• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
Danske Bank Quits New Fossil Fuel Financing January 23, 2023
Extreme Warming Ahead Even as Worst-Case Scenarios Grow ‘Obsolete’ January 23, 2023
Notley Scorches Federal Just Transition Bill as Fossil CEO Calls for Oilsands Boom January 23, 2023
IRON OXIDE: New Battery Brings Long-Duration Storage to Grids, 750 Jobs to West Virginia January 23, 2023
BREAKING: GFANZ Banks, Investors Pour Hundreds of Billions into Fossil Fuels January 17, 2023
Next
Prev

Ontario Court of Appeal Upholds Federal Carbon Tax

July 2, 2019
Reading time: 4 minutes
Primary Author: Mitchell Beer @mitchellbeer

digifly840 / Pixabay

digifly840 / Pixabay

72
SHARES
 

The Doug Ford government will be looking for a hearing before the Supreme Court of Canada after the Ontario Court of Appeal ruled 4-1 last Friday that the federal government had the constitutional authority to introduce its national carbon pricing plan.

The result means that, now, “the real carbon tax is the money provinces are spending on lawyers,” the Globe and Mail’s Politics newsletter headlined this morning.

  • Concise headlines. Original content. Timely news and views from a select group of opinion leaders. Special extras.
  • Everything you need, nothing you don’t.
  • The Weekender: The climate news you need.
New!
Subscribe

“Parliament has determined that atmospheric accumulation of greenhouse gases causes climate changes that pose an existential threat to human civilization and the global ecosystem,” Chief Justice George Strathy wrote in the majority decision.

“The need for a collective approach to a matter of national concern, and the risk of non-participation by one or more provinces, permits Canada to adopt minimum national standards to reduce [greenhouse gas] emissions,” he added.

“The Act does this and no more,” the court decision added. “It leaves ample scope for provincial legislation in relation to the environment, climate change ,and GHGs, while narrowly constraining federal jurisdiction to address the risk of provincial inaction.”

The judges added that the provinces on their own would not be able to reduce carbon pollution on the scale the climate crisis demands. “Without a collective national response, all they can do is prepare for the worst,” they wrote.

The Ford government responded immediately with a promise to seek a Supreme Court appeal, repeating its claim that the federal carbon tax makes life more expensive for Ontarians. “We promised to use every tool at our disposal to challenge the carbon tax, and we will continue to fight to keep this promise,” the premier said in a prepared statement.

But this morning’s Globe and Mail editorializes that “at this point that the conservative-led movement to discredit Ottawa’s carbon pricing regime is in tatters. Two courts in two different provinces have now ruled that the regime is constitutional. At the same time, the climate-change plans introduced by provincial governments that oppose carbon pricing, as well as by the federal Conservative Party, are being criticized for their lack of effectiveness.”

In the Ontario case, “federal lawyers argued the province was fearmongering,” CBC reports. “The act, they said, was a legitimate response to potentially catastrophic climate change by creating an incentive for people to change their behaviour.”

And “to the delight of environmental groups, the majority of the Appeal Court agreed with Ottawa, rejecting any contention the carbon levy is an illegal tax,” the national broadcaster adds. “They are regulatory in nature and connected to the purposes of the act,” Strathy wrote, adding that greenhouse gas reductions must be achieved efficiently, not piecemeal.

“The establishment of minimum national standards does precisely that.”

Federal Conservative leader Andrew Scheer and Alberta Premier Jason Kenney both echoed Ford’s opposition to the ruling. “The good news is that after October 21, provinces will no longer have to fight the Liberal carbon tax in court,” Scheer said in a prepared statement. “My first action as prime minister will be to scrap Justin Trudeau’s carbon tax and help Canadians get ahead.”

“It is unfortunate that Conservative politicians…continue to waste taxpayers’ dollars fighting climate action in court rather than taking real action to fight climate change,” responded Environment and Climate Change Minister Catherine McKenna, who called the judgement “good news for every Canadian who believes that climate action is urgent”.

Stewart Elgie, a University of Ottawa professor of law and economics at the University of Ottawa, called the decision a “big nail in the coffin” for the Conservative premiers fighting the federal carbon tax. “Two provincial appeal courts have upheld the federal law, and it is very likely the Supreme Court will do the same,” he told CBC. “It would be great if Doug Ford took the C$30 million he’s using to fight carbon pricing, and instead used it to fight climate change.”

“The court decision may not have gone his way, but it should be welcomed by Premier Doug Ford because it gives him the chance to change course on his misguided efforts to fight the carbon tax,” said Clean Prosperity Executive Director Michael Bernstein. “This ruling should be considered a victory for both the environment, and Ontario families and businesses.”

 “The courts are aligning with Parliament, Canadian municipalities, and the public in confirming that national action is needed to tackle this climate emergency,” said David Suzuki Foundation Science and Policy Director Ian Bruce. “There’s growing recognition throughout the country that Canada’s climate emergency must be met with national measures in line with the urgency and challenge of meeting our climate commitments.”

“One of the main recommendations from the 2015 Lancet Commission on Health and Climate Change was the establishment of a strong, predictable price on climate emissions to drive healthy change in the same way as increased prices of tobacco products did.” said Dr. Courtney Howard, president of Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment. “Including carbon pricing, a proven, effective tool as part of our approach to climate change, helps us protect people from the harmful impacts of heat waves, droughts, wildfires, hurricanes, and floods that are becoming more frequent and more intense because of climate change.”



in Canada, Ending Emissions, Energy / Carbon Pricing & Economics, Energy Politics, Legal & Regulatory, Sub-National Governments

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

RL0919/wikimedia commons
Finance & Investment

Danske Bank Quits New Fossil Fuel Financing

January 23, 2023
2.2k
@tongbingxue/Twitter
Ending Emissions

Extreme Warming Ahead Even as Worst-Case Scenarios Grow ‘Obsolete’

January 23, 2023
293
Rachel Notley/Facebook
Jobs & Training

Notley Scorches Federal Just Transition Bill as Fossil CEO Calls for Oilsands Boom

January 23, 2023
271

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

EcoAnalytics

Albertans Want a Just Transition, Despite Premier’s Grumbling

January 23, 2023
251
United Nations

Salvage of $20B ‘Floating Time Bomb’ Delayed by Rising Cost of Oil Tankers

January 27, 2023
66
RL0919/wikimedia commons

Danske Bank Quits New Fossil Fuel Financing

January 23, 2023
2.2k
@tongbingxue/Twitter

Extreme Warming Ahead Even as Worst-Case Scenarios Grow ‘Obsolete’

January 23, 2023
293
Weirton, WV by Jon Dawson/flickr

IRON OXIDE: New Battery Brings Long-Duration Storage to Grids, 750 Jobs to West Virginia

January 23, 2023
514
Rachel Notley/Facebook

Notley Scorches Federal Just Transition Bill as Fossil CEO Calls for Oilsands Boom

January 23, 2023
271

Recent Posts

Sergio Boscaino/flickr

Dubai Mulls Quitting C40 Cities Over ‘Costly’ Climate Target

January 24, 2023
89
hangela/pixabay

New UK Coal Mine Faces Two Legal Challenges

January 24, 2023
46

Gas Stoves Enter U.S. Climate Culture War, Become ‘Bellwether’ for Industry

January 22, 2023
75
Jeff Hitchcock/flickr.

BREAKING: GFANZ Banks, Investors Pour Hundreds of Billions into Fossil Fuels

January 23, 2023
501

Exxon Had the Right Global Warming Numbers Through Decades of Denial: Study

January 17, 2023
226
willenhallwench / Pixabay

Ontario Greenwashes with ‘Misleading, Illegitimate’ Emission Credits

January 16, 2023
315
Next Post
FMSC/Flickr

Climate-Driven Heat Stress Could Put 80 Million Jobs at Risk by 2030, UN Agency Warns

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}