• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
Danske Bank Quits New Fossil Fuel Financing January 23, 2023
Extreme Warming Ahead Even as Worst-Case Scenarios Grow ‘Obsolete’ January 23, 2023
Notley Scorches Federal Just Transition Bill as Fossil CEO Calls for Oilsands Boom January 23, 2023
IRON OXIDE: New Battery Brings Long-Duration Storage to Grids, 750 Jobs to West Virginia January 23, 2023
BREAKING: GFANZ Banks, Investors Pour Hundreds of Billions into Fossil Fuels January 17, 2023
Next
Prev

LNG Canada Awards $14-Billion Design-Build Contract for Kitimat Plant

May 2, 2018
Reading time: 3 minutes

Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons

 

The LNG Canada consortium has awarded a contract, reported to be worth C$14 billion, to design and build a liquefied natural gas plant at Kitimat, British Columbia, even though the project is still subject to government approval and a final investment decision by consortium partners.

“That decision is expected this year,” JWN Energy reports. “However, LNG Canada and other LNG developers are still waiting to hear if the federal government will exempt LNG modules from a 45% duty on fabricated steel products imported from China, South Korea, and Spain.”

  • The climate news you need. Subscribe now to our engaging new weekly digest.
  • You’ll receive exclusive, never-before-seen-content, distilled and delivered to your inbox every weekend.
  • The Weekender: Succinct, solutions-focused, and designed with the discerning reader in mind.
New!
Subscribe

The design-build contract will go to Japan’s JGC Corporation and U.S.-based Fluor Corporation.

LNG Canada stirred controversy in March when the B.C. government unveiled tax incentives to support the project, valued at $40 billion. At the time, Horgan maintained the development would be consistent with his government’s promise to reduce B.C.’s greenhouse gas emissions 40% by 2030—a commitment that is a cornerstone of the New Democrats’ governing agreement with the Green Party of B.C. In a release, Horgan’s office said the project would be the biggest private sector investment in B.C. history, producing up to 10,000 jobs during construction and up to 950 permanent positions.

“No premier or government can dismiss this kind of critical economic opportunity for the people of British Columbia,” the premier said. “But neither will we turn our back on our commitment to climate targets, or our path to reconciliation with Indigenous peoples.”

Weeks before Horgan’s announcement, the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers secured the province’s assurance that its upcoming scientific inquiry into the natural gas fracking industry would not cover emissions or public health risk, according to documents obtained by DeSmog Canada.

In January, provincial Green Leader Andrew Weaver said Horgan’s trip to Asia to woo project investors could undo the two parties’ governing agreement in a split provincial legislature.

“Lest there be any doubt, let me be perfectly clear: NDP government will fall in non-confidence if after all that has happened it continues to pursue LNG folly,” Weaver tweeted at the time. “The reason why we agreed to the [governing] agreement with the NDP is their supposed commitment to GHG reduction,” he added in a separate tweet. “A push for #LNG means they are not serious. We are willing to let BC voters have their say. We would have been deceived.”

In a release last week, LNG Canada spokesperson Susannah Pierce said the timing of the final investment decision “is up to the joint venture participants to make, and they will weigh their decision against a number of criteria, including project competitiveness, how the LNG Canada project fits within their existing portfolio of projects and investments, and available capital, amongst others.”

The four members of the consortium are Royal Dutch Shell, PetroChina, Kogas, and Mitsubishi Corporation.



in Canada, Community Climate Finance, Oil & Gas, Shale & Fracking, Sub-National Governments

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

RL0919/wikimedia commons
Finance & Investment

Danske Bank Quits New Fossil Fuel Financing

January 23, 2023
1.9k
Rachel Notley/Facebook
Jobs & Training

Notley Scorches Federal Just Transition Bill as Fossil CEO Calls for Oilsands Boom

January 23, 2023
222
EcoAnalytics
Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion

Albertans Want a Just Transition, Despite Premier’s Grumbling

January 23, 2023
168

Comments 1

  1. René Ebacher says:
    5 years ago

    It seems that B.C. has lost its leadership in reducing GHG emissions and fighting climate change.
    The latest figures for the year 2015 show that B.C.’s greenhouse emissions continue to grow. GHG emissions reached 63.3 million tonnes (Mt) carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2 eq), a 1.6% increase over the previous year. It seems also that the B.C. government is not reporting adequately some emissions.
    A scientific study done in 2017 by the David Suzuki Foundation in collaboration with researchers from the St.Francis Xavier University has estimated that methane emissions from the oil and gas industry in B.C. is 2.5 times higher than provincial estimates. It has estimated that in the northwestern B.C.’s Montney Basin alone, more than 118,000 tonnes of methane are released annually into the atmosphere. B.C. is not a special case in that matter, fugitive emissions from oil and gas wells in North America have also been under reported.
    (source: Globe and Mail, April 28, 2017: “Methane pollution from B.C.’s oil, gas industry higher than provincial estimates”)
    Following the federal government, B.C. has also stop reporting GHG emissions from forest fires, as over the years, forests in Canada have become a major “source” of carbon instead of a “sink”.
    In 2015, emissions from forest fires in B.C. were estimated at 48.7 Mt CO2 eq , greater than forest growth (minus decay) of 28.4 Mt. There was no figure for slash burning.
    Emissions from wildfires in 2017 would likely be much greater, as more than 1.2 million hectares of forest burned, more than four times the 300,000 hectares that burned in 2015.
    (source: Vancouver Sun, Jan. 12, 2018: “Latest figures show B.C.’s carbon emissions continue to increase”)

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

RL0919/wikimedia commons

Danske Bank Quits New Fossil Fuel Financing

January 23, 2023
1.9k
Weirton, WV by Jon Dawson/flickr

IRON OXIDE: New Battery Brings Long-Duration Storage to Grids, 750 Jobs to West Virginia

January 23, 2023
445
Kenuoene/pixabay

$50B Opportunity Means ‘Go Time’ for Canadian Renewables: CanREA CEO

December 19, 2022
541
EcoAnalytics

Albertans Want a Just Transition, Despite Premier’s Grumbling

January 23, 2023
168
Rachel Notley/Facebook

Notley Scorches Federal Just Transition Bill as Fossil CEO Calls for Oilsands Boom

January 23, 2023
222
@tongbingxue/Twitter

Extreme Warming Ahead Even as Worst-Case Scenarios Grow ‘Obsolete’

January 23, 2023
228

Recent Posts

Sergio Boscaino/flickr

Dubai Mulls Quitting C40 Cities Over ‘Costly’ Climate Target

January 24, 2023
75
hangela/pixabay

New UK Coal Mine Faces Two Legal Challenges

January 24, 2023
38

Gas Stoves Enter U.S. Climate Culture War, Become ‘Bellwether’ for Industry

January 22, 2023
69
Jeff Hitchcock/flickr.

BREAKING: GFANZ Banks, Investors Pour Hundreds of Billions into Fossil Fuels

January 23, 2023
486

Exxon Had the Right Global Warming Numbers Through Decades of Denial: Study

January 17, 2023
221
willenhallwench / Pixabay

Ontario Greenwashes with ‘Misleading, Illegitimate’ Emission Credits

January 16, 2023
305
Next Post
WhisperToMe/Wikipedia

Kinder Morgan Siphons Billions in Subsidies, Canadian Investment Dollars

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}