• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
Celebrating our 1,000th edition. The climate news you need
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  FEATURED
EXCLUSIVE: Hydrogen is Up, Pieridae is Out as German Chancellor Preps for Canada Visit August 15, 2022
Historic Climate Bill Passes U.S. House, Goes to Biden for Signature August 15, 2022
BREAKING: U.S. Senate Passes Historic $369B Climate Package August 7, 2022
Researchers Point To ‘Dangerously Unexplored’ Risk of Global Climate Catastrophe August 2, 2022
Koch Network Pressures Manchin, Sinema as Advocates Praise ‘Game Changing’ Climate Deal August 2, 2022
Next
Prev

Fossils Could Lose $2.2 Trillion by 2030 if Countries Get Serious About Carbon Cuts

September 8, 2019
Reading time: 4 minutes

lalabell68/Pixabay

lalabell68/Pixabay

24
SHARES
 

The world’s most colossal fossils have invested US$50 billion in less than two years in new oil and gas projects that undercut the fight against climate change, according to a new analysis by the UK-based Carbon Tracker think tank, the first ever to assess whether individual fossil projects would be financially sustainable in a low-carbon world.

It found that Big Oil could lose up to $2.2 trillion by 2030 if governments get serious about decarbonization.

“To meet climate goals, it is an unavoidable consequence that fossil fuel use must drop dramatically,” the report states. “The only way that fossil fuel companies can be ‘Paris-aligned’ is to commit to not sanctioning projects that fall outside this constraint, and shrink where necessary.”

And yet, “since the start of last year, fossil fuel companies have spent billions on high-cost plans to extract oil and gas from tar sands, deepwater fields, and the Arctic despite the risks to the climate and shareholder returns,” The Guardian writes, citing the Carbon Tracker report. “ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, and BP each spent at least 30% of their investment in 2018 on projects that are inconsistent with climate targets,” a total of 18 ventures collectively worth £40 billion that would be “deep out of the money in a low-carbon world”.

“Every oil major is betting heavily against a 1.5°C world and investing in projects that are contrary to the Paris goals,” said report author Andrew Grant.

Which means that “investors should challenge companies’ spending on new fossil fuel production,” he added. “The best way to both preserve shareholder value in the transition and align with climate change goals will be to focus on low-cost projects that will deliver the highest returns.”

The report “contradicts the public rhetoric of many oil executives who have claimed to support the Paris goals and vowed to invest in renewable energy projects,” The Guardian notes. “It found that none of the largest listed oil and gas companies are making investment decisions that are in line with global climate goals, and risk wasting $2.2 trillion (£1.8 trillion) by 2030 if governments take a tougher stance on carbon emissions.”

The new analysis took a unique approach by looking at the price of oil under various decarbonization scenarios, then assessing which individual fossil projects would succeed or fail under those financial conditions, InsideClimate News explains. In contrast to other past analyses that have focused on projects’ carbon intensity, “the logic we use is that of the market,” Grant said.

That approach revealed “that billions of dollars in new projects that were greenlit last year would lose money if the world succeeds in limiting warming to below 2.0°C,” InsideClimate notes. In Canada, “not a single tar sands project is likely to pay back investors under a 2.0°C scenario. In fact, they found that because of the great expense of extracting oil from Canada’s tar sands, or oil sands, the projects wouldn’t even pay off under a higher scenario that would lead to nearly 3.0°C of warming.”

Which means that, “essentially, Carbon Tracker found that either the days of profitable new oil sands projects are over or we are headed to a future of dangerous warming.” Oil and gas fracking projects could face price and demand challenges, as well.

“We agree that the world is not moving fast enough to tackle climate change,” a Shell spokesperson said in response to the study. “As the energy system evolves, so is our business, to provide the mix of products that our customers need.” Shell’s investment last year in a $13-billion liquefied natural gas project in Canada was one of the perverse choices highlighted in the Guardian story.

ExxonMobil CEO Darren Woods maintained that renewable energy won’t suffice to meet growing world energy demand, citing the International Energy Agency’s estimate that £17 trillion in new energy investment will be needed through 2040.

BP said its continuing push to produce low-cost and, it claims, low-carbon oil and gas is consistent with IEA estimates and the targets in the 2015 Paris Agreement. “All of this is aimed at evolving BP from an oil and gas-focused company to a much broader energy company so that we are best equipped to help the world get to net zero while meeting rising energy demand,” the company said in a statement.

But Carbon Tracker puts those claims in perspective. “In effect, oil companies are giving the world—and their investors—an either-or proposition,” InsideClimate writes. “Either their balance sheets go bust when oil demand plummets, or the world does as warming soars past 2.0°C/3.6°F. It’s one or the other, the report says.”

In a separate study last week, Bloomberg New Energy Finance said colossal fossils are on track to complete a record number of renewable energy deals this year, with nearly 70 already signed since January 1 and European companies showing considerably more interest than their U.S. counterparts.



in Arctic & Antarctica, Community Climate Finance, COP Conferences, Ending Emissions, International Agencies & Studies, Oceans, Oil & Gas, Shale & Fracking, Tar Sands / Oil Sands

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

TGEGASENGINEERING/Wikimedia Commons
Energy Politics

EXCLUSIVE: Hydrogen is Up, Pieridae is Out as German Chancellor Preps for Canada Visit

August 15, 2022
748
Steve Jurvetson/flickr
International Security & War

The Other Kind of Climate Change: Even a ‘Limited’ Nuclear War Would Trigger Starvation, Kill Billions

August 15, 2022
2
/Pikist
United States

Historic Climate Bill Passes U.S. House, Goes to Biden for Signature

August 15, 2022
221

Comments 1

  1. Gary Champagne says:
    3 years ago

    With an election looming in Canada and the Trudeau gov’t silent re: its early 2015 promise to begin to cut Canada’s Big Oil subsidies during a second term in Office, it is clear to me that his government will not keep that promise any more than he did his promise to bring in Electoral Reform.
    His Liberal Party, like the Conservative Party, is Corporate-fed and Corporate-led.
    Canada’s best hope for serious action on the Climate Change front rests in the election of a Minority Gov’t in October which sees the Balance of Power in the hands of a GREEN-led alliance of other elected Party Members of Parliament.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

TGEGASENGINEERING/Wikimedia Commons

EXCLUSIVE: Hydrogen is Up, Pieridae is Out as German Chancellor Preps for Canada Visit

August 15, 2022
748
Brocken Inaglory/wikimedia commons

State-Wide Megastorm Driven by Global Heating Could Drench California for a Month

August 15, 2022
437
/Pikist

Historic Climate Bill Passes U.S. House, Goes to Biden for Signature

August 15, 2022
221
Vinaykumar8687/WikimediaCommons

Solar On Track for ‘Staggering’ 30% Growth This Year

August 15, 2022
157
UK Black Tech/wikimedia commons

U.S. Tech Workers Leaving High-Paying Jobs to Focus on Climate Crisis

August 15, 2022
122
United States Marine Core/Wikimedia Commons

Distributed Energy Gains Ground With Mobile Microgrids, Vehicle-to-Grid Technology

August 15, 2022
114

Recent Posts

Steve Jurvetson/flickr

The Other Kind of Climate Change: Even a ‘Limited’ Nuclear War Would Trigger Starvation, Kill Billions

August 15, 2022
2
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Arctic Warms 4 Times Faster than Global Average, Surpassing Estimates 

August 15, 2022
116
rawpixel

Common Medications Foil Body’s Ability to Cope with Hot Weather

August 15, 2022
92
Max Pixel

Slashing Nitrogen Dioxide Pollution Can Improve Crop Yields, Study Finds

August 15, 2022
50
David Hawgood/Geograph

E-Bikes a ‘Faster and Fairer’ Emissions Solution than Electric Cars

August 15, 2022
103
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Northeast Region/wikimedia commons

Researchers Study Carbon Loss, Forest Impacts of Northwest Territories ‘Zombie Fires’

August 15, 2022
23
Next Post
Jakarta’s old harbour: Sea levels are rising

Jakarta’s sea level prompts a move – at a price

The Energy Mix

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}