• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
Celebrating our 1,000th edition. The climate news you need
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  FEATURED
EXCLUSIVE: Hydrogen is Up, Pieridae is Out as German Chancellor Preps for Canada Visit August 15, 2022
Historic Climate Bill Passes U.S. House, Goes to Biden for Signature August 15, 2022
BREAKING: U.S. Senate Passes Historic $369B Climate Package August 7, 2022
Researchers Point To ‘Dangerously Unexplored’ Risk of Global Climate Catastrophe August 2, 2022
Koch Network Pressures Manchin, Sinema as Advocates Praise ‘Game Changing’ Climate Deal August 2, 2022
Next
Prev

Automakers ‘Walk a Tightrope’ as Trump Rolls Back Tailpipe Emission Rules

May 11, 2018
Reading time: 3 minutes

MENA/Flickr

MENA/Flickr

 

After initially lobbying the Trump administration to water down Obama-era fuel efficiency and tailpipe emission standards, U.S. automakers now find themselves “walking a tightrope” between a White House that expects their support for a more aggressive rollback, and the prospect that the federal move will split the North American auto market in two.

At a White House meeting that was to take place today, Donald Trump was expected to “deliver a pointed message” that manufacturers should get onboard with the administration plan, the New York Times reports. At an advance preparatory session for the meeting, “White House officials, including Chris Liddell, the deputy chief of staff, made it known…that Mr. Trump was unhappy that automakers had not rallied around the proposed rollbacks,” the paper adds, citing one industry participant.

But in recent House of Representatives testimony, top auto industry Mitch Bainwol took a more measured tone, urging the administration “to find a solution that continues to increase fuel efficiency standards,” setting the stage for some awkward moments when the meeting takes place.

“On one hand, they are eager to stay in the good graces of a president who not only is intent on moving forward his deregulatory agenda, but who is also capable, if so inclined, of hurling insults at automakers on Twitter or pushing for damaging tariffs,” the Times notes. “At the same time, automakers are eager to find a way to work with California, which is intent on sticking with the Obama-era rules and has threatened to sue if the federal government gets in the way.”

But that’s not the way a key administration advisor sees it.

“He has seen them on his side, and now there is disagreement about how far this should go,” said Myron Ebell, the climate denier who led the Trump transition team for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Ebell’s interpretation is that “the automakers have succumbed to Stockholm syndrome” in their position on tailpipe standards, he told the Times. “They now identify with their kidnappers, and need therapy to recover.”

The Times report points to a different kind of shock therapy that may soon be aimed in the White House’s direction.

“Automakers worry that a drastic rollback of fuel efficiency regulations will alienate the state of California, which has the unique authority under the Clean Air Act to set its own air pollution rules,” the paper notes. “The state’s threat to stick with the Obama rules or to sue the federal government raises the spectre of a messy court battle during which the American auto market could be split along two competing sets of fuel-economy standards, something the auto industry would like to avoid.”

But a draft regulatory plan now under development by EPA and the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) seems set to inflame the situation. Judging by a leaked draft, the proposal “wouldn’t outright revoke the state’s ability to set pollution standards, but it asserts that a 1975 law prohibits states from setting their own limits on greenhouse gas emissions,” Bloomberg reports.

“According to a summary of the plan released by Senator Tom Carper of Delaware, the agencies’ draft proposal recommends freezing the standards from model year 2020 through 2026, setting fuel economy requirements at a 37 mile per gallon fleet average in those years instead of rising each year.”

The same approach has been rejected by U.S. federal courts, not once, but twice. Legal observers contacted by Bloomberg disagreed on how serious a problem that poses for the administration.

“It strikes me as an extraordinarily weak legal argument,” said UCLA law professor Ann Carlson.

“I think it really is very much an open question,” countered Jeff Holmstead, a former assistant EPA administrator during the Bush administration.

Much of the discussion centres on the 2009 waiver that gave California the right to set its own fuel efficiency standards, put an end to “heated litigation” on the topic, and gave the industry a single national standard to adhere to, Bloomberg notes. “Since 2010, it’s been clear that all of these standards can live together harmoniously,” said Jody Freeman, a Harvard environmental law professor who helped negotiate the original deal. “So now it’s somewhat ironic to say ‘Well, there’s this terrible conflict and because of all this conflict we have to preempt them.’ On its face, it’s flying against all the evidence so far.”

In the light, she said, the pre-emption plan in the EPA-NHTSA draft “looks like an effort to do an end-run around the waiver.”



in Auto & Alternative Vehicles, Energy Politics, Health & Safety, Legal & Regulatory, United States

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

Ken Hodge/Flickr
Oil & Gas

No Path for Canadian LNG Exports to Europe, IISD Analysis Concludes

August 18, 2022
3
kris krüg/flickr
Tar Sands / Oil Sands

Guilbeault Considering Alternatives to Releasing Toxic Tailings into Athabasca River

August 18, 2022
2
Ford F-150 LIghtning
Clean Electricity Grid

U.S. Utility Plans to Draw Power from Ford Electric Pickups

August 18, 2022
2

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Brocken Inaglory/wikimedia commons

State-Wide Megastorm Driven by Global Heating Could Drench California for a Month

August 15, 2022
1.1k
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Coal_Carbon_Capture_Technology_In_Use.png

Carbon Capture a ‘Dangerous Distraction’, 500 Organizations Warn Canada, U.S.

July 23, 2021
617
TGEGASENGINEERING/Wikimedia Commons

EXCLUSIVE: Hydrogen is Up, Pieridae is Out as German Chancellor Preps for Canada Visit

August 15, 2022
1.1k
Vinaykumar8687/WikimediaCommons

Solar On Track for ‘Staggering’ 30% Growth This Year

August 15, 2022
315
Early stages of construction on the Flamanville 3 nuclear reactor in France

Failing French Nuclear Plants Drive Up Electricity Costs as Heat Waves Cut Production

August 14, 2022
753
rawpixel

Common Medications Foil Body’s Ability to Cope with Hot Weather

August 15, 2022
205

Recent Posts

Suncor Energy Plant_Max and Dee Bernt:Flickr

Fossils Would ‘Bust the Paris Agreement’ with Inadequate Decarbonization Plans

August 18, 2022
2
Ken Hodge/Flickr

No Path for Canadian LNG Exports to Europe, IISD Analysis Concludes

August 18, 2022
3
Steve Jurvetson/flickr

The Other Kind of Climate Change: Even a ‘Limited’ Nuclear War Would Trigger Starvation, Kill Billions

August 18, 2022
75
kris krüg/flickr

Guilbeault Considering Alternatives to Releasing Toxic Tailings into Athabasca River

August 18, 2022
2
Ford F-150 LIghtning

U.S. Utility Plans to Draw Power from Ford Electric Pickups

August 18, 2022
2
power pylons sunrise grid

Midwestern U.S. Grid Investment Supports Massive Increase in Renewables

August 18, 2022
3
Next Post
Alberta Legislature, Timorose/Wikimedia Commons

Government Fossil Royalties Plummet Despite Increased Production

The Energy Mix

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}