• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
Danske Bank Quits New Fossil Fuel Financing January 23, 2023
Extreme Warming Ahead Even as Worst-Case Scenarios Grow ‘Obsolete’ January 23, 2023
Notley Scorches Federal Just Transition Bill as Fossil CEO Calls for Oilsands Boom January 23, 2023
IRON OXIDE: New Battery Brings Long-Duration Storage to Grids, 750 Jobs to West Virginia January 23, 2023
BREAKING: GFANZ Banks, Investors Pour Hundreds of Billions into Fossil Fuels January 17, 2023
Next
Prev

‘Carbon Confusion’ is Bad for Business, Conservative Strategist Warns New Ontario Government

June 7, 2018
Reading time: 2 minutes

Dawn Ellner/flickr

Dawn Ellner/flickr

 

With Doug Ford’s Conservative Party cruising to a majority government in the Ontario election, a former Conservative strategist and chief of staff is warning that the province’s “carbon confusion” is bad for business—and its landmark carbon cap-and-trade plan will be tougher to unravel than Ford might imagine.

“If Ontario ends up with Premier Doug Ford, the province actually gets Premier Patrick Brown, at least when it comes to policies on climate change and carbon pricing,” writes David McLaughlin, a former chief of staff to Prime Minister Brian Mulroney who later went on to lead the National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy, in a June 4 opinion piece for the Globe and Mail.

  • Concise headlines. Original content. Timely news and views from a select group of opinion leaders. Special extras.
  • Everything you need, nothing you don’t.
  • The Weekender: The climate news you need.
New!
Subscribe

“That’s what happens if Mr. Ford wins this week’s election and follows through on his promise to scrap the Liberal government’s cap-and-trade system for reducing carbon emissions. With no equivalent plan by the Progressive Conservative party leader yet—or maybe ever—to tackle climate change, the federal government will be required to step in and impose its ‘backstop’ carbon tax under the Pan-Canadian Framework on Clean Growth and Climate Change.”

Which is precisely what ex-Conservative leader Brown proposed in his platform—except that his plan was to buy in to the national floor price on carbon and hand the proceeds back to Ontarians as a tax cut.

McLaughlin puts some fairly gargantuan numbers behind his contention that it’ll be “costly and complicated” for businesses and taxpayers if Ford follows through on his fulminations about doing away with cap-and-trade.

“Ontario companies have already committed more than C$2.8-billion in emission trading allowances through seven different auctions,” he writes. “Another nine are scheduled to the first compliance period ending December, 2020. These have real value to the approximately 150 large industrial emitters who bought them—until cap-and-trade is gone. Unless the companies can redeem them, that value will disappear.”

And it’s not at all clear that California and Quebec would agree to relinquish the Ontario companies’ trading allowances. “That would lower the price and value of the credits for everyone, causing millions of dollars in losses to individual Ontario companies forced to sell at a discount.” The disruption would also lead to higher emissions, an outcome that “California for sure, and maybe even Quebec” would challenge in court.

Meanwhile, it would be up to Ford to prevent any disadvantage to Ontario companies in the event that he withdrew the province from the cap-and-trade system. Brown had budgeted $1.5 billion against that possibility. Ford, who very late in the election campaign released a “fully costed” program with no fiscal plan, has not.

If Ford is determined to unwind cap-and-trade, McLaughlin has two recommendations: allow a transition period for businesses by taking no action before December 2020, and use that time to “bring in an actual alternative” that will give large industrial emitters an incentive to improve their carbon performance.

“Each of these measures would reduce Ontario’s carbon exposure for business, as well as to taxpayers,” he writes. By contrast, “uploading climate policy to the federal government may make for easy politics, but will be hard on business.”



in Canada, Carbon Levels & Measurement, COP Conferences, Energy Politics, Sub-National Governments

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

RL0919/wikimedia commons
Finance & Investment

Danske Bank Quits New Fossil Fuel Financing

January 23, 2023
2.2k
@tongbingxue/Twitter
Ending Emissions

Extreme Warming Ahead Even as Worst-Case Scenarios Grow ‘Obsolete’

January 23, 2023
290
Rachel Notley/Facebook
Jobs & Training

Notley Scorches Federal Just Transition Bill as Fossil CEO Calls for Oilsands Boom

January 23, 2023
271

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

EcoAnalytics

Albertans Want a Just Transition, Despite Premier’s Grumbling

January 23, 2023
248
United Nations

Salvage of $20B ‘Floating Time Bomb’ Delayed by Rising Cost of Oil Tankers

January 27, 2023
52
RL0919/wikimedia commons

Danske Bank Quits New Fossil Fuel Financing

January 23, 2023
2.2k
@tongbingxue/Twitter

Extreme Warming Ahead Even as Worst-Case Scenarios Grow ‘Obsolete’

January 23, 2023
290
Weirton, WV by Jon Dawson/flickr

IRON OXIDE: New Battery Brings Long-Duration Storage to Grids, 750 Jobs to West Virginia

January 23, 2023
511
Rachel Notley/Facebook

Notley Scorches Federal Just Transition Bill as Fossil CEO Calls for Oilsands Boom

January 23, 2023
271

Recent Posts

Sergio Boscaino/flickr

Dubai Mulls Quitting C40 Cities Over ‘Costly’ Climate Target

January 24, 2023
89
hangela/pixabay

New UK Coal Mine Faces Two Legal Challenges

January 24, 2023
46

Gas Stoves Enter U.S. Climate Culture War, Become ‘Bellwether’ for Industry

January 22, 2023
75
Jeff Hitchcock/flickr.

BREAKING: GFANZ Banks, Investors Pour Hundreds of Billions into Fossil Fuels

January 23, 2023
498

Exxon Had the Right Global Warming Numbers Through Decades of Denial: Study

January 17, 2023
226
willenhallwench / Pixabay

Ontario Greenwashes with ‘Misleading, Illegitimate’ Emission Credits

January 16, 2023
314
Next Post

Humans put conservation reserves at risk

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}