• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
Celebrating our 1,000th edition. The climate news you need
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  FEATURED
Ex-Fossil Workers Convert Old Oilfields to Solar Farms After ‘Rapid Upskilling’ in Alberta June 29, 2022
London Becomes Biggest City to Sign Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty June 29, 2022
G7 Miss ‘Golden Opportunity’, Walk Back Pledge to Cut International Fossil Finance June 29, 2022
Soaring Fertilizer Prices Could Deliver ‘Silver Lining’ For Emissions, But Farmers Struggle to Limit Use June 26, 2022
BREAKING: UN Nature Summit, the ‘Paris Conference for Biodiversity’, Moves to Montreal in December June 19, 2022
Next
Prev
Home Climate & Society Energy / Carbon Pricing & Economics

Two-Thirds of Canadians Oppose Fossil Fuel Subsidies

June 4, 2018
Reading time: 4 minutes

Gina Dittmer/PublicDomainPictures

Gina Dittmer/PublicDomainPictures

 

While the federal government places a respectable third among G7 countries for its approach to phasing out fossil fuel subsidies, it’s still out of step with the large majority of Canadians who don’t want to see their tax dollars used to support oil and gas companies, according to public opinion results released this morning by five national and international environmental organizations.

“The polling data shows Canadians want an end to fossil fuel subsidies in virtually every part of the country and across gender, age, region, education, and income,” states a release from Environmental Defence, Climate Action Network, Équiterre, the International Institute for Sustainable Development, and Oil Change International. The survey by Ekos Research Associates showed “that Canadians want transparency on how much public money is supporting fossil fuel companies; that Canadians understand the environmental and climate benefits of ending these subsidies; and that they are more likely to support political parties that promise to phase them out.”

The polling was conducted in March, before Finance Minister Bill Morneau announced the country’s latest, greatest fossil subsidy last week—C$4.5 billion to buy out the Kinder Morgan pipeline, amid estimates of $15 to $20 billion to actually finish the project.

Based on the Ekos results, the five organizations report that:

  • Two-thirds of Canadians disagree with oil and gas subsidies, and 41% strongly disagree.
  • The majority still oppose subsidies if they think public money given to fossil companies will create jobs and economic growth. Only three in 10 respondents think an end to fossil subsidies would hurt the economy.
  • Six in 10 Canadians “agree that oil and gas companies should not receive government assistance, on the basis that these subsidies exacerbate pollution and contribute to climate change.”
  • An overwhelming 96% agree that governments should disclose the amount fossils receive in subsidies.
  • 58% “would be more likely to support a political party that promises to eliminate subsidies to oil and gas companies.”
  • The majority of respondents cited the need for more ambitious climate action as the reason to end fossil subsidies, while 21% wanted to see the money freed up for other priorities like health care, education, and housing.

“Canada has a longstanding commitment to phase out fossil fuel subsidies, which have been called ‘the world’s dumbest policy’,” Patrick DeRochie, Climate and Energy Program Manager at Environmental Defence, said in the release. “Now we have data showing that ending these subsidies is overwhelmingly popular. Rather than buying a tar sands pipeline, now is the time to turn words into action and lay out a roadmap to get rid of these handouts to climate polluters.”

“Canadians clearly want an end to subsidies for the fossil fuel industry, as promised by the federal government, but the Kinder Morgan bailout is yet another handout that takes us in the wrong direction,” agreed Alex Doukas, Program Director at Oil Change International.

“The results are crystal clear. Canadians, and in particular Quebecers, do not want their tax dollars financing climate polluters,” said Annie Bérubé, Director of Government Relations at Équiterre. “If Canada is serious about climate action, billions of dollars in handouts to oil and gas companies is contradictory. It’s like telling people to stop smoking, and then giving money to cigarette producers.”

“This week’s G7 is Canada’s time to shine on the international stage,” said Catherine Abreu, Executive Director of Climate Action Network-Canada. “There’s clear public support for ending public subsidies for oil and gas companies. At Charlevoix, we need to see Canada announce its peer review of fossil fuel subsidies and lead its G7 partners in delivering a roadmap to phase out these subsidies by 2025.”

In a separate scorecard released by IISD, Oil Change, the Natural Resources Defense Council, and the Overseas Development Institute, Canada scored third—behind France and Germany, but ahead of the UK, Italy, Japan, and the United States—in its progress on eliminating fossil subsidies. With 54 points out of a possible 100, the country placed first for ending support for coal mining and for fossil fuel-based power, thanks largely to provinces that rely mostly on renewable electricity—but sixth for transparency, and dead last for ending support for oil and gas production.

“Despite Canada’s commitments to phase out fossil fuel subsidies and tackle climate change under the Paris Agreement, the government—like all G7 governments—continues to provide billions in support to oil, gas, and coal, both domestically and internationally, through fiscal support and public financing mechanisms,” the scorecard states.

Across the board, G7 countries delivered at least $100 billion per year to oil gas, and coal in 2015 and 2016, “both at home and abroad and in more than 50 countries around the world,” the scorecard adds. “This included $81 billion in fiscal support through direct spending and tax breaks, and $20 billion in public finance.”



in Energy / Carbon Pricing & Economics

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

David/flickr
United States

U.S. Supreme Court Expected to Gut Emission Controls as Climate Scientists Petition for Plan B

June 26, 2022
1.2k
Graco/Facebook
Food Security

Soaring Fertilizer Prices Could Deliver ‘Silver Lining’ for Emissions, But Farmers Struggle to Limit Use

July 2, 2022
212
willenhallwench / Pixabay
Clean Electricity Grid

PG&E Risks Greenwashing with Definition of ‘Scope 4’ Emissions

June 24, 2022
98

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

François GOGLINS/wikimedia commons

Corrosion Problem Shutters Half of France’s Nuclear Reactors

June 29, 2022
227
Keith Hirsche

Ex-Fossil Workers Convert Old Oilfields to Solar Farms After ‘Rapid Upskilling’ in Alberta

June 29, 2022
422
Danielle Scott/flickr

Advocate Urges Ottawa to Intervene Before Ontario Builds Highway 413

June 29, 2022
130
David/flickr

U.S. Supreme Court Expected to Gut Emission Controls as Climate Scientists Petition for Plan B

June 26, 2022
1.2k
Number 10/flickr

G7 Miss ‘Golden Opportunity’, Walk Back Pledge to Cut International Fossil Finance

June 29, 2022
152
London Eye UK England

London Becomes Biggest City to Sign Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty

June 29, 2022
131

Recent Posts

AJEL / Pixabay

Windfall Tax on Food, Fossil, Pharma Giants Would Raise $490B to Solve ‘Catastrophic’ Food Crisis: Oxfam

June 29, 2022
58
futureatlas.com/flickr

Ottawa Demands Deeper Fuel Emissions Cuts, Offers Fossils a Double-Dip on Tax Breaks

June 29, 2022
78
Province of B.C./flickr

Comox Joins Municipalities Seeking Ban on New Gas Stations

June 29, 2022
78
/Piqsels

Refocus Agriculture Spending to Cut Emissions, Boost Productivity, OECD Urges Governments

June 29, 2022
29
Jimmy Emerson, DVM/flickr

Public Vigilance Key to Protecting Greenbelts for Climate Resilience, Report Finds

June 29, 2022
36
Miguel V/Wikimedia Commons

Forests Fall Short of Full Carbon Storage Potential, Study Finds

June 29, 2022
64
Next Post
Low-level clouds over Los Angeles (seen here soon after noon) and other urban areas of coastal southern California are becoming rarer. Image: Courtesy of Park Williams

Thinning clouds increase California’s wildfires

The Energy Mix

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}