• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
Danske Bank Quits New Fossil Fuel Financing January 23, 2023
Extreme Warming Ahead Even as Worst-Case Scenarios Grow ‘Obsolete’ January 23, 2023
Notley Scorches Federal Just Transition Bill as Fossil CEO Calls for Oilsands Boom January 23, 2023
IRON OXIDE: New Battery Brings Long-Duration Storage to Grids, 750 Jobs to West Virginia January 23, 2023
BREAKING: GFANZ Banks, Investors Pour Hundreds of Billions into Fossil Fuels January 17, 2023
Next
Prev

NEB Rebuffs Kinder Morgan Bid to Put Pipeline Spill Risk on ‘Corporate Credit Card’

May 2, 2018
Reading time: 3 minutes

Enron Complex: Alex/wikimedia commons

Enron Complex: Alex/wikimedia commons

 

Canada’s National Energy Board (NEB) is forcing Kinder Morgan Canada to maintain a C$500-million standing loan with its Houston-based parent company to cover the short-term costs of containing and cleaning up a future oil spill, throwing a wrench in the U.S. company’s determined efforts to avoid any financial responsibility for the project.

The parent company, Kinder Morgan Inc., “had been working for years to build a financial firewall around its Canadian subsidiary and the risky and controversial Trans Mountain pipeline, pledging to investors that it would not use its own capital to build the pipeline,” Sightline Institute Energy Finance Director Clark Williams-Derry explains in a blog post this week. In its 2017 annual report, Kinder Morgan Inc. said it expected Kinder Morgan Canada “to be a self-funding entity and does not anticipate making contributions to fund its growth” or cover the cost of the pipeline.

  • Concise headlines. Original content. Timely news and views from a select group of opinion leaders. Special extras.
  • Everything you need, nothing you don’t.
  • The Weekender: The climate news you need.
New!
Subscribe

In other words—the parent company was trying to give its investors all the benefits of a pipeline project with predictable, locked-in profit, with none of the environmental or economic risks.

The NEB set the requirement for the $500-million line of credit in early 2017, Williams-Derry writes. “Kinder Morgan had petitioned to replace this cash guarantee with a “credit facility”—akin to a corporate credit card—that it had arranged with a consortium of Canadian banks. If the NEB had agreed to this request, the pipeline’s corporate parent would no longer have to keep a half-billion dollars of ready cash on hand to deal with spills.”

The Board denied that request, just days after Kinder Morgan’s April 8 ultimatum to the federal, Alberta, and B.C. governments to give it the “clarity” it needs to carry on with the project.

“The NEB ruled that Kinder Morgan’s effort to shift responsibility for cleanup off their books simply did not meet the Board’s legal requirements,” Williams-Derry states. “Because the board deemed the proposed credit facility inadequate, it ordered the company to keep its original line of credit in place—meaning that Kinder Morgan, Inc. must continue to keep at least a half a billion dollars available to be spent on a moment’s notice to deal with a Trans Mountain oil spill. For Kinder Morgan, this move has a deep—and disturbing—financial impact,” either saddling the company with extra debt or tying up money it would want to use for just about any other purpose.

A key concern for the parent company is a provision in the 2016 Pipeline Safety Act that a company accept unlimited liability for a major oil spill in which it’s deemed at fault or negligent. “Under this law, a major oil spill could trigger a financial crisis for Kinder Morgan, Inc.,” Williams-Derry writes.

“To guard against this, the company has attempted to use subsidiaries and shell corporations to wall off the Trans Mountain project, and its Canadian subsidiary as a whole, from the rest of the company’s assets. But the NEB’s requirement that the parent company keep a half-billion in cash on hand may signal the potential for Kinder Morgan, Inc. to remain on the hook for full cleanup costs—raising serious concerns for the parent firm’s finances in the event of a catastrophic spill.”

For a company with its own “tarnished” safety record, he adds, the requirement “may prove to be one of the deciding factors that sours Kinder Morgan on the long-term prospects for the pipeline.”



in Canada, Community Climate Finance, Health & Safety, Legal & Regulatory, Pipelines / Rail Transport, Tar Sands / Oil Sands, Water

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

United Nations
Air & Marine

Salvage of $20B ‘Floating Time Bomb’ Delayed by Rising Cost of Oil Tankers

January 27, 2023
83
RL0919/wikimedia commons
Finance & Investment

Danske Bank Quits New Fossil Fuel Financing

January 23, 2023
2.2k
@tongbingxue/Twitter
Ending Emissions

Extreme Warming Ahead Even as Worst-Case Scenarios Grow ‘Obsolete’

January 23, 2023
307

Comments 6

  1. Judy Lewis says:
    5 years ago

    Glad to learn that the NEB is protective of Canada! But what if Kinder Morgan is not be able to pay for clean-ups even with this new provision? And what if the damage done is irreparable?

    Reply
  2. Alain says:
    5 years ago

    They need more like 100 billions if s*it hit the fan….

    Reply
  3. Robert dingle says:
    5 years ago

    Ask KM to pony up and they bail! Sure Canada takes on all the liability& KM takes all the profit south! Nationalize their existing pipe & kick them out of Canada!

    Reply
  4. Lars Friis says:
    5 years ago

    With the extreme Pro-Oil & Corporate bias of nearly everything coming out of Ottawa (since forever), I trust neither our own governments, nor their agencies(NEB), nor ESPECIALLY any part of K-M with regard to this proposed pipeline. The idiocy of proposing to make the Port of Vancouver an international Oil Port (1.1 ships/day for K-M alone) is so far beyond LUDICROUS, that words fail me, as does the stupidity of any government that would consider IT.

    Reply
  5. Ann Parker says:
    5 years ago

    Exxon Valdez oil spill (1989) clean-up costs exceeded $7 billion (according to the International Tanker Owners Pollution Federation Limited) and despite application of the most advanced technology available, only approximately 8% of the oil was recovered. There is still over 100 tonnes of oil remaining in the area.
    To date the spill caused more than $300 million of economic harm to more than 32,000 people whose livelihoods depended on commercial and recreational fishing and tourism. Two years following the spill, the economic losses to recreational fishing were estimated to be $31 million.
    25 years after the spill Exxon is still fighting the claims.
    The death toll of wildlife is estimated at hundreds of thousands seabirds, sea and river otters, harbor seals, and bald eagles; population of killer whales that swam through the affected parts of the Prince William Sound suffered losses of 40 percent in the year after this disaster (22 Orcas died immediately after the spill), plus billions of salmon and herring eggs were destroyed according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).

    Reply
  6. Lionel A Lewis says:
    5 years ago

    Dilbit (diluted bitumen) is impossible to clean up. The dilutent is a carcinogenic liquid which will leach out into sea water leaving the bitumen (cheap and dirty) to fall to the seabed. The Exxon Valdez spill happened in 1989 and has still not been cleaned up and probably never will be; and that was with a higher quality oil.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

RL0919/wikimedia commons

Danske Bank Quits New Fossil Fuel Financing

January 23, 2023
2.2k
EcoAnalytics

Albertans Want a Just Transition, Despite Premier’s Grumbling

January 23, 2023
274
United Nations

Salvage of $20B ‘Floating Time Bomb’ Delayed by Rising Cost of Oil Tankers

January 27, 2023
83
@tongbingxue/Twitter

Extreme Warming Ahead Even as Worst-Case Scenarios Grow ‘Obsolete’

January 23, 2023
307
Weirton, WV by Jon Dawson/flickr

IRON OXIDE: New Battery Brings Long-Duration Storage to Grids, 750 Jobs to West Virginia

January 23, 2023
527
KHOU 11/YouTube

Texas Export Terminal Admits Human Error in LNG Explosion, Fire

August 21, 2022
3.1k

Recent Posts

Rachel Notley/Facebook

Notley Scorches Federal Just Transition Bill as Fossil CEO Calls for Oilsands Boom

January 23, 2023
285
Sergio Boscaino/flickr

Dubai Mulls Quitting C40 Cities Over ‘Costly’ Climate Target

January 24, 2023
94
hangela/pixabay

New UK Coal Mine Faces Two Legal Challenges

January 24, 2023
47

Gas Stoves Enter U.S. Climate Culture War, Become ‘Bellwether’ for Industry

January 22, 2023
79
Jeff Hitchcock/flickr.

BREAKING: GFANZ Banks, Investors Pour Hundreds of Billions into Fossil Fuels

January 23, 2023
505

Exxon Had the Right Global Warming Numbers Through Decades of Denial: Study

January 17, 2023
227
Next Post

North Sea clean-up costs ‘likely to double’

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}