• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
Celebrating our 1,000th edition. The climate news you need
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  FEATURED
Soaring Fertilizer Prices Could Deliver ‘Silver Lining’ For Emissions, But Farmers Struggle to Limit Use June 26, 2022
BREAKING: UN Nature Summit, the ‘Paris Conference for Biodiversity’, Moves to Montreal in December June 19, 2022
‘LET’S SUE BIG OIL’: Legal Team Launches Class Action Campaign for B.C. Municipalities June 17, 2022
‘It Could Have Been Any of Us’, Colleague Says, After Brazil Confirms Murders of Bruno Pereira, Dom Phillips June 17, 2022
Infrastructure Gap a ‘Life and Death’ Matter as Northern Canada Warms June 17, 2022
Next
Prev
Home Demand & Distribution Auto & Alternative Vehicles

Garossino: Despite Pipeline Approval, $70-Billion Federal Plan is Canada’s Best Shot at Decarbonizing

July 4, 2019
Reading time: 4 minutes

Justin Trudeau/Facebook

Justin Trudeau/Facebook

39
SHARES
 

While the Trudeau government disappointed its climate allies with its much-anticipated decision to re-approve the controversial Trans Mountain pipeline expansion, it has also crafted a more complicated record on energy and carbon by committing to C$70 billion in low-carbon investment over a 12-year span, reporter Sandy Garossino writes in a provocative post last week for National Observer.

The net result for anyone trying to assess the entirety of that record: It’s complicated.

“For many Canadians, blocking TMX became synonymous with winning the climate war. If you support the pipeline, you’re a sellout. If you don’t, you’re a climate hero,” she writes.

“If only things were that simple.”

Garossino weighs the “unforgiving” carbon calculus of Canada’s rising greenhouse gas emissions against the political reality that has seen premiers like Ontario’s Kathleen Wynne and Alberta’s Rachel Notley, both allies for Trudeau’s GHG reduction effort, lose political support, their own ambitious climate plans undone by the governments that replaced them. “The same fate awaited Trudeau if he had cancelled TMX,” she writes. “Nothing else would have mattered—he’d have been gone by November, along with everything his government has achieved.”

From that starting point, she concludes that “we have to do better than rally around symbols. We have to do the much harder work of changing the game.”

The fight the climate community can’t afford to lose, Garossino says, is the transition to clean energy. And on that score, “the Canadian government has amassed a stunning war chest of more than $60 billion, with billions more on the way.” In addition to the broader policy moves in the pan-Canadian climate plan, the dollar commitments listed by the federal finance department include:

• $26.9 billion over 12 years for green infrastructure;

• $28.7 billion over 10 years for public transportation infrastructure;

• $2 billion over two years for in the Low Carbon Economy Fund;

• $1.5 billion over five years for the Oceans Protection Plan;

• $1.3 billion over five years for the Nature Legacy;

• $2.3 billion over five years for clean technology funding (though the technology that funding supports isn’t always exactly clean);

• $1.0 billion in energy efficiency investments through the Federation of Canadian Municipalities.

Garossino also accepts the government’s promise that Trans Mountain will generate tax revenue and sale income that can be reinvested in the post-carbon transition. But either way, “there is so much more to reaching our Paris climate goals than a single pipeline,” she writes. With the Parliamentary Budget Officer pointing to a 79-million-tonne gap between the country’s Harper-era carbon target and its current performance, “the Liberal plan is to push that 79-megatonne number down using a spectrum of transportation, electrification, building innovation, and infrastructure initiatives, funded by general revenues, long-term debt, and TMX-generated taxes. That $70 billion will go a long way to getting 79 megatonnes to zero, maybe even further.”

Garossino’s bigger question is about politics and the art of the possible.

“We could cancel TMX tomorrow. The global network would recalculate supply routes faster than Google Maps, with no measurable GHG impact,” she writes.

“Canadian investor confidence would plummet, and in this challenging international environment Canada could enter recession very rapidly, eroding the government’s ability to meet its existing climate commitments.

“Trudeau would lose the next election, and Andrew Scheer would stop the Liberals’ climate plan in its tracks, just as Alberta and Ontario have done.

“That $70 billion for clean energy? Gone.

“The carbon tax? Gone.”

So while “no environmentalist or supporter of Indigenous communities wants to see the oil industry’s relentless expansion continue,” the country also has the $70 billion in place, two proposed pipelines dead, a third one on life support, and a litany of other regulatory changes on the books. “There’s no way to describe this other than as a revolutionary, ambitious, comprehensive, and powerful climate and conservation plan that makes compromises to preserve jobs and investor confidence,” she writes.

“Are there flaws? Of course there are, and will be,” including insufficient attention to Indigenous land interests and self-determination. “But in climate terms, this is a good bargain, maybe the best achievable plan we’ll see. It will set the course for decades into our children’s and grandchildren’s future,” making this “the most momentous opportunity in Canada’s climate history” and a chance that “won’t come again.”



in Auto & Alternative Vehicles, Biodiversity & Habitat, Buildings, Canada, Carbon Levels & Measurement, Community Climate Finance, Demand & Efficiency, Energy Politics, First Peoples, Legal & Regulatory, Oceans, Oil & Gas, Pipelines / Rail Transport, Solar, Sub-National Governments, Tar Sands / Oil Sands, Transit, Wind

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

David/flickr
United States

U.S. Supreme Court Expected to Gut Emission Controls as Climate Scientists Petition for Plan B

June 26, 2022
1
pxhere
Environmental Justice

Environmental Racism Bill Passes Second Reading in House of Commons

June 26, 2022
1
Graco/Facebook
Food Security

Soaring Fertilizer Prices Could Deliver ‘Silver Lining’ For Emissions, But Farmers Struggle to Limit Use

June 26, 2022
2

Comments 2

  1. Randal Hadland says:
    3 years ago

    “There’s no way to describe this other than as a…” momentous sellout of the future . We don’t need the money from the tar sands to make the switch. That is like using tar to clean your hands, it doesn’t work worth crap. Investor confidence might wain if we don’t construct a money losing, socially unacceptable, environmentally destructive and climate change causing energy infrastructure that would have to work for 50 years to pay for itself? Well maybe those aren’t really investors, maybe they are just rip off artists, and we can lose them comfortably.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

The federal government's Cliff Street Power Plant is at the centre of Ottawa's plans to reduce natural gas demand. Photo: PWGSC

EXCLUSIVE: Ontario Regulator Refuses New Pipeline, Tells Enbridge to Plan for Lower Gas Demand

May 30, 2022
5.2k
Jason Woodhead/Flickr

Trans Mountain Pipeline On Track to Lose $600 Million, Parliamentary Budget Officer Finds

June 24, 2022
341
Ben_Kerckx/Pixabay

Plastics Cited as ‘Fossil Industry’s Plan B’ as Guilbeault Announces Partial Ban

June 24, 2022
219
Bruce Reeve/Flickr

Opinion: Ontario’s New ‘Carbon Tax’ Looks Like the One Doug Ford Fought

June 7, 2022
1.6k
eloialferez66/pixnio

Toronto’s New Backyard Homes Will Help Fight Sprawl

June 24, 2022
70
Greg Goebel/Wikimedia Commons

Canadian Pension Board Invests $141M in Chinese Coal Projects, Undercutting Federal Phaseout Policy

July 29, 2020
2.3k

Recent Posts

David/flickr

U.S. Supreme Court Expected to Gut Emission Controls as Climate Scientists Petition for Plan B

June 26, 2022
1
pxhere

Environmental Racism Bill Passes Second Reading in House of Commons

June 26, 2022
1
Graco/Facebook

Soaring Fertilizer Prices Could Deliver ‘Silver Lining’ For Emissions, But Farmers Struggle to Limit Use

June 26, 2022
2
stockvault

Animal Agriculture Could Reduce Future Pandemic Risk, UK Researchers Say

June 26, 2022
1
Gustavo Petro Urrego/flickr

Colombia’s President-Elect Has ‘Ambitious’ Plans to Halt Amazon Deforestation

June 26, 2022
1
Adam E. Moreira/wikimedia commons

Suspend Transit Fares, Not Gas Tax, Climate Advocates Urge Biden

June 26, 2022
1
Next Post
bhuman34/Pixabay

Ottawa Finalizes Carbon Price Plan for Large Industrial Emitters

The Energy Mix

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}