• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
SPECIAL REPORT: ‘Defuse the Climate Time Bomb’ with Net-Zero by 2040, Guterres Urges G20 March 20, 2023
Devastating Impacts, Affordable Climate Solutions Drive IPCC’s Urgent Call for Action March 20, 2023
Window for 1.5°C ‘Rapidly Closing’, IPCC Warns March 20, 2023
Swift Action, Inclusive Resilience Vital in Face of Overlapping Climate Hazards March 20, 2023
Shift from Fossils to Renewables is Quickest, Cheapest Path to Cut Emissions, IPCC Report Shows March 20, 2023
Next
Prev

B.C. Asks Supreme Court to Overturn Judges’ Decision Against Trans Mountain Regulation

May 26, 2019
Reading time: 5 minutes
Primary Author: The Energy Mix staff

Jamie McCaffrey/flickr

Jamie McCaffrey/flickr

13
SHARES
 

British Columbia is on its way to a Supreme Court of Canada appeal, after the provincial Court of Appeal ruled unanimously against its right to apply environmental regulations to heavy crude shipped through the controversial Trans Mountain pipeline expansion.

“We believe we have the right and authority constitutionally to regulate harmful substances through B.C., however they get here,” Attorney General David Eby said Friday.

  • Be among the first to read The Energy Mix Weekender
  • A brand new weekly digest containing exclusive and essential climate stories from around the world.
  • The Weekender:The climate news you need.
Subscribe

“We’re disappointed with the decision,” he added. “Our government said from the outset that we would stand up for the B.C. environment, economy and coast.”

But “the Supreme Court of Canada has overturned unanimous decisions by the B.C. Court of Appeal in the past,” Eby noted, and “for reference questions like this, provinces have the right to appeal.” He said the dollar cost of the appeal would be a “fraction of a fraction of the cost of a catastrophic diluted bitumen spill.”

In his arguments before the appeal court, provincial lawyer Joseph Arvay had pointed to the array of pipeline, fossil, and railway lawyers standing against him and suggested a common thread in all their arguments, CBC recalls: “That even if the pipelines or railways they own or operate create a risk of even catastrophic environmental harm because of the substance they carry, the province is nevertheless powerless to enact laws to prevent that risk from materializing.” B.C.’s response: “We say that the province is not required to accept such a fate.”

But the panel of five provincial judges ruled the province’s proposed regulations would conflict with federal jurisdiction over interprovincial pipelines. “Even if it were not intended to ‘single out’ the TMX pipeline, it has the potential to affect (and indeed ‘stop in its tracks’) the entire operation of Trans Mountain as an interprovincial carrier and exporter of oil,” the judges concluded, in a 66-page ruling crafted by Justice Mary Newbury.

“At the end of the day, the NEB is the body entrusted with regulating the flow of energy resources across Canada to export markets,” they added. “The project affects the country as a whole, and falls to be regulated taking into account the interests of the country as a whole.”

“B.C. argued the proposed environmental regulations could co-exist with the federal responsibility to oversee railways and pipelines, by ensuring the local environmental risks were governed by the level of government closest to the citizens most affected,” CBC adds. “But Ottawa claimed the rules were just a ‘Trojan Horse’ designed to kill a project B.C.’s NDP government previously vowed to defeat. To reach a decision, the province’s Appeal Court had to determine the ‘pith and substance’ of the law, which includes the purpose and practical effects of the legislation.”

The judges ended up supporting Ottawa’s argument that the proposed regulations were intended to target Trans Mountain. “From this proposition, it is a short step to Canada’s argument that the immediate purpose and undeniable effect…is to provide a means by which the province may impede additional heavy oil originating in Alberta from being transported through British Columbia generally, and thus ‘frustrate’ the project in particular,” they stated.

B.C. Premier John Horgan, who has promised to use every tool in his province’s toolbox to protect coastal waters, said courts must factor in issues of environmental jurisdiction.

“There’s always been a tug and pull in our federation between the supremacy of federal jurisdiction versus that of provincial jurisdiction,” he said. And when comes to the environment, this is an untested area.”

“The issue at the heart of this case goes far beyond a single pipeline project,” added Ecojustice lawyer Kegan Pepper-Smith. “What was at stake is the B.C. government’s ability to step in and enact laws that will better protect communities and the environment when federal measures fall short.”

The Alberta and federal governments were both quick to celebrate the ruling.

“It’s official: Courts have unanimously ruled that B.C. has no authority to ban Alberta oil in a pipeline,” tweeted Alberta Premier Jason Kenney. “@JustinTrudeau, it’s time for you to do the right thing. Stand up for Alberta and all of Canada and build #TMX, now.”

“Turns out BC’s toolbox was more Fisher Price than DeWalt,” agreed provincial opposition leader Rachel Notley. “This is a good day for people with toolboxes all across Canada.”

“It is a core responsibility of the federal government to help get Canada’s natural resources to market and support good, middle-class jobs, but we know that is only possible when we earn public trust by addressing environmental, Indigenous peoples’, and local concerns,” responded Vanessa Adams, press secretary to Natural Resources Minister Amarjeet Sohi.

The judges’ decision notwithstanding, Stand.earth noted that tens of thousands of Canadians are still ready to do “whatever it takes” to stop the project.

“Despite today’s ruling, the fight over the Trans Mountain Pipeline is far from over,” Climate and Energy Campaigner Sven Biggs said in a release. “People care deeply about protecting the B.C. coast, and if Prime Minister Justin Trudeau tries to restart construction on the pipeline, another wave of protests is guaranteed to greet him every time he comes across the Rocky Mountains to B.C.”

Days before the ruling, Tsleil-Waututh Nation leader Will George was giving Prime Minister Justin Trudeau a direct taste of that promise, confronting him during a Liberal Party fundraiser in Vancouver. “You’re a liar and you’re a weak leader,” he said. “Climate leaders don’t build pipelines. We say no,” and “no means no.”

Trudeau thanked George for his intervention, cited his government’s work on ocean protection, carbon pricing, and Indigenous reconciliation, and pointed to “Indigenous voices” supporting the pipeline, CBC reports.

“I know you don’t mean to delegitimize their voices as well,” the PM said. “There is going to be a broad range of perspectives, and our approach as a government, our approach as a country has always been to listen to diverse views, to understand where they’re coming from, what their concerns are, and try to respond as best we can to them.”

The pipeline protest successfully overshadowed Trudeau’s announcement of a C$15.7-billion plan to build 18 new Canadian Coast Guard ships, 16 of them in Vancouver.

“It’s an impressive injection of cash ahead of an election,” CTV News reports. But the TMX protests overshadowed the message, with “skirmishes between police and protesters as well as an arrest essentially hijacking the ‘good news’ announcement.”

“It’s become a climactic battle over climate,” said Simon Fraser University political scientist Stewart Prest. “Within Vancouver proper, there is a real groundswell of opposition that’s going to be vocal, and it’s going to make it perhaps more difficult to hold on to Liberal gains.”



in Canada, Climate Action / "Blockadia", Energy Politics, First Peoples, Legal & Regulatory, Pipelines / Rail Transport, Sub-National Governments, Tar Sands / Oil Sands

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

IFRC Intl. Federation:Twitter
International Agencies & Studies

Devastating Impacts, Affordable Climate Solutions Drive IPCC’s Urgent Call for Action

March 21, 2023
693
U.S. National Park Service/rawpixel
International Agencies & Studies

Window for 1.5°C ‘Rapidly Closing’, IPCC Warns

March 20, 2023
46
FMSC/Flickr
Environmental Justice

Swift Action, Inclusive Resilience Vital in Face of Overlapping Climate Hazards

March 20, 2023
44

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

U.S. Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement/flickr

Willow Oil Project in Alaska Faces Legal Challenges, Economic Doubts

March 19, 2023
391
IFRC Intl. Federation:Twitter

Devastating Impacts, Affordable Climate Solutions Drive IPCC’s Urgent Call for Action

March 21, 2023
693
Kern River Valley Fire Info/Facebook

SPECIAL REPORT: ‘Defuse the Climate Time Bomb’ with Net-Zero by 2040, Guterres Urges G20

March 20, 2023
155
Kenuoene/pixabay

Shift from Fossils to Renewables is Quickest, Cheapest Path to Cut Emissions, IPCC Report Shows

March 20, 2023
97
Secretariat of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine/Wikimedia Commons

IPCC Report Charts a Course for Ottawa’s ‘Clean Technology’ Budget

March 20, 2023
81
@davenewworld_2

Keystone Pipeline Safety Worries Lawmakers after TC Energy Ordered to Reduce Operating Pressure

March 19, 2023
251

Recent Posts

U.S. National Park Service/rawpixel

Window for 1.5°C ‘Rapidly Closing’, IPCC Warns

March 20, 2023
46
FMSC/Flickr

Swift Action, Inclusive Resilience Vital in Face of Overlapping Climate Hazards

March 20, 2023
44
Kiara Worth, UNClimateChange/flickr

Gap Between IPCC’s Science, National Actions Sets Challenge for COP 28

March 20, 2023
46
Photo by IISD/ENB

IPCC Sees Deeper Risk in Overshooting 1.5°C Warming Threshold

March 20, 2023
27
EcoFlight

Historic Deal Reopens B.C. Indigenous Territory to Fracking, Promises Land Restoration

March 19, 2023
432
Wikimedia Commons/Humans of Vanuatu

Six Countries Call for Fossil-Free Pacific

March 19, 2023
42
Next Post
Michael Bäcklund/Instagram

More Than 500 Israeli, Palestinian Students Rally in Jerusalem for Climate Action

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}