• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
Biden Approves $8B Oil Extraction Plan in Ecologically Sensitive Alaska March 14, 2023
U.S. Solar Developers Scramble after Silicon Valley Bank Collapse March 14, 2023
$30.9B Price Tag Makes Trans Mountain Pipeline a ‘Catastrophic Boondoggle’ March 14, 2023
UN Buys Tanker, But Funding Gap Could Scuttle Plan to Salvage Oil from ‘Floating Time Bomb’ March 9, 2023
Biden Cuts Fossil Subsidies, But Oil and Gas Still Lines Up for Billions March 9, 2023
Next
Prev

Federal Officials Trace ‘Rigged’ Approval Process for Kinder Morgan

April 24, 2018
Reading time: 2 minutes

gautherottiphaine / Pixabay

gautherottiphaine / Pixabay

 

This is a short summary of a longer investigation by National Observer. Click here to get the whole story.)

National Observer investigative ace Mike De Souza is picking up serious allegations that the federal government’s review process for the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion was “rigged”, not quite 18 months after the federal Cabinet approved the intensely controversial, C$7.4-billion project.

  • Be among the first to read The Energy Mix Weekender
  • A brand new weekly digest containing exclusive and essential climate stories from around the world.
  • The Weekender:The climate news you need.
Subscribe

Federal officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, told De Souza that “a high-ranking public servant instructed them, at least one month before the pipeline was approved, ‘to give cabinet a legally-sound basis to say yes’ to Trans Mountain,” De Souza writes. “These instructions came at a time when the government claimed it was still consulting in good faith with First Nations and had not yet come to a final decision on the pipeline.”

De Souza adds: “Legal experts interviewed by National Observer say these instructions could be a significant matter reviewed by the courts to determine if the government’s approval of Trans Mountain was valid.”

In an April 19 interview with the Observer, Natural Resource Minister Jim Carr said Ottawa fulfilled its duty to First Nations “through a ‘considerably broadened and deepened consultation’ designed to address mistakes made by the previous Harper government in its reviews and oversight of major energy projects,” De Souza writes. “Sources from within different federal departments, however, provide a different perspective about how the Trans Mountain review happened. Their allegation is serious: that the process was rigged following lobbying by Kinder Morgan.”

The Observer details extensive contact between Kinder Morgan Canada and federal officials in the lead-up to the Cabinet decision, including two direct approaches to Bob Hamilton, then the deputy minister of Carr’s department.

The government eventually decided to “shorten the timeline on an expanded review of the pipeline, promised by Trudeau’s Liberals during the 2015 election campaign,” De Souza writes. “Insiders say the instructions given a few months later—to find a way to approve the expansion—were explicit. Public servants were never asked to prepare for the possibility that the government might reject the pipeline, they explain, or restart the federal review using a new and improved process that Trudeau himself had promised.”

De Souza said he confirmed the officials’ accounts by reviewing internal correspondence involving at least two federal departments. Other officials pushed back, comparing the fast-tracked review to the failed regulatory process for the Northern Gateway pipeline.

“Three legal experts on Indigenous law contacted by National Observer said the instructions given to public servants about approving the pipeline project are troubling,” De Souza writes. “The lawyers all warned that these internal orders cast doubt on whether the government was sincere in its efforts to consult and accommodate First Nations on Kinder Morgan’s project—a matter now being reviewed by the Federal Court of Appeal.”

The government’s intentions could make a difference before the court, given the federal duty to consult First Nations under Section 35 of the Constitution. “Based on this requirement, the courts have the power to reverse the government’s approval of Trans Mountain and force it to restart its efforts to consult affected First Nations,” De Souza states.



in Canada, Energy Politics, First Peoples, Legal & Regulatory, Pipelines / Rail Transport

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

U.S. Bureau of Land Management/flickr
Oil & Gas

Biden Approves $8B Oil Extraction Plan in Ecologically Sensitive Alaska

March 14, 2023
82
EcoAnalytics
Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion

Canadians Want Strong Emissions Cap Regulations, Not More Missed Targets

March 14, 2023
92
U.S. National Transportation Safety Board/flickr
Pipelines / Rail Transport

$30.9B Price Tag Makes Trans Mountain Pipeline a ‘Catastrophic Boondoggle’

March 14, 2023
174

Comments 1

  1. Doug Carrick says:
    5 years ago

    Our political system has been completely corrupted by big money, mainly the petroleum industry. Through political donations and lobbying, big money has a thousand times more influence than the individual voter (who is supposed to be controlling our government). Millions of dollars are donated to so-called “Think Tanks” like the Fraser Institute that churn out propaganda telling the public that it is a good thing to lower taxes on corporations and that it is good to get rid of regulations. And most of these activities are done in secret, so the public has no idea of what is really going on. And they hire spin-doctors to use wording that make bad things sound good and the reverse. Thus they talk about world class oil spill cleanups as if they are 99% successful when the best that is ever done is a 10% clean-up – or more accurately, a 90% mess-up. With dilbit, it will be worse.
    In conclusion, what else could we expect than deception and trickery! So it is all the more reason why we have to get off the outdated First Past the Post electoral system which allows corporate-controlled political parties to have 100% of the power with only 39% of the votes. It’s all the more reason for people to wake up and realize to what a degree out democracy has been corruupted.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Behrat/Wikimedia Commons

Hawaii Firm Turns Home Water Heaters into Grid Batteries

March 14, 2023
359
U.S. National Transportation Safety Board/flickr

$30.9B Price Tag Makes Trans Mountain Pipeline a ‘Catastrophic Boondoggle’

March 14, 2023
174
David Dodge, Green Energy Futures/flickr

U.S. Solar Developers Scramble after Silicon Valley Bank Collapse

March 14, 2023
121
U.S. Bureau of Land Management/flickr

Biden Approves $8B Oil Extraction Plan in Ecologically Sensitive Alaska

March 14, 2023
82
moerschy / Pixabay

Fringe Conspiracy Theories Target 15-Minute City Push in Edmonton, Toronto

February 22, 2023
1.6k
EcoAnalytics

Canadians Want Strong Emissions Cap Regulations, Not More Missed Targets

March 14, 2023
92

Recent Posts

Raysonho/wikimedia commons

Purolator Pledges $1B to Electrify Last-Mile Delivery

March 14, 2023
60
United Nations

UN Buys Tanker, But Funding Gap Could Scuttle Plan to Salvage Oil from ‘Floating Time Bomb’

March 10, 2023
90
Gage Skidmore/Wikimedia Commons

Biden Cuts Fossil Subsidies, But Oil and Gas Still Lines Up for Billions

March 10, 2023
177
jasonwoodhead23/flickr

First Nation Scorches Imperial Oil, Alberta Regulator Over Toxic Leak

March 8, 2023
368
MarcusObal/wikimedia commons

No Climate Risk Targets for Banks, New Guides for Green Finance as 2 Federal Agencies Issue New Rules

March 8, 2023
236
FMSC/Flickr

Millions Face Food Insecurity as Horn of Africa Braces for Worst Drought Ever

March 8, 2023
247
Next Post
Jay Phagan/Flickr

Minnesota Judge Nixes Enbridge’s Preferred Route for Line 3 Pipeline

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}