• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
Celebrating our 1,000th edition. The climate news you need
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  FEATURED
BREAKING: UN Nature Summit, the ‘Paris Conference for Biodiversity’, Moves to Montreal in December June 19, 2022
‘LET’S SUE BIG OIL’: Legal Team Launches Class Action Campaign for B.C. Municipalities June 17, 2022
‘It Could Have Been Any of Us’, Colleague Says, After Brazil Confirms Murders of Bruno Pereira, Dom Phillips June 17, 2022
Infrastructure Gap a ‘Life and Death’ Matter as Northern Canada Warms June 17, 2022
Ban Fossil Fuel Ads Like Tobacco Promos, Doctors Urge Ottawa June 10, 2022
Next
Prev
Home Demand & Distribution Cities & Communities

Southeastern U.S. Utility Actively Undermines Solar, Increases Energy Poverty

August 26, 2018
Reading time: 3 minutes

EcoStrategy

EcoStrategy

 

An Alabama utility’s punitive fees against small-scale solar users who seek to remain connected to the grid are an example of a regulatory climate throughout the economically-depressed southeastern United States that is actively contributing to energy poverty, according to a Grist report recently republished by Resilience.org.

Such is the experience solar installer and former career coal miner Chuck Jay, who found himself—and a new customer—“blindsided” by the new fee of between US$25 and $30 per month for the privilege of staying connected to the grid, “just as his business was getting off the ground.”

Although that customer chose to push ahead with the installation, the new grid charge has cast a cloud over Jay’s business, burning up “nearly all the money his customers would save by going solar”—which matters hugely in a state “with the second-highest average monthly bill in the country in 2016, right behind South Carolina,” with low-and middle-income householders hit particularly hard.

In large metropolitan areas, and especially in the southeast, “the share of income that goes towards energy can be up to three times higher for low-income people than for their higher-income peers,” Resilience notes.

That makes it all the more important for customers to produce their own power and sell back the excess on sunny days, while still relying on the grid when their local solar generation falls short.

The Southern Environmental Law Center (SELC), which in April filed a complaint against Alabama Power with the state regulator, called the fee “unfair, unreasonable, unjust, discriminatory, contrary to the public interest, and otherwise unlawful.”

“Anything that makes it less economical for people to go solar is going to be harmful for low- and median-income consumers,” agreed Greer Ryan, a renewable energy specialist at the Arizona-based Center for Biological Diversity. “It’s like raising taxes on people who can least afford it—putting green energy out of reach for everyone but the wealthy.”

SELC senior attorney Katie Ottenweller said the up-front costs of solar installations in Alabama average $14,000, “a tough sell in a state where 16% of the population lives in poverty.”

And while some states are working to break the mutually reinforcing cycle of economic and energy poverty—California, for example, has ordered three utilities to fund solar installation subsidies for low-income households—“other states are responding with pushback or inaction, especially in the southeast,” Resilience states.

For example, neither Alabama nor Tennessee requires mandatory net metering by utilities, a regulation which would “allow solar customers to sell extra energy from their rooftop panels back to the grid.” Alabama also lacks “clear policies on solar leasing, making it harder for customers to take advantage of a common arrangement in which they pay a monthly flat fee to lease equipment rather than buy it all up front.” Without those policies in place, she told Grist, “rooftop solar remains out of reach for many.”

Ryan also pointed to the way utilities are structured, noting that “Alabama is one of many states with a ‘regulated’ energy market,” a misnomer for a structure which grants utility companies “a monopoly over all stages of the electricity market, from production to distribution as well as marketing and sales.” Should such utilities discourage residential solar, “residents have few alternatives”.

Which is a shame, Ryan noted in an email to Resilience, because rooftop solar does more than provide low-carbon energy. “Solar power owned directly by the people and neighbourhoods who use it creates local jobs, reduces polluting emissions, and can save individuals money.”

The sheer scale of that opportunity was captured in a National Renewable Energy Laboratory study earlier this year, which found that low- and middle-income rooftops account for 42% of the country’s residential solar potential.



in Cities & Communities, Clean Electricity Grid, Ending Emissions, Energy Politics, Energy Subsidies, Environmental Justice, Jobs & Training, Legal & Regulatory, Solar, Sub-National Governments, United States

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

Jason Woodhead/Flickr
Pipelines / Rail Transport

Trans Mountain Pipeline On Track to Lose $600 Million, Parliamentary Budget Officer Finds

June 24, 2022
312
Ben_Kerckx/Pixabay
Petrochemicals & Plastics

Plastics Cited as ‘Fossil Industry’s Plan B’ as Guilbeault Announces Partial Ban

June 24, 2022
193
Erik Whalen/wikimedia commons
Severe Storms & Flooding

Yellowstone Park Reopens, But Flood Recovery Could Take Years, Cost Billions

June 24, 2022
73

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

The federal government's Cliff Street Power Plant is at the centre of Ottawa's plans to reduce natural gas demand. Photo: PWGSC

EXCLUSIVE: Ontario Regulator Refuses New Pipeline, Tells Enbridge to Plan for Lower Gas Demand

May 30, 2022
5.1k
Jason Woodhead/Flickr

Trans Mountain Pipeline On Track to Lose $600 Million, Parliamentary Budget Officer Finds

June 24, 2022
312
Ben_Kerckx/Pixabay

Plastics Cited as ‘Fossil Industry’s Plan B’ as Guilbeault Announces Partial Ban

June 24, 2022
193
Bruce Reeve/Flickr

Opinion: Ontario’s New ‘Carbon Tax’ Looks Like the One Doug Ford Fought

June 7, 2022
1.6k
zephylwer0/pixabay

North American Steel, Aluminium Giants Lumber Toward Green Transition

June 24, 2022
164
Michael and Diane Weidner/Unsplash

Scientists, Politicians Debate Ethics of ‘Climate Tinkering’

June 7, 2022
72

Recent Posts

Erik Whalen/wikimedia commons

Yellowstone Park Reopens, But Flood Recovery Could Take Years, Cost Billions

June 24, 2022
73
TAFE SA TONSLEY/Flickr

Clean Energy Investment to Exceed $1.4T This Year, Still Falls Short of Climate Goals: IEA

June 24, 2022
93
Nemaska Lithium/Facebook

Critical Minerals, Hydrogen Lead Ottawa’s Low-Carbon Industry Strategy

June 24, 2022
79
Cjp24/Wikimedia Commons

UK Green Shift Won’t Repeat Job Destruction of Deindustrialization, Report Finds

June 24, 2022
36
/PxFul

Canadian Farmers Offer Ottawa a Roadmap to Cut Agriculture Emissions

June 24, 2022
92
Pavlofox/Pixabay

Millions Face Famine as Climate Disasters, Ukraine War Slash Food Supplies

June 24, 2022
48
Next Post
jplenio/pixabay

‘Big Blind Spot’ Keeps Climate Impacts Out of Economic Forecasts

The Energy Mix

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}