• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
Danske Bank Quits New Fossil Fuel Financing January 23, 2023
Extreme Warming Ahead Even as Worst-Case Scenarios Grow ‘Obsolete’ January 23, 2023
Notley Scorches Federal Just Transition Bill as Fossil CEO Calls for Oilsands Boom January 23, 2023
IRON OXIDE: New Battery Brings Long-Duration Storage to Grids, 750 Jobs to West Virginia January 23, 2023
BREAKING: GFANZ Banks, Investors Pour Hundreds of Billions into Fossil Fuels January 17, 2023
Next
Prev

Spill Response Only Recovers 15% of the Oil Lost in an Average Marine Spill

May 28, 2019
Reading time: 2 minutes

BeforeItStarts/flickr

BeforeItStarts/flickr

117
SHARES
 

News reports of a recent oil spill recovery drill off the coasts of British Columbia and Washington State are shining a light on an alarming reality: that only about 15% of the oil is recovered after the average marine spill.

“A lot of that is non-recoverable, so it’s either evaporated or it’s dissipated into the water,” said Malcolm Lowry, communications manager with the privately-funded Western Canada Marine Response Corporation (WCMRC), in an interview with the Times Colonist in Victoria. “It’s not necessarily that that other part hasn’t been cleaned up. It’s just been absorbed by the environment.”

  • Concise headlines. Original content. Timely news and views from a select group of opinion leaders. Special extras.
  • Everything you need, nothing you don’t.
  • The Weekender: The climate news you need.
New!
Subscribe

The two-day drill off the coast of Port Angeles, Washington was conducted in a bid to ensure joint preparedness in the event of an oil spill in the Strait of Juan de Fuca, the Colonist reports.

“The primary goals of the drills were to familiarize each country with the other’s response equipment, ensure everyone can communicate to coordinate a response, and test border crossings with equipment and personnel,” the Colonist states. The spill response on the Canadian side was conducted by WCMRC employees, Victoria News reports, with the two coast guards on the scene in a supervisory capacity.

“We work with our vessels a lot,” Lowry told the Colonist, but the Canadian organization doesn’t interact with American vessels very often. “Will the valves connect? Will the pumps work? That’s the kind of stuff they’re testing.”

With thousands of deep sea vessels per year already navigating the international waters off the coasts of British Columbia and Washington state, and the potential for far more oil tanker traffic should the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion be built, worries about the potential for an oil spill are deepening.

Chris Genovali, Sidney, B.C.-based executive director of the Rainforest Conservation Foundation, described the environmental costs of a large spill as “staggering”. He recalled how the 1989 Exxon Valdez disaster off the coast of Alaska immediately devastated area populations of sea otters and seabirds that died of hypothermia, drowning, and poisoning, and likely compromised the health of generations of harbour seals and killer whales.

The response to a similar event along 27,000 kilometres of B.C. coastline has essentially been outsourced to WCMRC. The company is regulated by Transport Canada, but funded by “companies involved in the oil industry, such as oil-handling facilities and large vessels that call at Canadian ports,” The Colonist explains. The company is required to “have enough equipment to be able to clean up 10,000 tonnes of oil in 10 days and 500 metres of beach per day,” the paper adds, with crews instructed to “turn their attention to the shores only after the water has been cleaned.”The WCMRC’s original funders, now its shareholders and financiers, include Trans Mountain, Suncor Energy, Imperial Oil, Shell Canada, and Parkland Fuel, the exclusive marketer for Chevron fuel sold in Canada.



in Biodiversity & Habitat, Canada, Energy Politics, Pipelines / Rail Transport, Supply Chains & Consumption, Water

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

United Nations
Air & Marine

Salvage of $20B ‘Floating Time Bomb’ Delayed by Rising Cost of Oil Tankers

January 27, 2023
12
RL0919/wikimedia commons
Finance & Investment

Danske Bank Quits New Fossil Fuel Financing

January 23, 2023
2.1k
@tongbingxue/Twitter
Ending Emissions

Extreme Warming Ahead Even as Worst-Case Scenarios Grow ‘Obsolete’

January 23, 2023
268

Comments 1

  1. Elaine says:
    4 years ago

    This article states that the oil industry is utilizing a company ‘WCMRC’ for testing the preparedness i event of a spill in B.C.’s Coastal waters.
    WCMRC is regulated by companies in the oil industry!!
    This should not be sanctioned. They have a vested interest in promoting that additional mega-tanker traffic!!
    Good article, Times Colonist

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

RL0919/wikimedia commons

Danske Bank Quits New Fossil Fuel Financing

January 23, 2023
2.1k
@tongbingxue/Twitter

Extreme Warming Ahead Even as Worst-Case Scenarios Grow ‘Obsolete’

January 23, 2023
268
Rachel Notley/Facebook

Notley Scorches Federal Just Transition Bill as Fossil CEO Calls for Oilsands Boom

January 23, 2023
253
James Vincent Wardhaugh/flickr

Canada Sidelines Ontario’s Ring of Fire, Approves Separate Mining Project

December 4, 2022
379
Weirton, WV by Jon Dawson/flickr

IRON OXIDE: New Battery Brings Long-Duration Storage to Grids, 750 Jobs to West Virginia

January 23, 2023
493
United Nations

Salvage of $20B ‘Floating Time Bomb’ Delayed by Rising Cost of Oil Tankers

January 27, 2023
12

Recent Posts

EcoAnalytics

Albertans Want a Just Transition, Despite Premier’s Grumbling

January 23, 2023
188
Sergio Boscaino/flickr

Dubai Mulls Quitting C40 Cities Over ‘Costly’ Climate Target

January 24, 2023
84
hangela/pixabay

New UK Coal Mine Faces Two Legal Challenges

January 24, 2023
43

Gas Stoves Enter U.S. Climate Culture War, Become ‘Bellwether’ for Industry

January 22, 2023
73
Jeff Hitchcock/flickr.

BREAKING: GFANZ Banks, Investors Pour Hundreds of Billions into Fossil Fuels

January 23, 2023
494

Exxon Had the Right Global Warming Numbers Through Decades of Denial: Study

January 17, 2023
223
Next Post
anita_starzycka / Pixabay

Local Fracking Suspended After Earthquake Near Alberta’s Brazeau Reservoir

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}