon-free future by describing three jobs that already exist—a carbon dioxide recycler in Halifax who makes “stronger, cleaner concrete” for new homes, an electric bus builder in Winnipeg, and a clean fuel producer in Edmonton. “Now picture Canada in 10 years,” they write. “Imagine nearly twice as many jobs like those of Diane, Kate ,and Charles. By 2030, Canada’s clean energy sector is on track to employ 559,400 Canadians in jobs such as these across the country,” growing three times faster than employment across the economy.

Overall, Clean Energy Canada reported last week that the clean economy is set to create 160,000 new jobs by 2030, while fossil employment declines by 50,000.

But the wild card behind that analysis is the outcome of the October 21 federal election.

“This bigger, brighter picture is modelled on climate policies that were in place earlier this year—and presupposes that they would remain in place,” Smith and Petrevan warn. “As a federal election approaches, whether this is the case is a matter of question. The Conservative Party, for example, has said it will kill not only carbon pricing but also the clean fuel standard,” the loss of which would wipe out 31,000 jobs.

“Canada can still be an energy leader in the decades ahead,” they add. “But that future doesn’t exist without a strong clean energy sector—and a federal government after October’s election that will maintain and expand on the progress we’ve made.”

On Monday, Clean Energy Canada and Ottawa-based Abacus Data released a poll that showed 86% of respondents saying Canada “can be among the world’s most successful countries in developing and using clean energy technologies,” while 71% believe the country “can be even more successful in the future” if it’s thoughtful about the transition off fossil fuels.

“Most people believe there is upside for Canada in pursuing an energy transition, not only in terms of combating climate change but also in terms of economic risk and opportunity,” said Abacus Chair Bruce Anderson. “A very large majority are convinced that the clean energy and technology market is a massive opportunity for Canada, and one that must be embraced.”

“Canadians believe there’s a strong future for our clean energy sector,” Woynillowicz added. “Going backward wouldn’t just worsen climate change, it would threaten a significant sector that Canadians are counting on to create opportunity as the world transitions from fossil fuels.”



in Canada, Carbon Levels & Measurement, Ending Emissions, Energy / Carbon Pricing & Economics, Energy Politics, Jobs & Training, Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

Kern River Valley Fire Info/Facebook
International Agencies & Studies

SPECIAL REPORT: ‘Defuse the Climate Time Bomb’ with Net-Zero by 2040, Guterres Urges G20

March 20, 2023
232
IFRC Intl. Federation:Twitter
International Agencies & Studies

Devastating Impacts, Affordable Climate Solutions Drive IPCC’s Urgent Call for Action

March 21, 2023
760
U.S. National Park Service/rawpixel
International Agencies & Studies

Window for 1.5°C ‘Rapidly Closing’, IPCC Warns

March 20, 2023
72

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Kenuoene/pixabay

Shift from Fossils to Renewables is Quickest, Cheapest Path to Cut Emissions, IPCC Report Shows

March 20, 2023
194
U.S. Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement/flickr

Willow Oil Project in Alaska Faces Legal Challenges, Economic Doubts

March 19, 2023
476
Kern River Valley Fire Info/Facebook

SPECIAL REPORT: ‘Defuse the Climate Time Bomb’ with Net-Zero by 2040, Guterres Urges G20

March 20, 2023
232
IFRC Intl. Federation:Twitter

Devastating Impacts, Affordable Climate Solutions Drive IPCC’s Urgent Call for Action

March 21, 2023
760
Secretariat of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine/Wikimedia Commons

IPCC Report Charts a Course for Ottawa’s ‘Clean Technology’ Budget

March 21, 2023
115
U.S. National Park Service/rawpixel

Window for 1.5°C ‘Rapidly Closing’, IPCC Warns

March 20, 2023
72

Recent Posts

FMSC/Flickr

Swift Action, Inclusive Resilience Vital in Face of Overlapping Climate Hazards

March 20, 2023
65
Kiara Worth, UNClimateChange/flickr

Gap Between IPCC’s Science, National Actions Sets Challenge for COP 28

March 21, 2023
67
Photo by IISD/ENB

IPCC Sees Deeper Risk in Overshooting 1.5°C Warming Threshold

March 20, 2023
44
EcoFlight

Historic Deal Reopens B.C. Indigenous Territory to Fracking, Promises Land Restoration

March 19, 2023
440
Wikimedia Commons/Humans of Vanuatu

Six Countries Call for Fossil-Free Pacific

March 19, 2023
50
Wikipedia

Fossil Funding Makes Indigenous Resource Network a ‘Propaganda Machine’, Opponent Says

March 19, 2023
79
Next Post
Max Goessler/Pixabay

Oil Lobby Wish List Would Drive Up Canada’s Fossil Emissions 60% by 2030, Analysis Shows

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}