• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
SPECIAL REPORT: ‘Defuse the Climate Time Bomb’ with Net-Zero by 2040, Guterres Urges G20 March 20, 2023
Devastating Impacts, Affordable Climate Solutions Drive IPCC’s Urgent Call for Action March 20, 2023
Window for 1.5°C ‘Rapidly Closing’, IPCC Warns March 20, 2023
Swift Action, Inclusive Resilience Vital in Face of Overlapping Climate Hazards March 20, 2023
Shift from Fossils to Renewables is Quickest, Cheapest Path to Cut Emissions, IPCC Report Shows March 20, 2023
Next
Prev

Ontario Introduces Carbon Tax After Railing Against Carbon Taxes

February 15, 2019
Reading time: 4 minutes

Nicholas Hartmann/wikimedia commons

Nicholas Hartmann/wikimedia commons

12
SHARES
 

The Doug Ford government in Ontario is introducing a carbon tax on large emitters that exceed a yet-to-be-established provincial standard, after launching a lawsuit against the federal floor price on carbon and deliberately gutting the province’s most affordable pathways to a sustainable economy.

Under a plan that is open for consultation until March 28, the province’s proposed “compliance units” will cost C$20 per tonne this year, rising to $50 per tonne by 2022, the Toronto Star reports. That’s a progression drawn from a pan-Canadian climate plan that Ford and his ministers used as a day-to-day foil in last year’s provincial election, and have happily scorned at every opportunity since.

  • The climate news you need. Subscribe now to our engaging new weekly digest.
  • You’ll receive exclusive, never-before-seen-content, distilled and delivered to your inbox every weekend.
  • The Weekender: Succinct, solutions-focused, and designed with the discerning reader in mind.
Subscribe

“This proposal raises an important question: Why is Ontario fighting a price on carbon one day, and proposing one the next?” said Sarah Buchanan, clean economy program manager at Environmental Defence. “What Ontario really needs is a system that is consistent and effective at reducing emissions, not months of posturing, legal battles, and uncertainty around which rules to follow.”

“The big question is why Ford is wasting tax dollars fighting the federal climate plan one day, and proposing a price on pollution for large emitters the next?” agreed provincial Green Party leader Mike Schreiner. “Could it be the Ford government is just covering its back because it knows it will lose the legal challenge against national climate action?”

The provincial announcement Tuesday “said payments collected from large emitters through the program would be placed in a fund that could be used by industry to support greenhouse gas reduction projects,” the Star states. “Ford has repeatedly said a carbon price would hurt the economy and generated controversy last month when he suggested the federal carbon tax would cause a recession. Opponents and economists called his claim baseless.” (Polling since showed the public wasn’t fooled, either.)

“The government can rail against carbon taxes and say how evil they are, but this is basically what they’re doing here,” trying to pre-empt federal action by imposing a minimum carbon price on industry, said Greenpeace Canada Senior Energy Strategist Keith Stewart. “They’re saying polluters are going to have to pay for a small portion of their emissions. They can get that money back to invest in greenhouse gas reductions measures, just like the federal program.”

Ford and his officials “know they’re going to lose” in their attempt to fight the federal plan in court, Stewart added, “so they’re basically bringing in their own version of the federal price to avoid having systems coming and going.”

The provincial release says the plan aims to “provide flexibility for Ontario circumstances as an alternative” to the federal floor price on carbon, National Observer reports.

On Twitter, environmental economist Dave Sawyer compared the proposal to Ontario’s previous cap-and-trade system, noting that both have “product-based benchmarks, historical grandfathering, and energy benchmarks,” and apply to the same sectors of the economy—just like the federal plan.

“Basically the same cap & trade system for large emitters but have added unwinding costs by scrapping cap-and-trade, increased business uncertainty to reduce (greenhouse gases),” and eliminated low-cost reductions available through the Western Climate Initiative, he tweeted.

But if equivalency with the pan-Canadian plan is what Ontario claims to be looking for, the plan may fall short, since it appears to call for intensity-based targets rather than real greenhouse gas reductions.

“It doesn’t appear as though the proposal is designed to reduce pollution in Canada’s most populous province,” Observer notes. “In fact, the long-awaited plan says that it is designed to allow pollution to grow by proposing a new industrial performance standard that would limit the growth in pollution, ‘rather than an absolute cap on emissions for the province.’ This would be done by setting pollution limits based on the level of output or production of facilities.”

The “flexible compliance mechanisms” in the new Ontario system “would allow industrial facilities to receive compliance units as an incentive for reducing their greenhouse gas emissions. The regulation would apply to all the sectors presently under the federal carbon tax, and may see the addition of institutions, greenhouse operators, and the thermal energy supply sector in 2020.”

Observer says the new plan is similar to the cap-and-trade system enacted by the previous Liberal government, and vilified by Ford and his team, to the extent that it rewards companies that reduce emissions and requires higher-polluting businesses to pay the price.

Schreiner said the province released the plan “after months of crying wolf in public about a carbon tax recession” and accused the government of “playing political games with climate action and misleading the people of Ontario” while creating uncertainties for business.

“The NDP favours an effective and transparent cap-and-trade market to reduce emissions and put the burden for change onto big polluters rather than everyday people,” said opposition energy and climate critic Peter Tabuns (NDP, Toronto-Danforth). “Since most of Ford’s plan replicates the federal carbon tax, it’s completely unclear now which of the two plans will go ahead—leading to even more uncertainty for people, business, and investors.”

The day after the release, Observer was out with a detailed explainer on the new provincial plan.



in Canada, Carbon Levels & Measurement, COP Conferences, Energy Politics, Legal & Regulatory, Sub-National Governments

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

Kern River Valley Fire Info/Facebook
International Agencies & Studies

SPECIAL REPORT: ‘Defuse the Climate Time Bomb’ with Net-Zero by 2040, Guterres Urges G20

March 20, 2023
256
IFRC Intl. Federation:Twitter
International Agencies & Studies

Devastating Impacts, Affordable Climate Solutions Drive IPCC’s Urgent Call for Action

March 21, 2023
799
U.S. National Park Service/rawpixel
International Agencies & Studies

Window for 1.5°C ‘Rapidly Closing’, IPCC Warns

March 20, 2023
76

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

U.S. Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement/flickr

Willow Oil Project in Alaska Faces Legal Challenges, Economic Doubts

March 19, 2023
531
IFRC Intl. Federation:Twitter

Devastating Impacts, Affordable Climate Solutions Drive IPCC’s Urgent Call for Action

March 21, 2023
799
Kenuoene/pixabay

Shift from Fossils to Renewables is Quickest, Cheapest Path to Cut Emissions, IPCC Report Shows

March 20, 2023
212
Kern River Valley Fire Info/Facebook

SPECIAL REPORT: ‘Defuse the Climate Time Bomb’ with Net-Zero by 2040, Guterres Urges G20

March 20, 2023
256
Secretariat of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine/Wikimedia Commons

IPCC Report Charts a Course for Ottawa’s ‘Clean Technology’ Budget

March 21, 2023
142
NTSB

Ohio Train Derailment, Toxic Chemical Spill Renews Fears Over Canada-U.S. Rail Safety

March 8, 2023
1.5k

Recent Posts

U.S. National Park Service/rawpixel

Window for 1.5°C ‘Rapidly Closing’, IPCC Warns

March 20, 2023
76
FMSC/Flickr

Swift Action, Inclusive Resilience Vital in Face of Overlapping Climate Hazards

March 20, 2023
69
Kiara Worth, UNClimateChange/flickr

Gap Between IPCC’s Science, National Actions Sets Challenge for COP 28

March 21, 2023
73
Photo by IISD/ENB

IPCC Sees Deeper Risk in Overshooting 1.5°C Warming Threshold

March 20, 2023
48
EcoFlight

Historic Deal Reopens B.C. Indigenous Territory to Fracking, Promises Land Restoration

March 19, 2023
449
Wikimedia Commons/Humans of Vanuatu

Six Countries Call for Fossil-Free Pacific

March 19, 2023
51
Next Post

Melting polar ice sheets will alter weather

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}