• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
Biden Approves $8B Oil Extraction Plan in Ecologically Sensitive Alaska March 14, 2023
U.S. Solar Developers Scramble after Silicon Valley Bank Collapse March 14, 2023
$30.9B Price Tag Makes Trans Mountain Pipeline a ‘Catastrophic Boondoggle’ March 14, 2023
UN Buys Tanker, But Funding Gap Could Scuttle Plan to Salvage Oil from ‘Floating Time Bomb’ March 9, 2023
Biden Cuts Fossil Subsidies, But Oil and Gas Still Lines Up for Billions March 9, 2023
Next
Prev

A Carbon Tax Rebate in Every Mailbox as Trudeau Unveils Federal Backstop

October 23, 2018
Reading time: 5 minutes
Primary Author: Mitchell Beer @mitchellbeer

Justin Trudeau/Twitter

Justin Trudeau/Twitter

37
SHARES
 

Households in Manitoba, New Brunswick, Ontario, and Saskatchewan will receive carbon tax rebate cheques under a plan unveiled yesterday by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau that will extend the federal floor price on carbon to provinces that don’t introduce their own carbon pricing schemes.

“The science is unequivocal: putting a price on pollution is one of the best ways to move forward,” Trudeau told media and Humber College students in Etobicoke North, the riding held provincially by Premier Doug Ford and federally by Science and Sport Minister Kirsty Duncan.

  • Be among the first to read The Energy Mix Weekender
  • A brand new weekly digest containing exclusive and essential climate stories from around the world.
  • The Weekender:The climate news you need.
Subscribe

“The problem exists because your political leaders have done far too little about this,” Trudeau added. “Will we kick this can down the road yet again? Or will we show some courage to do what needs to be done?”

The federal “backstop” plan, long promised under the pan-Canadian climate program, will result in average “incentive” payments next year of C$248 in New Brunswick, $300 in Ontario, $336 in Manitoba, and $598 in Saskatchewan. By 2022, when the federal floor price hits $50 per tonne, average rebates will total $583 in New Brunswick, $697 in Ontario, $797 in Manitoba, and $1,419 in Saskatchewan.

In every year and in each of the four provinces, that average household will get more money back in rebates than it pays out in carbon taxes—a calculation made possible by a federal plan that imposes the tax on both households and businesses, but only returns any of the funds it collects to households.

“The first cheques will be sent out by next summer, meaning they will arrive well before the federal election in which the carbon tax and how parties address climate change are expected to be major issues,” the Globe and Mail notes, citing a federal official. “The vast majority of the revenue collected will be rebated on a per capita basis, but some small portion of it will be used for programs to help households and businesses reduce their energy use, and to provide additional help for rural people who are heavily dependent on diesel.”

Most Canadians, but not all, will come out ahead under the new system.

“While Trudeau insisted that the carbon tax and the payment program will be revenue-neutral for the federal government, a government official at a technical briefing for journalists acknowledged that some Canadians—about 30% of them—will pay more a year in carbon taxes than they stand to gain from the new backstop program,” CBC explains. “The official said these people are more likely to be wealthier Canadians who have to heat bigger homes or fuel larger vehicles.”

But “a sizeable majority of Canadians receiving the federal payments—the other 70% in those provinces without carbon pricing plans of their own—will receive more in climate payments than they’ll pay each year through the new carbon tax.”

Conservative leader Andrew Scheer and Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe called the announcement a pre-election gimmick, while Ford took umbrage at Trudeau venturing to Ford Nation country to unveil the program. But Climate Action Network-Canada Executive Director Catherine Abreu lauded Trudeau for refusing to “bow to industry pressure and provincial politicking” and keeping his promise to implement a national carbon price.

“The latest UN climate report makes it clear that climate change is a health emergency and carbon pricing is a critical way of addressing that emergency,” Abreu said. “Political leaders in provinces and in Ottawa who continue to pretend pollution is free and score cheap points with the denial of climate action are doing a criminal disservice to Canadians.”

“The government is taking the right approach, ensuring Canadians are incentivized to cut pollution—but aren’t punished if they can’t,” agreed Clean Energy Canada Executive Director Merran Smith. “Putting a price on pollution works. It cuts pollution and spurs innovation in our economy. We have seen this in B.C., Quebec, and many other jurisdictions in North America and around the world, so it’s an important addition to the federal government’s policy toolkit.”

Smith added that, “while there aren’t many politicians in Canada who still deny the science of climate change, many still deny that there are practical solutions—or simply refuse to show their hand. Frankly, that’s just as reckless.”

“Pollution isn’t free,” said Pembina Institute Federal Policy Director Isabelle Turcotte. “Pricing pollution will make our air cleaner, creating healthier communities while ensuring equity for all Canadians.”

Turcotte added that “a well-designed price on carbon, like we’re seeing in the announcement today, brings investment certainty to the Canadian economy in a way that is fair and balanced. It holds polluters to account, while distributing revenue back to Canadians, their communities, and protecting lower-income households. Pricing pollution incentivizes Canadian companies to innovate and build on our already thriving cleantech sector to ensure Canada remains competitive as the global economy changes.”

In a news analysis published hours after Trudeau’s announcement, CBC says the Liberals “learned the hard way back in 2008 that running a campaign around a promise to introduce a new tax is a recipe for electoral failure.” That was when party leader and environmental champion Stéphane Dion introduced an ambitious Green Shift program, but was “pummeled in that campaign” for his inability to show that the plan was revenue-neutral.

A decade later, “Trudeau is a better communicator than Dion,” CBC notes. “And climate change is a problem Canadians understand better today than they did 10 years back. They’ve witnessed the devastating aftermath of the severe storms, droughts, and forest fires that scientists attribute, at least in part, to a warming planet.”

But even so, “call it a price on pollution or call it a tax on everything—either way, politicians on both sides of the debate know that the best way to earn people’s votes is by leaving more money in their pockets,” writes National Affairs Editor Chris Hall. And “this is an argument only one side can win,” a reality Hall says Trudeau acknowledged by bringing the announcement to Ford’s riding.

“Let me be very clear. The government of Canada will return all of the money collected through pricing pollution back to Canadians,” the PM said. “Every nickel will be invested in Canadians in the province where it was raised.”



in Canada, Carbon Levels & Measurement, Community Climate Finance, Ending Emissions, Energy Politics, Sub-National Governments

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

David Dodge, Green Energy Futures/flickr
Community Climate Finance

U.S. Solar Developers Scramble after Silicon Valley Bank Collapse

March 14, 2023
138
EcoAnalytics
Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion

Canadians Want Strong Emissions Cap Regulations, Not More Missed Targets

March 14, 2023
102
U.S. National Transportation Safety Board/flickr
Pipelines / Rail Transport

$30.9B Price Tag Makes Trans Mountain Pipeline a ‘Catastrophic Boondoggle’

March 14, 2023
185

Comments 2

  1. Dave Ferguson says:
    4 years ago

    Meanwhile we keep cranking out the bitumen, LNG, dirty coal for export; who pays the carbon tax on that?

    Reply
  2. James Supple says:
    4 years ago

    We need several stories on how much MORE people and businesses can save by reducing or switching away from purchases of items that use a lot of carbon – e.g. electrification, local, energy efficient, food choice, small, public transit, minimum waste, etc

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Behrat/Wikimedia Commons

Hawaii Firm Turns Home Water Heaters into Grid Batteries

March 14, 2023
391
U.S. National Transportation Safety Board/flickr

$30.9B Price Tag Makes Trans Mountain Pipeline a ‘Catastrophic Boondoggle’

March 14, 2023
185
David Dodge, Green Energy Futures/flickr

U.S. Solar Developers Scramble after Silicon Valley Bank Collapse

March 14, 2023
138
EcoAnalytics

Canadians Want Strong Emissions Cap Regulations, Not More Missed Targets

March 14, 2023
102
moerschy / Pixabay

Fringe Conspiracy Theories Target 15-Minute City Push in Edmonton, Toronto

February 22, 2023
1.6k
U.S. Bureau of Land Management/flickr

Biden Approves $8B Oil Extraction Plan in Ecologically Sensitive Alaska

March 14, 2023
84

Recent Posts

Raysonho/wikimedia commons

Purolator Pledges $1B to Electrify Last-Mile Delivery

March 14, 2023
64
United Nations

UN Buys Tanker, But Funding Gap Could Scuttle Plan to Salvage Oil from ‘Floating Time Bomb’

March 10, 2023
90
Gage Skidmore/Wikimedia Commons

Biden Cuts Fossil Subsidies, But Oil and Gas Still Lines Up for Billions

March 10, 2023
179
jasonwoodhead23/flickr

First Nation Scorches Imperial Oil, Alberta Regulator Over Toxic Leak

March 8, 2023
369
MarcusObal/wikimedia commons

No Climate Risk Targets for Banks, New Guides for Green Finance as 2 Federal Agencies Issue New Rules

March 8, 2023
237
FMSC/Flickr

Millions Face Food Insecurity as Horn of Africa Braces for Worst Drought Ever

March 8, 2023
249
Next Post

Doubled raw materials use is climate risk

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}