• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
SPECIAL REPORT: ‘Defuse the Climate Time Bomb’ with Net-Zero by 2040, Guterres Urges G20 March 20, 2023
Devastating Impacts, Affordable Climate Solutions Drive IPCC’s Urgent Call for Action March 20, 2023
Window for 1.5°C ‘Rapidly Closing’, IPCC Warns March 20, 2023
Swift Action, Inclusive Resilience Vital in Face of Overlapping Climate Hazards March 20, 2023
Shift from Fossils to Renewables is Quickest, Cheapest Path to Cut Emissions, IPCC Report Shows March 20, 2023
Next
Prev

Automakers ‘Walk a Tightrope’ as Trump Rolls Back Tailpipe Emission Rules

May 11, 2018
Reading time: 3 minutes

MENA/Flickr

MENA/Flickr

 

After initially lobbying the Trump administration to water down Obama-era fuel efficiency and tailpipe emission standards, U.S. automakers now find themselves “walking a tightrope” between a White House that expects their support for a more aggressive rollback, and the prospect that the federal move will split the North American auto market in two.

At a White House meeting that was to take place today, Donald Trump was expected to “deliver a pointed message” that manufacturers should get onboard with the administration plan, the New York Times reports. At an advance preparatory session for the meeting, “White House officials, including Chris Liddell, the deputy chief of staff, made it known…that Mr. Trump was unhappy that automakers had not rallied around the proposed rollbacks,” the paper adds, citing one industry participant.

  • Be among the first to read The Energy Mix Weekender
  • A brand new weekly digest containing exclusive and essential climate stories from around the world.
  • The Weekender:The climate news you need.
Subscribe

But in recent House of Representatives testimony, top auto industry Mitch Bainwol took a more measured tone, urging the administration “to find a solution that continues to increase fuel efficiency standards,” setting the stage for some awkward moments when the meeting takes place.

“On one hand, they are eager to stay in the good graces of a president who not only is intent on moving forward his deregulatory agenda, but who is also capable, if so inclined, of hurling insults at automakers on Twitter or pushing for damaging tariffs,” the Times notes. “At the same time, automakers are eager to find a way to work with California, which is intent on sticking with the Obama-era rules and has threatened to sue if the federal government gets in the way.”

But that’s not the way a key administration advisor sees it.

“He has seen them on his side, and now there is disagreement about how far this should go,” said Myron Ebell, the climate denier who led the Trump transition team for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Ebell’s interpretation is that “the automakers have succumbed to Stockholm syndrome” in their position on tailpipe standards, he told the Times. “They now identify with their kidnappers, and need therapy to recover.”

The Times report points to a different kind of shock therapy that may soon be aimed in the White House’s direction.

“Automakers worry that a drastic rollback of fuel efficiency regulations will alienate the state of California, which has the unique authority under the Clean Air Act to set its own air pollution rules,” the paper notes. “The state’s threat to stick with the Obama rules or to sue the federal government raises the spectre of a messy court battle during which the American auto market could be split along two competing sets of fuel-economy standards, something the auto industry would like to avoid.”

But a draft regulatory plan now under development by EPA and the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) seems set to inflame the situation. Judging by a leaked draft, the proposal “wouldn’t outright revoke the state’s ability to set pollution standards, but it asserts that a 1975 law prohibits states from setting their own limits on greenhouse gas emissions,” Bloomberg reports.

“According to a summary of the plan released by Senator Tom Carper of Delaware, the agencies’ draft proposal recommends freezing the standards from model year 2020 through 2026, setting fuel economy requirements at a 37 mile per gallon fleet average in those years instead of rising each year.”

The same approach has been rejected by U.S. federal courts, not once, but twice. Legal observers contacted by Bloomberg disagreed on how serious a problem that poses for the administration.

“It strikes me as an extraordinarily weak legal argument,” said UCLA law professor Ann Carlson.

“I think it really is very much an open question,” countered Jeff Holmstead, a former assistant EPA administrator during the Bush administration.

Much of the discussion centres on the 2009 waiver that gave California the right to set its own fuel efficiency standards, put an end to “heated litigation” on the topic, and gave the industry a single national standard to adhere to, Bloomberg notes. “Since 2010, it’s been clear that all of these standards can live together harmoniously,” said Jody Freeman, a Harvard environmental law professor who helped negotiate the original deal. “So now it’s somewhat ironic to say ‘Well, there’s this terrible conflict and because of all this conflict we have to preempt them.’ On its face, it’s flying against all the evidence so far.”

In the light, she said, the pre-emption plan in the EPA-NHTSA draft “looks like an effort to do an end-run around the waiver.”



in Auto & Alternative Vehicles, Energy Politics, Health & Safety, Legal & Regulatory, United States

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

IFRC Intl. Federation:Twitter
International Agencies & Studies

Devastating Impacts, Affordable Climate Solutions Drive IPCC’s Urgent Call for Action

March 21, 2023
714
U.S. National Park Service/rawpixel
International Agencies & Studies

Window for 1.5°C ‘Rapidly Closing’, IPCC Warns

March 20, 2023
59
FMSC/Flickr
Environmental Justice

Swift Action, Inclusive Resilience Vital in Face of Overlapping Climate Hazards

March 20, 2023
52

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

U.S. Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement/flickr

Willow Oil Project in Alaska Faces Legal Challenges, Economic Doubts

March 19, 2023
420
Kern River Valley Fire Info/Facebook

SPECIAL REPORT: ‘Defuse the Climate Time Bomb’ with Net-Zero by 2040, Guterres Urges G20

March 20, 2023
180
IFRC Intl. Federation:Twitter

Devastating Impacts, Affordable Climate Solutions Drive IPCC’s Urgent Call for Action

March 21, 2023
714
Kenuoene/pixabay

Shift from Fossils to Renewables is Quickest, Cheapest Path to Cut Emissions, IPCC Report Shows

March 20, 2023
118
Secretariat of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine/Wikimedia Commons

IPCC Report Charts a Course for Ottawa’s ‘Clean Technology’ Budget

March 21, 2023
102
U.S. National Park Service/rawpixel

Window for 1.5°C ‘Rapidly Closing’, IPCC Warns

March 20, 2023
59

Recent Posts

FMSC/Flickr

Swift Action, Inclusive Resilience Vital in Face of Overlapping Climate Hazards

March 20, 2023
52
Kiara Worth, UNClimateChange/flickr

Gap Between IPCC’s Science, National Actions Sets Challenge for COP 28

March 21, 2023
51
Photo by IISD/ENB

IPCC Sees Deeper Risk in Overshooting 1.5°C Warming Threshold

March 20, 2023
35
EcoFlight

Historic Deal Reopens B.C. Indigenous Territory to Fracking, Promises Land Restoration

March 19, 2023
434
Wikimedia Commons/Humans of Vanuatu

Six Countries Call for Fossil-Free Pacific

March 19, 2023
42
Wikipedia

Fossil Funding Makes Indigenous Resource Network a ‘Propaganda Machine’, Opponent Says

March 19, 2023
75
Next Post
Alberta Legislature, Timorose/Wikimedia Commons

Government Fossil Royalties Plummet Despite Increased Production

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}