• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
Celebrating our 1,000th edition. The climate news you need
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  FEATURED
BREAKING: U.S. Senate Passes Historic $369B Climate Package August 7, 2022
Researchers Point To ‘Dangerously Unexplored’ Risk of Global Climate Catastrophe August 2, 2022
Koch Network Pressures Manchin, Sinema as Advocates Praise ‘Game Changing’ Climate Deal August 2, 2022
Coastal GasLink Cost Skyrockets 70% to $11.2B August 2, 2022
Ottawa Releases Regulatory ‘Frame’ for Net-Zero Grid by 2035 August 2, 2022
Next
Prev

Landmark Low-Carbon Scenario Boosts Efficiency Nearly 50%, Shows Pathway to 1.5°C

May 13, 2018
Reading time: 4 minutes

Brian Robert Marshall/Geograph

Brian Robert Marshall/Geograph

 

A dramatically more energy-efficient global economy can decarbonize electricity and emit no net carbon by 2050, deliver 50% odds of keeping average global warming to 1.5°C, and require “significantly less” negative emissions than other low-carbon models, under a new “backcasting” scenario released late last month by consultants at Ecofys.

The study comes on the heels of a paper in the journal Nature Climate Change that suggested for the first time that the 1.5°C target may be achievable with little or no reliance on a controversial and unproven negative emissions technique, Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS). That increasingly mainstream approach has raised apprehension and controversy across the climate community that will likely reach a crescendo later this year, with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change due to release a special report on 1.5°C pathways ahead of the UN climate conference this December in Katowice, Poland.

Ecofys suggests a broader menu of decarbonization strategies to keep the 1.5°C goal within reach, relying only on less invasive contentious emission options like afforestation and agricultural carbon sequestration to draw down emissions that overshoot the target. Despite brisk population and economic growth, it foresees global primary energy demand declining 8% from 2014 to 2050, to 442 exajoules (EJ, or one quintrillion joules, equivalent to about 275 terawatt-hours), nearly a 50% improvement over the 800-EJ threshold in some mainstream scenarios.

Compared to 2014, when fossils met 78% of global energy demand, the Ecofys model shows wind, biomass, and solar photovoltaics supplying 70% by 2050. In the course of the 36-year transition, carbon dioxide emissions total 680 gigatonnes, toward the top of the 200- to 800-Gt carbon budget available for a 1.5°C outcome.

To get there, Ecosys stresses, there’s no time to waste.

“Fast global action is needed, and the way we live, produce, consume, and dispose of products and services needs to be redesigned, especially if society wants to reduce dependence on future technologies that enable negative emissions,” the report states.

“An energy system transformation as set out here is feasible but highly disruptive. While it is based on technologies that are already available, it will have a high impact on all players in the energy system because of far-reaching electrification and the increased use of bioenergy. Existing businesses will need to be completely reoriented and new business lines developed to cope with the energy technology requirements of the future.”

The scenario assumes a global population of 9.2 billion by 2050 and a tripling of global GDP between 2014 and 2050, with most of the growth taking place in Asia and Africa. Demand for energy services rises “considerably”, with increased demand for seven energy-intensive industrial materials—from chemicals and fertilizers to cement, aluminum, and steel. Almost all transportation modes grow dramatically—aviation by 275%, private cars by 210%, rail by 201%, and trucking by 197%—and more frequent, intense heat waves drive up space cooling demand by a mind-boggling 1,307%.

To meet that demand for energy services with net zero emissions, “efficiency improvements and technology switches are required throughout the whole economy,” the study states. Industrial processes use already available tools and techniques to boost energy efficiency 4% to 50% for different production processes. Buildings reduce heating and cooling demand by 35 to 70%. Transportation energy savings span all modes, with the phaseout of internal combustion engines nearly complete by 2030, freight and bus transport shifted to hydrogen fuel cells and batteries, and rail powered by electricity of biodiesel.

“By 2040 the total demand for liquid fuels in transport is assumed to be met by biofuels to bridge the transition towards electric and hydrogen-powered transport,” the study states. “The application of biofuels before 2050 results in peak demand for biomass, which can and has to be produced sustainably.”

Ecofys draws a sharp contrast between its “disruptive approach” and the collection of more conventional low-carbon scenarios that rely on more exotic, still unproven negative emission technologies.

“The outcomes of integrated assessment models (IAM) demonstrate that least-cost pathways that reach this target would first exceed the carbon budget significantly and subsequently deploy negative emissions on a large scale in the second half of this century,” the study states.

“However, there are several reasons to challenge this proposed trajectory. First, it is questionable whether this is actually the least-cost path,” with solar, wind, and energy storage costs falling fast and development of carbon capture and storage (CCS) behind schedule. The need for rapid decarbonization is also driven by scientists’ concerns about “the effect and undesirable side effects of negative emissions,” along with “a significant risk of temperature overshoot if emissions are not reduced quickly.”

Ultimately, Ecofys writes, “the question can be raised whether it is ethical to shift the responsibility of climate change mitigation (again) to future generations. Nevertheless, utilizing negative emissions is probably unavoidable given the current annual emissions from fossil fuels and cement production of over 35 Gt CO2.”



in Energy / Carbon Pricing & Economics

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

Early stages of construction on the Flamanville 3 nuclear reactor in France
Nuclear

Failing French Nuclear Plants Drive Up Electricity Costs as Heat Waves Cut Production

August 14, 2022
569
Kenueone/Wikimedia Commons
Clean Electricity Grid

Ottawa Releases Regulatory ‘Frame’ for Net-Zero Grid by 2035

August 2, 2022
417
Rewat Wannasuk/Pexels
Clean Electricity Grid

Less Than Half of U.S. Utilities Making Good on Decarbonization Promises: Survey

July 24, 2022
165

Comments 3

  1. Bruce Rosove says:
    4 years ago

    Not clear what the path to this is.

    Reply
    • Mitchell Beer says:
      4 years ago

      It’s basically efficiency first, followed by electrification and decarbonization, with biomass and eventually hydrogen filling any gaps. What’s significant is that they project far lower primary demand in 2050 than most conventional scenarios, and therefore much less carbon overshoot to be drawn down through negative emissions.

      For more detail on any of our stories, you can use the link at the top of the page to click through the original source material.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

François GOGLINS/wikimedia commons

Corrosion Problem Shutters Half of France’s Nuclear Reactors

August 2, 2022
1.6k
Early stages of construction on the Flamanville 3 nuclear reactor in France

Failing French Nuclear Plants Drive Up Electricity Costs as Heat Waves Cut Production

August 8, 2022
569
Protect The Planet

Trans Mountain Work Site Blocks Early Salmon Run on Coquihalla River, Local Observers Say

August 11, 2022
409
Bernard Spragg/flickr

$12.3B in Profit over 3 Months as Big Fossils Reject Federal Emissions Cap

August 11, 2022
270
Σ64/Wikimedia Commons

Global Push for Hydrogen Sidesteps Knowledge Gaps on Climate Impacts

August 11, 2022
316
Muramasa/Wikimedia Commons

Newfoundland Wind Farm Would Power Coastal Green Hydrogen Plant

July 17, 2022
694

Recent Posts

Focus Blame for Climate Change on Fossils and Governments, Ecoanalytics Advises

August 11, 2022
129
TheKurgan/Wikipedia

Ontario Pension Giant May Be Getting the Memo on Fossil Divestment, Members Say

August 11, 2022
102
@stan_sdcollins/Twitter

Stranded Communities Hope for Emergency Food Supplies as Newfoundland Wildfires Rage

August 11, 2022
53
Maurizio Pesce/Wikimedia Commons

Tesla Lobbying Points to Ontario as Possible EV Manufacturing Site

August 11, 2022
42
MENA/Flickr

Ontario Gains from U.S. EV Tax Credit, But Plans No Incentives for Local Drivers

August 11, 2022
39
Twitter

Shelling of Ukraine’s Zaporizhzhia Plant Raises Fears for Nuclear Safety

August 11, 2022
39
Next Post
Ancient logjam in the Petrified Forest National Park. Image: By US National Park Service

Planetary climate influence has age-old effect

The Energy Mix

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}