• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
Celebrating our 1,000th edition. The climate news you need
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  FEATURED
Ex-Fossil Workers Convert Old Oilfields to Solar Farms After ‘Rapid Upskilling’ in Alberta June 29, 2022
London Becomes Biggest City to Sign Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty June 29, 2022
G7 Miss ‘Golden Opportunity’, Walk Back Pledge to Cut International Fossil Finance June 29, 2022
Soaring Fertilizer Prices Could Deliver ‘Silver Lining’ For Emissions, But Farmers Struggle to Limit Use June 26, 2022
BREAKING: UN Nature Summit, the ‘Paris Conference for Biodiversity’, Moves to Montreal in December June 19, 2022
Next
Prev
Opinion & Analysis
Home Jurisdictions Canada

Beer: After Spat Over Pro-Fossil T-Shirt, Are Climate Action Messages Now Welcome in Senate Gallery?

September 10, 2019
Reading time: 3 minutes
Primary Author: Mitchell Beer @mitchellbeer

Mightydrake/Wikimedia Commons

Mightydrake/Wikimedia Commons

1
SHARES
 

The agency responsible for security across Parliamentary Precinct in Ottawa seems to be inadvertently taking sides in Canada’s politically fraught energy debates, after an oil and gas executive associated with the pro-fossil Canada Action lobby group tried to wear a provocative “I love Canadian oil and gas” t-shirt during a visit to the Senate.

The message was certainly (absolutely!) within the realm of the free speech rights any Canadian should expect. But there was just one problem: The Parliament of Canada’s website warns that “participating in any form of demonstration inside the buildings is prohibited, including wearing items or clothing with visible political messages,” CBC reports.

So during a Senate tour last week, William Lacey, CFO of Calgary-based Steelhead Petroleum, “was told by a security guard that he would have to remove his shirt because it could be offensive,” CBC writes. “He says he chose to turn the shirt inside out to be part of the tour because his other option was to leave.” Afterwards, he explained that he’s “worked in the sector for more than 20 years and wore the shirt in Ottawa because he’s proud of the energy industry, but knows many people think of it negatively,” the national broadcaster adds.

The episode was enough to raise the ire of pro-fossil senators during a committee meeting last Thursday.

“As a Canadian, I find it outrageous,” thundered Sen. David Tkachuk (C-SK), the fiercely partisan committee chair who spent more than a year dissecting the federal government’s proposed Impact Assessment Act, Bill C-69, ultimately incurring criticism for wasting government resources.

“As a western Canadian, I just find that outrageous,” echoed Saskatchewan Conservative Denise Batters.

“It’s important that people should be allowed to express themselves in a positive and non-confrontational way,” Lacey said. He questioned whether an “I love Canadian forests” t-shirt would have produced the same reaction, then wrote to members of Parliament, senators, and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to complain about the experience.

The Parliamentary Protective Service caved almost immediately. “Personnel misinterpreted a message on the visitor’s article of clothing,” wrote Acting Chief of Staff Guillaume Vandal. “The staff involved will be receiving operational guidance and training with respect to visitors to the Hill.”

Left unanswered were two questions: how, exactly, the security staff misinterpreted the message on Lacey’s shirt, and how far their upcoming “operational guidance” will go.

“Does your response to the original complaint in this matter mean the Parliamentary Protective Service would now permit an equal and opposite message, supporting a fossil fuel phaseout that helped protect Canadians from the worst impacts of a climate crisis that the House of Commons has already declared an emergency?” The Energy Mix wrote Friday, kicking off a series of questions to the PPS media desk.

“If not, does that mean the Parliamentary Protective Service now considers it political speech to support a managed decline in fossil fuel development, but non-political speech to explicitly support expanding that same industry? If so, on what evidence base is the Parliamentary Protective Service taking sides?” And “how will your responses to these questions shape the ‘operational guidance’ M. Vandal promised for front-line staff?”When The Mix called the PPS last Friday, the day after the CBC report, it was clear the organization was under pressure and utterly unaccustomed to the scrutiny it was receiving. By Tuesday, there’d been no response to the original set of questions. After a follow-up call, we received an email with a repeat of Vandal’s initial statement, leaving the follow-up questions unaddressed



in Canada, Energy Politics, Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion, Oil & Gas, Opinion & Analysis

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

Keith Hirsche
Jobs & Training

Ex-Fossil Workers Convert Old Oilfields to Solar Farms After ‘Rapid Upskilling’ in Alberta

June 29, 2022
392
London Eye UK England
Cities & Communities

London Becomes Biggest City to Sign Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty

June 29, 2022
120
Number 10/flickr
International Agencies & Studies

G7 Miss ‘Golden Opportunity’, Walk Back Pledge to Cut International Fossil Finance

June 29, 2022
142

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Keith Hirsche

Ex-Fossil Workers Convert Old Oilfields to Solar Farms After ‘Rapid Upskilling’ in Alberta

June 29, 2022
392
François GOGLINS/wikimedia commons

Corrosion Problem Shutters Half of France’s Nuclear Reactors

June 29, 2022
223
David/flickr

U.S. Supreme Court Expected to Gut Emission Controls as Climate Scientists Petition for Plan B

June 26, 2022
1.2k
Danielle Scott/flickr

Advocate Urges Ottawa to Intervene Before Ontario Builds Highway 413

June 29, 2022
128
Number 10/flickr

G7 Miss ‘Golden Opportunity’, Walk Back Pledge to Cut International Fossil Finance

June 29, 2022
142
London Eye UK England

London Becomes Biggest City to Sign Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty

June 29, 2022
120

Recent Posts

AJEL / Pixabay

Windfall Tax on Food, Fossil, Pharma Giants Would Raise $490B to Solve ‘Catastrophic’ Food Crisis: Oxfam

June 29, 2022
57
futureatlas.com/flickr

Ottawa Demands Deeper Fuel Emissions Cuts, Offers Fossils a Double-Dip on Tax Breaks

June 29, 2022
77
Province of B.C./flickr

Comox Joins Municipalities Seeking Ban on New Gas Stations

June 29, 2022
75
/Piqsels

Refocus Agriculture Spending to Cut Emissions, Boost Productivity, OECD Urges Governments

June 29, 2022
28
Jimmy Emerson, DVM/flickr

Public Vigilance Key to Protecting Greenbelts for Climate Resilience, Report Finds

June 29, 2022
35
Miguel V/Wikimedia Commons

Forests Fall Short of Full Carbon Storage Potential, Study Finds

June 29, 2022
62
Next Post
Parti conservateur du Québec/flickr

Climate Denial, Online Abuse Dominate Twitter as Election Messaging Gears Up

The Energy Mix

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}