• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
Danske Bank Quits New Fossil Fuel Financing January 23, 2023
Extreme Warming Ahead Even as Worst-Case Scenarios Grow ‘Obsolete’ January 23, 2023
Notley Scorches Federal Just Transition Bill as Fossil CEO Calls for Oilsands Boom January 23, 2023
IRON OXIDE: New Battery Brings Long-Duration Storage to Grids, 750 Jobs to West Virginia January 23, 2023
BREAKING: GFANZ Banks, Investors Pour Hundreds of Billions into Fossil Fuels January 17, 2023
Next
Prev

Two-Thirds of Canadians Oppose Fossil Fuel Subsidies

June 4, 2018
Reading time: 4 minutes

Gina Dittmer/PublicDomainPictures

Gina Dittmer/PublicDomainPictures

 

While the federal government places a respectable third among G7 countries for its approach to phasing out fossil fuel subsidies, it’s still out of step with the large majority of Canadians who don’t want to see their tax dollars used to support oil and gas companies, according to public opinion results released this morning by five national and international environmental organizations.

“The polling data shows Canadians want an end to fossil fuel subsidies in virtually every part of the country and across gender, age, region, education, and income,” states a release from Environmental Defence, Climate Action Network, Équiterre, the International Institute for Sustainable Development, and Oil Change International. The survey by Ekos Research Associates showed “that Canadians want transparency on how much public money is supporting fossil fuel companies; that Canadians understand the environmental and climate benefits of ending these subsidies; and that they are more likely to support political parties that promise to phase them out.”

  • Concise headlines. Original content. Timely news and views from a select group of opinion leaders. Special extras.
  • Everything you need, nothing you don’t.
  • The Weekender: The climate news you need.
New!
Subscribe

The polling was conducted in March, before Finance Minister Bill Morneau announced the country’s latest, greatest fossil subsidy last week—C$4.5 billion to buy out the Kinder Morgan pipeline, amid estimates of $15 to $20 billion to actually finish the project.

Based on the Ekos results, the five organizations report that:

  • Two-thirds of Canadians disagree with oil and gas subsidies, and 41% strongly disagree.
  • The majority still oppose subsidies if they think public money given to fossil companies will create jobs and economic growth. Only three in 10 respondents think an end to fossil subsidies would hurt the economy.
  • Six in 10 Canadians “agree that oil and gas companies should not receive government assistance, on the basis that these subsidies exacerbate pollution and contribute to climate change.”
  • An overwhelming 96% agree that governments should disclose the amount fossils receive in subsidies.
  • 58% “would be more likely to support a political party that promises to eliminate subsidies to oil and gas companies.”
  • The majority of respondents cited the need for more ambitious climate action as the reason to end fossil subsidies, while 21% wanted to see the money freed up for other priorities like health care, education, and housing.

“Canada has a longstanding commitment to phase out fossil fuel subsidies, which have been called ‘the world’s dumbest policy’,” Patrick DeRochie, Climate and Energy Program Manager at Environmental Defence, said in the release. “Now we have data showing that ending these subsidies is overwhelmingly popular. Rather than buying a tar sands pipeline, now is the time to turn words into action and lay out a roadmap to get rid of these handouts to climate polluters.”

“Canadians clearly want an end to subsidies for the fossil fuel industry, as promised by the federal government, but the Kinder Morgan bailout is yet another handout that takes us in the wrong direction,” agreed Alex Doukas, Program Director at Oil Change International.

“The results are crystal clear. Canadians, and in particular Quebecers, do not want their tax dollars financing climate polluters,” said Annie Bérubé, Director of Government Relations at Équiterre. “If Canada is serious about climate action, billions of dollars in handouts to oil and gas companies is contradictory. It’s like telling people to stop smoking, and then giving money to cigarette producers.”

“This week’s G7 is Canada’s time to shine on the international stage,” said Catherine Abreu, Executive Director of Climate Action Network-Canada. “There’s clear public support for ending public subsidies for oil and gas companies. At Charlevoix, we need to see Canada announce its peer review of fossil fuel subsidies and lead its G7 partners in delivering a roadmap to phase out these subsidies by 2025.”

In a separate scorecard released by IISD, Oil Change, the Natural Resources Defense Council, and the Overseas Development Institute, Canada scored third—behind France and Germany, but ahead of the UK, Italy, Japan, and the United States—in its progress on eliminating fossil subsidies. With 54 points out of a possible 100, the country placed first for ending support for coal mining and for fossil fuel-based power, thanks largely to provinces that rely mostly on renewable electricity—but sixth for transparency, and dead last for ending support for oil and gas production.

“Despite Canada’s commitments to phase out fossil fuel subsidies and tackle climate change under the Paris Agreement, the government—like all G7 governments—continues to provide billions in support to oil, gas, and coal, both domestically and internationally, through fiscal support and public financing mechanisms,” the scorecard states.

Across the board, G7 countries delivered at least $100 billion per year to oil gas, and coal in 2015 and 2016, “both at home and abroad and in more than 50 countries around the world,” the scorecard adds. “This included $81 billion in fiscal support through direct spending and tax breaks, and $20 billion in public finance.”



in Energy / Carbon Pricing & Economics

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

EcoAnalytics
Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion

Albertans Want a Just Transition, Despite Premier’s Grumbling

January 23, 2023
188
Climate Denial & Greenwashing

Exxon Had the Right Global Warming Numbers Through Decades of Denial: Study

January 17, 2023
223
Canadian Nuclear Laboratories/flickr
Hydrogen

Hydrogen Patents Reveal Shift Toward Cleaner Technologies

January 16, 2023
89

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

RL0919/wikimedia commons

Danske Bank Quits New Fossil Fuel Financing

January 23, 2023
2.1k
@tongbingxue/Twitter

Extreme Warming Ahead Even as Worst-Case Scenarios Grow ‘Obsolete’

January 23, 2023
267
Rachel Notley/Facebook

Notley Scorches Federal Just Transition Bill as Fossil CEO Calls for Oilsands Boom

January 23, 2023
253
James Vincent Wardhaugh/flickr

Canada Sidelines Ontario’s Ring of Fire, Approves Separate Mining Project

December 4, 2022
379
Weirton, WV by Jon Dawson/flickr

IRON OXIDE: New Battery Brings Long-Duration Storage to Grids, 750 Jobs to West Virginia

January 23, 2023
493
TALL ORDER -- A field of “Freedom” giant miscanthus on Mississippi State University’s South Farm towers over research agronomist Brian Baldwin. Baldwin’s 12-year study of grassy feedstocks indicates the plant is a viable resource for biofuel production. (Photo by MSU Ag Communications/Scott Corey)

Bamboo-like Crop Could Cut U.S. Midwest Warming by 1°C

May 4, 2022
958

Recent Posts

United Nations

Salvage of $20B ‘Floating Time Bomb’ Delayed by Rising Cost of Oil Tankers

January 27, 2023
9
EcoAnalytics

Albertans Want a Just Transition, Despite Premier’s Grumbling

January 23, 2023
188
Sergio Boscaino/flickr

Dubai Mulls Quitting C40 Cities Over ‘Costly’ Climate Target

January 24, 2023
84
hangela/pixabay

New UK Coal Mine Faces Two Legal Challenges

January 24, 2023
43

Gas Stoves Enter U.S. Climate Culture War, Become ‘Bellwether’ for Industry

January 22, 2023
72
Jeff Hitchcock/flickr.

BREAKING: GFANZ Banks, Investors Pour Hundreds of Billions into Fossil Fuels

January 23, 2023
493
Next Post

Thinning clouds increase California’s wildfires

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}