• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
Wind and Solar Cheaper than Gas Plants in Ontario and Alberta, Study Shows February 7, 2023
AI Predicts World Over 1.5°C Limit by 2030, Undercuts Climate Progress Reports February 7, 2023
February Brings Record Cold, Widespread Power Outages to Much of North America February 7, 2023
Solar Geoengineering Banned in Mexico After ‘Rogue’ Stunt February 7, 2023
Lithium Mine Divides Nemaska Cree Over Impacts, Benefits February 7, 2023
Next
Prev

Democrats Decline Fossil Industry Donations as U.S. Mid-Term Elections Approach

July 3, 2018
Reading time: 4 minutes

Gina Dittmer/PublicDomainPictures

Gina Dittmer/PublicDomainPictures

 

The Democratic National Committee’s (DNC) recent unanimous decision to refuse further campaign donations from Big Oil won’t hurt the party much in upcoming mid-term elections—but may add fuel to the partisan fire that surrounds climate change action in the age of Trump (and the Koch brothers), suggests the latest Greentech Media Political Climate podcast.

The issue is as big as the numbers involved: According to a recent Huffington Post article, “oil and gas companies spent a record US$7.6 million on Democratic races in 2016. But that figure pales in comparison to the $53.7 million in direct donations to Republicans, who received 88% of the industry’s contributions during that election cycle. Republicans have taken in 89% of the industry’s donations so far in 2018.”

  • Concise headlines. Original content. Timely news and views from a select group of opinion leaders. Special extras.
  • Everything you need, nothing you don’t.
  • The Weekender: The climate news you need.
Subscribe

Against that backdrop, RL Miller, political director at the Climate Hawks Vote super-PAC and chair of the California Democratic Party’s environmental caucus, said she saw little risk to the party’s national fundraising in the resolution she co-authored to refuse fossil industry funds. Asked whether the move might “alienate” some voters by signalling a leftward swing in the party, she declared that “climate change is not a party issue: the science tells us the facts.”

On a more pragmatic level, while there might be some issues in “purple” states like Pennsylvania, Colorado, and New Mexico, she added that “most states that are fossil are red”, meaning that they vote consistently Republican.

While Miller and panelists Brandon Hurlbut and Shane Skelton all agreed on the science of climate change, they differed on the action that should result. When a listener asked whether the Koch brothers were the catalyst for Republicans’ resistance to climate action, Hurlbut, a former chief of staff to Obama-era Energy Secretary Steven Chu, chronicled the Kochs’ history of funding climate denial and co-opting elected officials. The “Koch empire may be more powerful than the Republican party,” he warned.

Skelton, a former energy advisor to U.S. House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-WI), agreed that the ongoing campaign of climate misinformation in the U.S. is something “sinister” which has “taken on a life of its own”, but cautioned against a narrative of “malicious” intent. He pointed to the Kochs’ recent record of lobbying against their own financial interests, while defending their ideological ones—most notably in their recent fight against solar tariffs.

Such ideological purity is cold comfort, replied Hurlbut, with a steady flow of misinformation continuing to poison non-partisan efforts for urgent action on climate change.

All the panelists agreed with session moderator Julia Pyper’s observation that, since the 2010 Citizens United decision, there’s just “too much money” in the “toxic” and “broken” American political process.

A case in point for Hurlbut and Miller was the recent decision by 22 Republican members of the Climate Solutions Caucus—a bipartisan group whose objective is to enable genuine action on climate change—to support a GOP amendment that, as reported in the Washington Examiner, sought to bar “any and all funds from being used under the bill to ‘prepare, propose, or promulgate any regulation that relies on the Social Carbon analysis’ devised under the Obama administration on how to value the cost of carbon.”

“This vote shows, once again, that the only endangered species congressional Republicans care about is themselves,” Miller said in the Examiner piece. Skelton responded that the Caucus vote was “childish”—but maintained that the subsequent outcry by Democrats was, too.

The social cost of carbon has “long been political,” he said, and “can be weaponized for cost-benefit analysis.” Hurlbut responded that, “over the last ten years, $65 billion in EPA regulatory costs have been more than recovered in $700 billion in benefits.”

Craig Preston, a conservative California member of the avowedly non-partisan Citizens’ Climate Lobby, told Pyper in a separate interview that he continues to be a strong supporter of the Climate Solutions Caucus, noting that its purpose was “getting people to the table,” to start the conversation in highly partisan times.

“If we’re not at the table, we’re on the menu, and we’re tired of being on the menu,” he said. “We need to make it safe to come to the middle on this issue.”

As the podcast wound down, Hurlbut declared himself a “big fan on the optics”, adding that the DNC resolution on fossil funding would put his party “on the right side of history on this.” When he asked Skelton what forms of climate action Republicans might support, Skelton said he didn’t know. Despite some “really good ideas”, he admitted, “we are going nowhere.”

Which raises an important question for Republicans, he said: “Do you want to live in a world where the Democrats get to codify their preferences? Or are we going to work together to codify something that we can all live with?”



in Climate Denial & Greenwashing, Energy Politics, Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion, Oil & Gas, United States

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

Peoplepoweredbyenergy/Wikimedia Commons
Ending Emissions

Wind and Solar Cheaper than Gas Plants in Ontario and Alberta, Study Shows

February 7, 2023
225
The hottest summer days in a typical New York City year are now about 11 times more frequent than in the 19th century. Image: Andreas Komodromos via Flickr
Carbon Levels & Measurement

AI Predicts World Over 1.5°C Limit by 2030, Undercuts Climate Progress Reports

February 7, 2023
64
Andre Carrotflower/wikimedia commons
Severe Storms & Flooding

February Brings Record Cold, Widespread Power Outages to Much of North America

February 7, 2023
33

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Peoplepoweredbyenergy/Wikimedia Commons

Wind and Solar Cheaper than Gas Plants in Ontario and Alberta, Study Shows

February 7, 2023
225
Beckyq6937/Wikimedia Commons

Solar Geoengineering Banned in Mexico After ‘Rogue’ Stunt

February 7, 2023
105
Michael E. Brunk/flickr

Green Building ‘Heroes’, Climate Contrarian ‘Zombies’, Shell Lawsuits, and ‘Sponge Cities’ to Solve Flooding

February 7, 2023
87
Peter Broster/wikimedia commons

Ottawa Mulls Higher-Speed Trains on Busy Toronto-Quebec City Corridor

February 7, 2023
68
The hottest summer days in a typical New York City year are now about 11 times more frequent than in the 19th century. Image: Andreas Komodromos via Flickr

AI Predicts World Over 1.5°C Limit by 2030, Undercuts Climate Progress Reports

February 7, 2023
64
Brian Robert Marshall/Geograph

Canada’s Solid Renewables Growth Falls Short of Net-Zero Ambitions

February 7, 2023
62

Recent Posts

Andre Carrotflower/wikimedia commons

February Brings Record Cold, Widespread Power Outages to Much of North America

February 7, 2023
33
Nemaska Lithium/Facebook

Lithium Mine Divides Nemaska Cree Over Impacts, Benefits

February 7, 2023
20
Mike Mozart/Flickr

BP Predicts Faster Oil and Gas Decline as Clean Energy Spending Hits $1.1T in 2022

February 4, 2023
357
Gina Dittmer/PublicDomainPictures

Canada Needs Oil and Gas Emissions Cap to Hit 2030 Goal: NZAB

January 31, 2023
212
CONFENIAE

Ecuador’s Amazon Drilling Plan Shows Need for Fossil Non-Proliferation Treaty

January 31, 2023
82
Ken Teegardin www.SeniorLiving.Org/flickr

Virtual Power Plants Hit an ‘Inflection Point’

January 31, 2023
139
Next Post
Steve Jurvetson/Wikimedia Commons

Tesla Hits Long-Promised Target, Produces 5,031 Model 3 Sedans in a Week

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}