• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
Wind and Solar Cheaper than Gas Plants in Ontario and Alberta, Study Shows February 7, 2023
AI Predicts World Over 1.5°C Limit by 2030, Undercuts Climate Progress Reports February 7, 2023
February Brings Record Cold, Widespread Power Outages to Much of North America February 7, 2023
Solar Geoengineering Banned in Mexico After ‘Rogue’ Stunt February 7, 2023
Lithium Mine Divides Nemaska Cree Over Impacts, Benefits February 7, 2023
Next
Prev

Exxon Sends $1 Million to Carbon Tax Lobby That Would End Climate Litigation

October 11, 2018
Reading time: 5 minutes

ClimateTruth.org

ClimateTruth.org

1
SHARES
 

ExxonMobil is donating US$1 million over two years to Americans for Carbon Dividends, a non-profit founded by former U.S. treasury secretary James Baker III and secretary of state George Shultz that is proposing a $40-per-tonne tax on carbon dioxide.

But while the measure would increase the cost of Exxon’s product, the contribution isn’t as surprising—or philanthropic—as it seems at first glance.

  • Concise headlines. Original content. Timely news and views from a select group of opinion leaders. Special extras.
  • Everything you need, nothing you don’t.
  • The Weekender: The climate news you need.
Subscribe

“Recently, ExxonMobil joined the Climate Leadership Council, which was created to develop the Baker-Shultz plan, under which a carbon tax would be established at $40 a ton and increase steadily over time,” the Washington Post reports. “The revenue would be returned to Americans on an equal and monthly basis via dividend checks, direct deposits, or contributions to their individual retirement accounts,” and “there would be border adjustments to ensure fair trade.”

But there’s a very big catch: the group’s plan for “regulatory simplification” includes “an end to federal and state tort liability for emitters,” a small detail that would cut short a wave of liability cases confronting colossal fossils like Exxon for their role in knowingly causing climate change.

Exxon still received bipartisan accolades for the donation. Americans for Carbon Dividends senior advisor Mark McKinnon, a veteran Republican operative who worked for George W. Bush, called it “a watershed moment,” adding that “with their participation, you’ll see a lot of other corporations who have been closely watching this process decide the time is right for them to lend their support, as well.”

“A company getting behind its product being taxed is a very rare thing,” added Harvard economist Lawrence Summers, and former treasury secretary under President Barack Obama. “This reflects a new and important awareness that we have to do big things about climate.”

Yet “the size of the donation isn’t large by ExxonMobil standards,” the Post notes. “The company spends that much on its capital investment program every 20 minutes or so. And a carbon tax faces widespread opposition in Congress.”

Kert Davies, director of the Climate Investigations Center, said Exxon has been backing the plan from the start, but is only now supporting it publicly. “The most interesting thing to me is how Exxon has been behind this the whole way but was intentionally hidden from view,” he toldClimate Liability News. “Are they shy? No, they know the optics.”

In a 14-part Twitter rant, Harvard and MIT post-doctoral researcher Geoffrey Supran has more on those optics.

“Recently, Exxon pledged to give $1 million over 2 yrs to support a carbon tax advocacy group. The reporting on this has been breathless & glowing, and for Exxon’s PR team, a terrific return on investment. But let’s pull back the curtain a bit on this carbon tax plan,” he writes.

“First, this is straight-up PR. Exxon’s announcement comes one day after the #IPCC’s #1o5C report warned the world that hundreds of millions of people will die if we don’t get off fossil fuels, starting yesterday.

“On 8 Oct, the headlines were ‘IPCC climate change report calls for urgent action to phase out fossil fuels’. On 9 Oct they were ‘ExxonMobil gives $1 million to promote a carbon tax-and-dividend plan’. This is PR Crisis Management 101: Change the narrative.

“Exxon’s pledged $500k/y over 2yrs is way less than Exxon spends on basically anything else: drilling; climate denial via ‘think tanks’ & politicians; anti-clean energy & pro-oil subsidy lobbying; anti-carbon pricing legislation (yep!); probably paper clips. h/t @david_turnbull.

“Second, it now appears that this carbon tax plan—originally publicized as ‘The Baker-Schultz Plan’, the brainchild of Very Serious People in the GOP—is actually Exxon’s Trojan Horse.

“Head of PR for the carbon tax advocacy org that Exxon will fund is Richard Keil, a former senior PR advisor for…Exxon. Keil is managing director for Hill+Knowlton, the firm that represented tobacco companies as they tried to escape liability. This is a well-oiled strategy.

“Third, this carbon tax plan is not a strategy for tackling climate change. It is an industry-led gambit to get fossil fuel companies off the hook for billions in climate damages and denial, while making the market more predictable so they can keep profiting from oil and gas.

“Many reporters have casually brushed over the bit in Exxon’s plan that calls for rollback of regulations and an end to climate lawsuits. This is straight out of Big Tobacco’s playbook (& asbestos & guns). To ignore it is to misunderstand the political economy of a carbon tax.

“(Some reporters may have been taken in by the PR massaging of the Baker-Shultz Plan: ‘Significant Regulatory Rollback’ and ‘End to tort liability for emitters’ has become ‘Regulatory Simplification’ and ‘Liability Rationalization’ (Euphemism of the Year?).) h/t @KertDavies.

“Exxon’s proposal of a modest, isolated carbon tax simply isn’t commensurate with the scale and speed of climate collapse. Asked during the IPCC press conference on Sunday if a carbon price alone would fix things, two IPCC scientists literally started laughing.

“As @JesseJenkins, @drvox and others have articulated better than I can, a low-value, isolated carbon tax that polls badly is never going to cut it. Exxon’s proposed tax is 10 to 1,000 times smaller than what the IPCC just said may be necessary to stay below 1.5C.

“Who knows, maybe I’m too cynical. But my research (and others’) shows that #ExxonKnew for decades about the looming climate crisis, then spent decades and millions of dollars working with PR firms to mislead the public about the science.

“As with the science of climate change itself, the evidence on Exxon’s history of climate tactics points only one way. IMHO, that puts the burden of proof on them to dispel skepticism about their motives. So far, they’re not doing a very good job.

“I’ll give final the word to @drvox: ‘Democrats don’t often act like it, but they are right on climate change. They’re on the right side of history. That’s why fossil fuel companies are reaching out to, ahem, end the impasse. It’s what you do when you’re losing…

“’…Dems should have the courage of their convictions, support the policies they believe most able to pass and most likely to work, and begin negotiations there, not where fossil fuel lobbyists draw the line.’”



in Energy / Carbon Pricing & Economics, Energy Politics, Legal & Regulatory, Oil & Gas, United States

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

Peoplepoweredbyenergy/Wikimedia Commons
Ending Emissions

Wind and Solar Cheaper than Gas Plants in Ontario and Alberta, Study Shows

February 7, 2023
306
The hottest summer days in a typical New York City year are now about 11 times more frequent than in the 19th century. Image: Andreas Komodromos via Flickr
Carbon Levels & Measurement

AI Predicts World Over 1.5°C Limit by 2030, Undercuts Climate Progress Reports

February 7, 2023
82
Andre Carrotflower/wikimedia commons
Severe Storms & Flooding

February Brings Record Cold, Widespread Power Outages to Much of North America

February 7, 2023
45

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Peoplepoweredbyenergy/Wikimedia Commons

Wind and Solar Cheaper than Gas Plants in Ontario and Alberta, Study Shows

February 7, 2023
306
Beckyq6937/Wikimedia Commons

Solar Geoengineering Banned in Mexico After ‘Rogue’ Stunt

February 7, 2023
131
Michael E. Brunk/flickr

Green Building ‘Heroes’, Climate Contrarian ‘Zombies’, Shell Lawsuits, and ‘Sponge Cities’ to Solve Flooding

February 7, 2023
112
Peter Broster/wikimedia commons

Ottawa Mulls Higher-Speed Trains on Busy Toronto-Quebec City Corridor

February 7, 2023
98
The hottest summer days in a typical New York City year are now about 11 times more frequent than in the 19th century. Image: Andreas Komodromos via Flickr

AI Predicts World Over 1.5°C Limit by 2030, Undercuts Climate Progress Reports

February 7, 2023
82
Brian Robert Marshall/Geograph

Canada’s Solid Renewables Growth Falls Short of Net-Zero Ambitions

February 7, 2023
76

Recent Posts

Andre Carrotflower/wikimedia commons

February Brings Record Cold, Widespread Power Outages to Much of North America

February 7, 2023
45
Nemaska Lithium/Facebook

Lithium Mine Divides Nemaska Cree Over Impacts, Benefits

February 7, 2023
28
Mike Mozart/Flickr

BP Predicts Faster Oil and Gas Decline as Clean Energy Spending Hits $1.1T in 2022

February 4, 2023
366
Gina Dittmer/PublicDomainPictures

Canada Needs Oil and Gas Emissions Cap to Hit 2030 Goal: NZAB

January 31, 2023
214
CONFENIAE

Ecuador’s Amazon Drilling Plan Shows Need for Fossil Non-Proliferation Treaty

January 31, 2023
82
Ken Teegardin www.SeniorLiving.Org/flickr

Virtual Power Plants Hit an ‘Inflection Point’

January 31, 2023
142
Next Post
U.S. Department of State/WikimediaCommons

Ex-U.S. Climate Envoy Warns Against ‘Backsliding’ on Paris Implementation

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}