• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
Biden Approves $8B Oil Extraction Plan in Ecologically Sensitive Alaska March 14, 2023
U.S. Solar Developers Scramble after Silicon Valley Bank Collapse March 14, 2023
$30.9B Price Tag Makes Trans Mountain Pipeline a ‘Catastrophic Boondoggle’ March 14, 2023
UN Buys Tanker, But Funding Gap Could Scuttle Plan to Salvage Oil from ‘Floating Time Bomb’ March 9, 2023
Biden Cuts Fossil Subsidies, But Oil and Gas Still Lines Up for Billions March 9, 2023
Next
Prev

Reforestation Could Offset 10 Years of Emissions, But Countries Are Behind on Forest, Land Use Promises

February 27, 2019
Reading time: 4 minutes

Downtowngal/Wikimedia Commons

Downtowngal/Wikimedia Commons

19
SHARES
 

After years of severely underestimating the number of trees on Earth, scientists are now calculating that a massive, global reforestation effort could offset at least 10 years of greenhouse gas emissions produced by human activity.

Yet a separate study reported just days later concludes humanity is unlikely to hit its targets to get greenhouse gas emissions under control, at a time when deforestation is still on the rise.

  • Be among the first to read The Energy Mix Weekender
  • A brand new weekly digest containing exclusive and essential climate stories from around the world.
  • The Weekender:The climate news you need.
Subscribe

In the first of the two studies, a team led by British ecologist Dr. Thomas Crowther combined data from ground surveys and satellites to conclude that there are an estimated three trillion trees on the planet—seven times more than the previous NASA estimate—plus space for 1.2 trillion more.

Crowther and colleagues concluded that “undervaluing trees means scientists have also been massively underestimating the potential for forests to combat climate change,” The Independent reports. “The same approach, using machine learning and AI to analyse the enormous data set, allowed the researchers to predict the number of trees that could feasibly be planted in empty patches around the world.”

“There’s 400 gigatons [of carbon sequestration] now, in the three trillion trees, and if you were to scale that up by another trillion trees that’s in the order of hundreds of gigatons captured from the atmosphere—at least 10 years of anthropogenic emissions completely wiped out,” Crowther said. While precise numbers are still under development, that magnitude makes reforestation “our most powerful weapon in the fight against climate change,” he told a recent meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in Washington, DC.

“We are not targeting urban or agricultural areas, just degraded or abandoned lands, and it has the potential to tackle the two greatest challenges of our time—climate change and biodiversity loss,” he added. “It’s a beautiful thing because everyone can get involved. Trees literally just make people happier in urban environments, they improve air quality, water quality, food quality, ecosystem services. It’s such an easy, tangible thing.”

While “full restoration of all sites identified is clearly unrealistic,” The Independent adds, “tree planting is increasingly being recognized as a critical activity to preserve life on Earth.” The United Nations, whose Billion Tree Campaign has already seen 17 billion planted in different parts of the world, renamed the program the Trillion Tree Campaign in light of Crowther’s findings.

But according to a mid-February paper in the journal Nature Climate Change, those efforts aren’t out of the woods yet.

When the Paris Agreement was adopted in 2015, “nearly 100 countries pledged to make their use of land less damaging to the climate, mainly by limiting deforestation rates and boosting forest restocking,” the U.S. Cable News Network (CNN) reports. “But those commitments were unrealistic and need to be stepped up dramatically, according to researchers at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology and the University of Edinburgh, who pointed to inaction by richer countries and a rise in deforestation in several countries since the treaty was signed.”

The continuing increase in deforestation, coupled with the delays in hitting land use targets, may make it impossible to meet the Paris goals, the study team concluded.

“In most cases, little progress has been made, [and] often, the situation has actually worsened in the last three years,” said lead author and Karlsruhe Institute researcher Calum Brown. “Many of the plans for mitigation in the land system were unrealistic in the first place and now threaten to make the Paris target itself unachievable.”

Brown summarized the research in his own detailed post for Carbon Brief.

Brazil saw deforestation increase 29% between 2015 and 2016 after a decade of progress, CNN notes—and before seeing an extreme new government take office with plans to accelerate forest exploitation.  “Palm oil cultivation in Indonesia and Peru has also scuppered deforestation efforts and led to increased emissions rates.”

(In Canada, meanwhile, CBC is raising tough questions about plans to change national accounting practices for forest carbon in a way that would set aside the more than 400 million tonnes of net forest emissions produced by one province, British Columbia, over a two-year span.)

“The commitments were never sufficient, which is bad enough, but also the commitments that have been made are not realistic given the political support they have in general,” said co-author and University of Edinburgh food security specialist Peter Alexander. “We need to find rapid but realistic ways of changing human land use if we are to meet our climate change targets,” but “richer countries have not been leading the way, either in reducing their own emissions or in reducing the pressure on developing nations.”

“Ongoing destruction of tropical forests in Brazil, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and Indonesia is particularly concerning, because these forests store huge quantities of carbon, as well as containing high levels of biodiversity,” added co-author and Karlsruhe Institute professor of land use change Mark Rounsevell. “Attempts to protect these forests have had limited success, and laws against felling have recently been rolled back.”



in Africa, Asia, Biodiversity & Habitat, Brazil, Carbon Levels & Measurement, COP Conferences, Ending Emissions, Forests & Deforestation, International Agencies & Studies, South & Central America

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

U.S. Bureau of Land Management/flickr
Oil & Gas

Biden Approves $8B Oil Extraction Plan in Ecologically Sensitive Alaska

March 14, 2023
118
EcoAnalytics
Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion

Canadians Want Strong Emissions Cap Regulations, Not More Missed Targets

March 14, 2023
126
Behrat/Wikimedia Commons
Clean Electricity Grid

Hawaii Firm Turns Home Water Heaters into Grid Batteries

March 14, 2023
442

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

David Dodge, Green Energy Futures/flickr

U.S. Solar Developers Scramble after Silicon Valley Bank Collapse

March 14, 2023
351
Environmental Defence Canada/flickr

Repsol Abandons Plan to Ship Canadian LNG to Europe

March 17, 2023
193
Rebecca Bollwitt/flickr

Fossils Stay ‘Oily’, Gibsons Sues Big Oil, U.S. Clean Energy Booms, EU Pushes Fossil Phaseout, and Fukushima Disaster was ‘No Accident’

March 14, 2023
181
Joshua Doubek/Wikipedia

No New Jobs Came from Alberta’s $4B ‘Job Creation’ Tax Cut for Big Oil

October 6, 2022
816
U.S. National Transportation Safety Board/flickr

$30.9B Price Tag Makes Trans Mountain Pipeline a ‘Catastrophic Boondoggle’

March 14, 2023
242
Behrat/Wikimedia Commons

Hawaii Firm Turns Home Water Heaters into Grid Batteries

March 14, 2023
442

Recent Posts

U.S. Bureau of Land Management/flickr

Biden Approves $8B Oil Extraction Plan in Ecologically Sensitive Alaska

March 14, 2023
118
EcoAnalytics

Canadians Want Strong Emissions Cap Regulations, Not More Missed Targets

March 14, 2023
126
Raysonho/wikimedia commons

Purolator Pledges $1B to Electrify Last-Mile Delivery

March 14, 2023
81
United Nations

UN Buys Tanker, But Funding Gap Could Scuttle Plan to Salvage Oil from ‘Floating Time Bomb’

March 10, 2023
94
Gage Skidmore/Wikimedia Commons

Biden Cuts Fossil Subsidies, But Oil and Gas Still Lines Up for Billions

March 10, 2023
185
jasonwoodhead23/flickr

First Nation Scorches Imperial Oil, Alberta Regulator Over Toxic Leak

March 8, 2023
376
Next Post
jplenio/pixabay

Another Century of Fossil Use Could Eliminate Cloud Cover, Trigger 8.0°C of Additional Warming

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}