• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
Celebrating our 1,000th edition. The climate news you need
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  FEATURED
Ex-Fossil Workers Convert Old Oilfields to Solar Farms After ‘Rapid Upskilling’ in Alberta June 29, 2022
London Becomes Biggest City to Sign Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty June 29, 2022
G7 Miss ‘Golden Opportunity’, Walk Back Pledge to Cut International Fossil Finance June 29, 2022
Soaring Fertilizer Prices Could Deliver ‘Silver Lining’ For Emissions, But Farmers Struggle to Limit Use June 26, 2022
BREAKING: UN Nature Summit, the ‘Paris Conference for Biodiversity’, Moves to Montreal in December June 19, 2022
Next
Prev
Home Jurisdictions Arctic & Antarctica

Alarming Findings in IPCC Report Become ‘Thunderous Call to Action’

October 7, 2018
Reading time: 6 minutes
Primary Author: Mitchell Beer @mitchellbeer

dtdchange/Twitter

dtdchange/Twitter

30
SHARES
 

With representatives of more than 130 countries and about 50 scientists gathered in Incheon, South Korea to negotiate final details of the IPCC’s 1.5°C science report, the Washington Post headlined that they were “struggling to find the right words for very bad news.”

“Things that scientists have been saying would happen further in the future are happening now,” Greenpeace International Executive Director Jennifer Morgan told AFP. “We thought we had more time, but we don’t.”

“Many scientists have long known that human-induced climate change could have dire consequences,” added former IPCC vice-chair Jean-Pascal van Ypersele, now a professor of climatology at France’s Université Catholique de Louvain. “Those who have underestimated the severity of climate change are mostly policy-makers.”

Now, the IPCC report has swept much of that history away, shining a spotlight on 1.5°C as the only target that offers legitimate odds of averting the worst effects of climate change.

“At issue is what scientists call the ‘carbon budget’: Because carbon dioxide lives in the atmosphere for so long, there’s only a limited amount that can be emitted before it becomes impossible to avoid a given temperature, like 1.5°C,” the Post explains. “And since the world emits about 41 billion tons of carbon dioxide per year, if the remaining budget is 410 billion tons (for example), then scientists can say we have 10 years until the budget is gone and 1.5°C is locked in.”

That is, “unless emissions start to decline—which gives more time. This is why scenarios for holding warming to 1.5°C require rapid and deep changes to how we get energy.” By the same token, “if we can’t cut other gases—such as methane—or if the Arctic permafrost starts emitting large volumes of additional gases, then the budget gets even narrower.”

The 1.5°C target was originally included in the Paris Agreement, essentially as an aspirational goal, “at the behest of small island nations and other highly vulnerable countries.,” the Post recalls. “But it is increasingly being regarded by all as a key guardrail, as severe climate change effects have been felt in just the past five years—raising concerns about what a little bit more warming would bring.”

Taking that recent experience into account, 2.0°C “increasingly seems disastrous,” write Post climate specialists Chris Mooney and Brady Dennis.

“Parts of the planet, like the Arctic, have already warmed beyond 1.5° and are seeing alarming changes. Antarctica and Greenland, containing many feet of sea level rise, are wobbling. Major die-offs have hit coral reefs around the globe, suggesting an irreplaceable planetary feature could soon be lost,” they write. Yet “It is universally recognized that the pledges made in Paris would lead to a warming far beyond 1.5°—more like 2.5 or 3.0°C, or even more,” and that was before the Trump administration withdrew the United States from the Paris deal.

“The pledges countries made during the Paris climate accord don’t get us anywhere close to what we have to do,” said IPCC co-author and Duke University climate specialist Drew Shindell. “They haven’t really followed through with actions to reduce their emissions in any way commensurate with what they profess to be aiming for.”

Grist columnist and veteran climate hawk Eric Holthaus echoes the urgency behind the report, citing the previously-leaked conclusion that world greenhouse gas emissions must peak by 2020—just 15 months from now—and IPCC Chair Hoesung Lee’s comment in his opening address last week that “this will be one of the most important meetings in the IPCC’s history.”

The UN’s preview of the report laid out a pathway to 1.5°C, though it didn’t candy-coat the depth of the challenge: “The transition ‘requires very fast changes in electricity production, transport, construction, agriculture, and industry’ worldwide,” Holthaus writes, “in a globally coordinated effort to bring about a zero-carbon economy as quickly as possible. It would also very likely require eventually removing huge amounts of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere using technology that is not currently available at the scale that would be necessary.”

And “there’s no time to waste: ‘The longer CO2 is emitted at today’s rate, the faster this decarbonization will need to be.’”

Now, the focus will shift to countries’ practical response to the report.

“In this age of rapid warming, the IPCC report is inherently political—there are obvious winners and losers if the world fails to meet the 1.5°C goal,” Holthaus writes. “If the world’s governments were to take the implications of IPCC’s findings seriously, it would be nothing less than revolutionary—a radical restructuring of human society on our planet.”

Much of the discussion leading up to last week’s meetings focused on the difference in human and ecological impacts between average global warming of 1.5 and 2.0°C—and looking back over that coverage, an outsized share of the emerging story was pulled together by Carbon Brief, an award-winning specialty publication based in the UK. This week, Carbon Brief is out with an extensive, interactive feature summarizing the results of about 70 scientific papers on the topic. Notable points (among many others) include:

  • Sea levels rise an average of 48 centimetres by 2100 at 1.5°C, 56 centimetres at 2.0°.
  • Total days of marine heat waves per year increase 16-fold at 1.5°C, 23-fold at 2.0°C, and 41-fold at 3.5°C.
  • The probability of at least one ice-free Arctic summer is 10% at 1.5°, 80% at 2.0°C, and 100% at 3.0°C.
  • Annual hot days increase 16% at 1.5°C and 25% at 2.0°C. The duration of warm spells increases by 17 and 35 days.
  • The population exposed to extreme drought increases by 132.5 million at 1.5°C and 194.5 million at 2.0°C.
  • Global per capita GDP falls 8% at 1.5°C and 13% at 2.0°C.

Vox.com correspondent Umair Irfan casts the report as “a thunderous call to action, laying out what tools we have at our disposal (we have plenty) to mitigate global warming and to accelerate the turn toward cleaner energy.” Leaked drafts of the report concluded that “all mitigation pathways compatible with limiting global warming to 1.5°C by 2100 involve removal of CO2 from the atmosphere,” despite a handful of recent modelling studies that indicated otherwise.

The Daily Mail sees the IPCC report triggering “renewed calls for dramatic action” on the part of the world’s governments, aimed at bringing greenhouse gas emissions to zero by 2050. “That would mean an end to burning fossil fuels to generate power, the replacement of petrol and diesel cars with electric vehicles or other clean alternatives, and no more gas boilers to heat homes, in just a few decades,” the Mail states. “Scientists have also warned that protecting and restoring forests will be key to cutting carbon and drawing down excess emissions from the atmosphere.”

“This report proves that keeping global temperatures to 1.5°C is a necessity, not an ambition,” said Neil Thorns, advocacy director at the UK’s Catholic Agency for Overseas Development (CAFOD). “Faced with such information, we cannot leave poor communities standing on the front line of this potential storm. We must act urgently.”



in Arctic & Antarctica, Biodiversity & Habitat, Carbon Levels & Measurement, Climate Impacts & Adaptation, COP Conferences, Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise, Methane, Oceans, United States

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

Keith Hirsche
Jobs & Training

Ex-Fossil Workers Convert Old Oilfields to Solar Farms After ‘Rapid Upskilling’ in Alberta

June 29, 2022
392
Number 10/flickr
International Agencies & Studies

G7 Miss ‘Golden Opportunity’, Walk Back Pledge to Cut International Fossil Finance

June 29, 2022
142
AJEL / Pixabay
Food Security

Windfall Tax on Food, Fossil, Pharma Giants Would Raise $490B to Solve ‘Catastrophic’ Food Crisis: Oxfam

June 29, 2022
57

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Keith Hirsche

Ex-Fossil Workers Convert Old Oilfields to Solar Farms After ‘Rapid Upskilling’ in Alberta

June 29, 2022
392
François GOGLINS/wikimedia commons

Corrosion Problem Shutters Half of France’s Nuclear Reactors

June 29, 2022
223
David/flickr

U.S. Supreme Court Expected to Gut Emission Controls as Climate Scientists Petition for Plan B

June 26, 2022
1.2k
Danielle Scott/flickr

Advocate Urges Ottawa to Intervene Before Ontario Builds Highway 413

June 29, 2022
128
Number 10/flickr

G7 Miss ‘Golden Opportunity’, Walk Back Pledge to Cut International Fossil Finance

June 29, 2022
142
London Eye UK England

London Becomes Biggest City to Sign Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty

June 29, 2022
120

Recent Posts

AJEL / Pixabay

Windfall Tax on Food, Fossil, Pharma Giants Would Raise $490B to Solve ‘Catastrophic’ Food Crisis: Oxfam

June 29, 2022
57
futureatlas.com/flickr

Ottawa Demands Deeper Fuel Emissions Cuts, Offers Fossils a Double-Dip on Tax Breaks

June 29, 2022
77
Province of B.C./flickr

Comox Joins Municipalities Seeking Ban on New Gas Stations

June 29, 2022
75
/Piqsels

Refocus Agriculture Spending to Cut Emissions, Boost Productivity, OECD Urges Governments

June 29, 2022
28
Jimmy Emerson, DVM/flickr

Public Vigilance Key to Protecting Greenbelts for Climate Resilience, Report Finds

June 29, 2022
35
Miguel V/Wikimedia Commons

Forests Fall Short of Full Carbon Storage Potential, Study Finds

June 29, 2022
62
Next Post
Mohammed Bin Salman/Facebook

Saudi Arabia Made Best Efforts to Stall IPCC Science Report

The Energy Mix

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}