• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
Celebrating our 1,000th edition. The climate news you need
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  FEATURED
Soaring Fertilizer Prices Could Deliver ‘Silver Lining’ For Emissions, But Farmers Struggle to Limit Use June 26, 2022
BREAKING: UN Nature Summit, the ‘Paris Conference for Biodiversity’, Moves to Montreal in December June 19, 2022
‘LET’S SUE BIG OIL’: Legal Team Launches Class Action Campaign for B.C. Municipalities June 17, 2022
‘It Could Have Been Any of Us’, Colleague Says, After Brazil Confirms Murders of Bruno Pereira, Dom Phillips June 17, 2022
Infrastructure Gap a ‘Life and Death’ Matter as Northern Canada Warms June 17, 2022
Next
Prev
Home Climate & Society Ending Emissions

Biden Promises Net-Zero Emissions by 2050 as ‘Climate Intensity’ Hits U.S. Electorate

June 4, 2019
Reading time: 4 minutes

Marc Nozell/Flickr

Marc Nozell/Flickr

2
SHARES
 

Former U.S. vice president Joe Biden, currently the frontrunner for his party’s 2020 presidential nomination, is pushing back on concerns that he favours a middle-of-the-road response to the climate crisis, with the release Tuesday of a 10-year, US$5-trillion plan aimed at hitting net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.

And while this aspect of his announcement fell off the radar in much of the immediate news coverage, Biden also became the 17th of 22 Democratic candidates to pledge not to knowingly accept campaign donations from fossil interests, Grist reports. In 2008, Democratic nominee Barack Obama received $1 million from oil and gas.

“Biden foresees $1.7 trillion in spending over the next 10 years, and $3.3 trillion in investments by the private sector and state and local governments,” InsideClimate News reports. “That’s about on par with the size of the $5-trillion climate plan of former U.S. Rep. Beto O’Rourke of Texas, who was the first of the Democratic presidential contenders with a detailed climate plan. Both Biden’s and O’Rourke’s plans are about half the size of  [Washington State Gov. Jay] Inslee‘s proposed $3 trillion in federal spending and $6 trillion in private spending over the next decade.”

The net-zero carbon pledge is “in line with what mainstream scientists currently say must be the global target,” InsideClimate adds. “In embracing it, [Biden] proclaimed his support for the central principles, if not all the thorny particulars, of the Green New Deal,” the climate and environmental justice plan released earlier this year by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D, NY) and Sen. Ed Markey (D, MA).

“The sweeping proposal from the typically moderate Mr. Biden demonstrates just how far the Democratic field has moved on climate change,” the New York Times states. His release “came just hours before a rival candidate, Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, released her own climate proposal as part of a $2-trillion green manufacturing plan. Her plan would create a National Institutes of Clean Energy and push federal spending toward American-made renewable energy technology.”

Casting her plan as “economic patriotism”, Warren focused her announcement Tuesday on job creation through a cabinet-level department of economic development, the Times reports. “The bottom line is—if they can make a nickel by sending your job somewhere else, they’ll do it,” Warren told an audience at a job training centre in northwest Detroit. “I’ll tell you, these corporations may not fight for American workers, but I’m willing to do it.”

She said investing in climate change would revive American economies, adding that “we need to be all in to fight this climate crisis”.

Both platforms may be emerging evidence that “climate intensity” is set to sweep public opinion leading up to the United States’ crucial 2020 vote, as it is in other countries. “Democratic pollsters say that in surveys and focus groups, climate change often emerges as the second-most important issue to the party’s primary voters, following health care—a departure from previous presidential campaign cycles when the environment was sometimes an afterthought,” the Times states.

“Climate change is an incredibly important issue for the Democratic base right now,” said Democratic pollster Nick Gourevitch, who told the Times he was unaffiliated with any of the primary campaigns. “It’s about the future, and it’s something that this president [Trump] has made worse in the minds of the Democratic base.”

In the immediate aftermath of Biden’s announcement, there was hope his embrace of the no-fossil-funding pledge could signal a new fundraising standard for Democrats, Grist states. “Biden, as the current frontrunner in the polls, clearly would attract some big money donors,” said David Turnbull, strategic communications director at Oil Change USA, which has orchestrated the no-fossil pledge. “So him taking the pledge is a recognition that the power of the climate movement and the wishes of the Democratic electorate may be growing stronger than the lure of fossil fuel cash.”

More broadly, Biden’s climate platform shows that “the pressure worked,” said Sunrise Movement Executive Director Varshini Prakash. “We forced [Biden’s policy team] to backtrack, and today, he put out a comprehensive climate plan that cites the Green New Deal and names climate change as the greatest challenge facing America and the world.”

Tiernan Sittenfeld, senior vice president for government affairs for the League of Conservation Voters, called the 22-page policy paper a “strong plan” with “ambitious goals” that builds on Biden’s “longtime commitment to a clean energy economy.”

“Biden’s new stance appeared designed to assuage critics who feared, based on early trial balloons, that he planned to stick to the middle of the road on climate policy,” InsideClimate states. Travelling beyond that road meant navigating three challenges: “to inherit the legacy of Obama without playing a figure from the past; to satisfy a highly active and insistent base of primary voters, especially a fickle youth movement, without losing ground to his closest runner-up, Bernie Sanders; and to maintain momentum in Rust Belt swing states from Pennsylvania to Michigan, where Donald Trump’s fossil-fuel-friendly campaign found success over Hillary Clinton in 2016.”

While the plan stops short of endorsing some of the more contentious elements of the Green New Deal, Biden sees it as “a crucial framework for meeting the climate challenges we face,” said his campaign’s online summary of the plan. “Our environment and our economy are completely and totally connected.”

InsideClimate has a comparison of the climate plans released by Democratic nomination candidates to date.



in Ending Emissions, Energy Politics, United States

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

David/flickr
United States

U.S. Supreme Court Expected to Gut Emission Controls as Climate Scientists Petition for Plan B

June 26, 2022
580
Graco/Facebook
Food Security

Soaring Fertilizer Prices Could Deliver ‘Silver Lining’ For Emissions, But Farmers Struggle to Limit Use

June 27, 2022
116
Gustavo Petro Urrego/flickr
Forests & Deforestation

Colombia’s President-Elect Has ‘Ambitious’ Plans to Halt Amazon Deforestation

June 26, 2022
67

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

David/flickr

U.S. Supreme Court Expected to Gut Emission Controls as Climate Scientists Petition for Plan B

June 26, 2022
580
Graco/Facebook

Soaring Fertilizer Prices Could Deliver ‘Silver Lining’ For Emissions, But Farmers Struggle to Limit Use

June 27, 2022
116
Konrad Summers/Kern West Oil Museum via Wikimedia Commons

Imperial Oil Backs Lithium Recovery Project in Alberta’s Leduc Oilfield

June 26, 2022
97
pxhere

Environmental Racism Bill Passes Second Reading in House of Commons

June 26, 2022
79
stockvault

Animal Agriculture Could Reduce Future Pandemic Risk, UK Researchers Say

June 26, 2022
73
Gustavo Petro Urrego/flickr

Colombia’s President-Elect Has ‘Ambitious’ Plans to Halt Amazon Deforestation

June 26, 2022
67

Recent Posts

Adam E. Moreira/wikimedia commons

Suspend Transit Fares, Not Gas Tax, Climate Advocates Urge Biden

June 26, 2022
55
moerschy / Pixabay

Pandemic Drives Up Support for Climate Action, Pessimism About Elected Leaders

June 26, 2022
27
hellomike/flickr

No Public Input as Canada Finalizes Climate Plan for Airlines

June 27, 2022
37
Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung Southeast Asia/wikimedia commons

Japan, Korea Sell Vietnam on Gas Amid Crackdown on Climate Activists

June 26, 2022
22
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/Barrow_Offshore_Wind_Farm

Global Offshore Wind Pipeline Doubles to 846 Gigawatts

June 26, 2022
38
TAFE SA TONSLEY/Flickr

U.S. Renewables Industries Scramble to Reuse, Recycle Before Waste Volumes Skyrocket

June 26, 2022
63
Next Post
bhuman34/Pixabay

Ontario Climate Plan Costs Taxpayers More Than Federal Carbon Tax

The Energy Mix

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}