• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
BP Predicts Faster Oil and Gas Decline as Clean Energy Spending Hits $1.1T in 2022 January 31, 2023
Canada Needs Oil and Gas Emissions Cap to Hit 2030 Goal: NZAB January 31, 2023
Ecuador’s Amazon Drilling Plan Shows Need for Fossil Non-Proliferation Treaty January 31, 2023
Rainforest Carbon Credits from World’s Biggest Provider are ‘Largely Worthless’, Investigation Finds January 31, 2023
Danske Bank Quits New Fossil Fuel Financing January 23, 2023
Next
Prev

Canada Stands Firm, Earns Applause with Tough Methane Rules for Oil and Gas

April 27, 2018
Reading time: 3 minutes

Zubro/Wikimedia Commons

Zubro/Wikimedia Commons

 

The Canadian government is earning applause from major environmental groups, but may be on the road to a conflict with Alberta, after unveiling its final regulations to control methane emissions from the country’s oil and gas sector.

The federal rules, released Wednesday, “would require oil companies to inspect virtually all their field equipment for methane leaks three times a year, repair all leaks, and dramatically reduce their ability to vent the gas into the atmosphere,” the Globe and Mail reports. A day earlier, Alberta unveiled regulations that “would require annual inspections and would allow companies to manage their emissions by focusing on the most likely problem areas, and would set easier standards for venting.”

  • Concise headlines. Original content. Timely news and views from a select group of opinion leaders. Special extras.
  • Everything you need, nothing you don’t.
  • The Weekender: The climate news you need.
New!
Subscribe

Methane specialists at the U.S. Environmental Defense Fund said the regulation would save 232 megatonnes of emissions and $11.6 billion in forecast environmental impacts, iPolitics reports.

Federal officials say their regulations will supersede Alberta’s unless the province shows it can achieve the same emission reductions, and Alberta Energy Minister Margaret McCuaig Boyd is making precisely that pitch. “We’re confident our efforts will achieve equivalency with the federal government’s requirements, but with lower cost and more flexibility for industry,” said spokesperson Michael McKinnon.

But Drew Nelson, a methane specialist from the U.S. Environmental Defense Fund, said that’s unlikely.

“Alberta’s proposal is not credible and is nowhere close to equivalent to federal regulations, because there is no way to confirm operators’ claims of compliance with site-level regulations,” Nelson told the Globe. “Alberta’s regulatory proposal is like a get-out-of-jail card for industry. Federal action will be undermined if they give this false equivalency.”

EDF President Fred Krupp called the federal regulations “a sign of international climate leadership and further evidence that global momentum is building to reduce this powerful pollutant.” While “methane emissions are an urgent climate problem,” he added, “there are many low-cost, simple fixes that can deliver meaningful and immediate reductions today from the oil and gas industry, in Canada and around the world.”

Ian Bruce, science and policy director at the David Suzuki Foundation, called the federal announcement “a critical solution in Canada’s national climate plan.” He said the federal rules create “a clear responsibility” for the country’s oil and gas sector “to be a stronger partner, joining citizens and communities that are already working hard to reach our country’s climate targets.”

But Krupp cautioned that a “big step forward could be erased, if these federal methane regulations are replaced by weaker provincial action. The national government must now ensure that any provincial rules achieve equal or greater reductions.”

Alberta and the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP) have been arguing for a “site-based” approach to methane monitoring that they say will allow companies to focus their efforts where they’ll have the greatest impact, rather than monitoring every piece of equipment. CAPP had also directly threatened about 7,000 job losses if Ottawa didn’t accept its version of a methane reduction plan.

CAPP claimed its approach would “achieve 70% of the reductions [that Ottawa seeks] at one-third the cost,” The Canadian Press reported at the time. But the national fossil lobby didn’t explain how its members would identify high-risk operations without doing the site-by-site monitoring Ottawa is now insisting on. An aerial survey last year revealed that existing industry estimates of methane emissions from its operations were severely understated.

“We are nowhere near having the measurement and reporting tools needed to make [CAPP’s plan] a credible option,” said the Pembina Institute’s Duncan Kenyon said last fall. “The inherent problem with methane is that it likes to leak, and will leak wherever it can find a weakness.”

This story was updated to include EDF’s estimate of emissions and dollar savings.



in Canada, Energy Politics, Legal & Regulatory, Methane, Oil & Gas

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

Mike Mozart/Flickr
Ending Emissions

BP Predicts Faster Oil and Gas Decline as Clean Energy Spending Hits $1.1T in 2022

January 31, 2023
328
Gina Dittmer/PublicDomainPictures
Canada

Canada Needs Oil and Gas Emissions Cap to Hit 2030 Goal: NZAB

January 31, 2023
196
CONFENIAE
Ending Emissions

Ecuador’s Amazon Drilling Plan Shows Need for Fossil Non-Proliferation Treaty

January 31, 2023
61

Comments 2

  1. Gary Champagne says:
    5 years ago

    Beef cattle very pleased they eere exempt from having to meet any methane reduction targets. That said they are still planning on voting for Kenney as they love bullshit.

    Reply
    • Mitchell Beer says:
      5 years ago

      The lambs are herding together to follow along. But hold on! One of them is standing up in the middle of the crowd and bleating desperately, ‘Wait! Wait! We don’t all have to be just sheep!’

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Mike Mozart/Flickr

BP Predicts Faster Oil and Gas Decline as Clean Energy Spending Hits $1.1T in 2022

January 31, 2023
328
jasonwoodhead23/flickr

Canada, U.K., U.S. Must Cut Oil and Gas 76% by 2030 to Keep 1.5° Alive, New Analysis Finds

March 23, 2022
506
Nuclear Jordan/Facebook

TC Energy Wants to Supply ‘Small-Scale’ Nuclear Reactors to Alberta Tar Sands/Oil Sands

May 4, 2022
399
openthegovernment.org

BREAKING: U.S. Senate Passes Historic $369B Climate Package

August 8, 2022
540
Joshua Doubek/Wikipedia

No New Jobs Came from Alberta’s $4B ‘Job Creation’ Tax Cut for Big Oil

October 6, 2022
502
Sam Balto/YouTube

Elementary School’s Bike Bus Brings ‘Sheer Joy’ to Portland Neighbourhood

October 16, 2022
260

Recent Posts

Gina Dittmer/PublicDomainPictures

Canada Needs Oil and Gas Emissions Cap to Hit 2030 Goal: NZAB

January 31, 2023
196
CONFENIAE

Ecuador’s Amazon Drilling Plan Shows Need for Fossil Non-Proliferation Treaty

January 31, 2023
61
Ken Teegardin www.SeniorLiving.Org/flickr

Virtual Power Plants Hit an ‘Inflection Point’

January 31, 2023
125
/snappy goat

Rainforest Carbon Credits from World’s Biggest Provider are ‘Largely Worthless’, Investigation Finds

January 31, 2023
94
Victorgrigas/wikimedia commons

World Bank Climate Reforms Too ‘Timid and Slow,’ Critics Warn

January 31, 2023
42
Doc Searls/Twitter

Guilbeault Could Intervene on Ontario Greenbelt Development

January 31, 2023
132
Next Post

Plastic particles now infest the Arctic

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}