• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
Celebrating our 1,000th edition. The climate news you need
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  FEATURED
BREAKING: 40% of Fossil Fuels Now Under Development Must Stay in the Ground May 17, 2022
Rocky Mountain Glaciers ‘Past Tipping Point’, with Some Expected to Vanish by 2030 May 17, 2022
UK Activists Block Russian Oil Tanker From Docking in Essex May 17, 2022
EXCLUSIVE: Bid to Revive Doomed Nova Scotia LNG Project Collides with Germany’s Net-Zero Plans May 16, 2022
3,800 Residents Ordered to Evacuate after Flooding in Hay River, NWT May 16, 2022
Next
Prev
Home Renewable Energy Bioenergy

1.5°C Is Doable Without Controversial Carbon Capture Technique, New Study Concludes

April 19, 2018
Reading time: 3 minutes

Durban, South Africa climate summit, 2012

Durban, South Africa climate summit, 2012

 

A new study in the journal Nature Climate Change is breaking new ground in the debate about how to limit average global warming to 1.5°C, suggesting for the first time that the target may be achievable with little or no reliance on a controversial and unproven “negative emission” technique, Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS).

“I do believe getting rid of negative emissions totally is not possible—but minimizing them might be attractive,” said lead author Prof. Detlef von Vuuren, senior researcher with the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency. “Negative emissions are not necessarily bad, but it means that one does accept certain risks.”

The new scenario assumes “ambitious but not unrealistic” deployment of renewable electricity, high levels of energy and materials efficiency, agricultural intensification, and reduction of greenhouse gases other than carbon dioxide “using the best-available technologies and further technological progress,” Carbon Brief reports.

It shows improved access to education accelerating a trend toward reduced fertility, so that today’s world population of 7.0 billion peaks at 8.4 billion in 2050, before falling to 6.9 billion in 2100. The majority of the world’s population adopts “sustainable lifestyles”, with less air travel and private automobile use, more walking and cycling, and pretty much everyone adopting healthier diets with less meat consumption.

The paper departs from most 1.5°C scenarios by emphasizing options that “have tended to be excluded from the conversation, because they are hard for scientists to model,” Carbon Brief notes.

The 1.5°C pathways developed until now “have relied on negative emissions from BECCS to suck excess CO2 out of the atmosphere later this century,” writes Deputy Editor Simon Evans. “In part, this reflects the assumption that inertia in the global energy system makes it hard to peak and then eliminate CO2.”

The integrated assessment models (IAMs) at the heart of most low-carbon pathways “select technologies on the basis of relative costs,” the new report states, so that “they normally concentrate on reduction measures for which reasonable estimates of future performance and costs can be made. This implies that some possible response strategies receive less attention, as their future performance is more speculative or their introduction would be based on drivers other than cost, such as lifestyle change or more rapid electrification.”

As well, “existing studies hardly look into more aggressive implementation of options, such as rapid implementation of the best available technologies or deep reduction of non-CO2 [greenhouse gases]. Technology development could also be more rapid than typically assumed in IAM model runs.”

Those factors help explain “why BECCS has become so dominant in the 1.5°C scenarios, even though its widespread deployment faces daunting sociopolitical barriers,” Evans explains. “In contrast, alternative solutions have often been ignored because it is hard to estimate their performance or cost.”

In the new study, “combining all of the mitigation options together effectively eliminates the need for BECCS to stay within a 1.5°C limit,” Carbon Brief notes. “This frees up significant areas of agricultural land in the model, some of which is reforested, resulting in ‘natural’ CO2 removal.”

Carbon Brief describes van Vuuren as “a key figure in the early use of BECCS within climate models” who now considers it “unfortunate” the technology has to come to dominate scenario work on 1.5°C. The more common approach has raised apprehension across the climate community that is likely to reach a crescendo later this year, with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change due to release a special report on 1.5°C pathways ahead of the UN climate conference this December in Katowice, Poland.

“There are major concerns about the sustainability of large-scale deployment of CO2 removal (CDR) technologies, especially in relation to BECCS, but also for large-scale afforestation,” said Dr. Alexander Popp, head of the land-use management group at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research.

While the new study points to a different path, research scholar Dr. Joeri Rogeli at the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis said the fundamental issue for policy-makers is unchanged.

“The core of the mitigation challenge remains the same: global CO2 emissions need to be reduced to zero,” he told Carbon Brief. “What policy-makers should take from this entire body of research on 1.5°C scenarios is that there is a variety of avenues one can pursue to limit CO2 emissions, and that these different avenues or strategies allow to limit the contribution of potentially undesirable technologies like BECCS.”



in Bioenergy, CCS & Negative Emissions, COP Conferences, Ending Emissions, Food Security, Forests & Deforestation, International Agencies & Studies, Soil & Natural Sequestration

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

John Englart
Australia

Australia’s Climate Election: Voters Kick Morrison to the Curb

May 23, 2022
259
Shutterstock
Carbon Levels & Measurement

Greenhouse Gases Trap 49% More Heat than in 1990, NOAA Index Concludes

May 23, 2022
97
Can Pac Swire/flickr
Finance & Investment

Critics Pounce, HSBC Disavows Exec Who Cautions Against ‘Unsubstantiated, Shrill’ Climate Warnings

May 23, 2022
80

Comments 1

  1. Veronica-Mae Soar says:
    4 years ago

    agricultural intensification ? how on earth do they suggest this is going to reduce carbon ? it is agricultural intensification that has contributed to the release of tons of carbon and destroyed the soil which should be a carbon sink.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

MustangJoe/Pixabay

Newfoundland Opens New Round of Offshore Oil Bidding

May 19, 2022
278
John Englart

Australia’s Climate Election: Voters Kick Morrison to the Curb

May 23, 2022
259
@Olihorn1/Twitter

10 Dead, 300,000 Without Power as Sudden Storm Ravages Southern Ontario, Quebec

May 23, 2022
152
http://www.greenpeace.org/canada/en/campaigns/Energy/tarsands/

Alberta Fossils Log Emission Cuts by Exporting Them

May 23, 2022
104
Shutterstock

Greenhouse Gases Trap 49% More Heat than in 1990, NOAA Index Concludes

May 23, 2022
97
Can Pac Swire/flickr

Critics Pounce, HSBC Disavows Exec Who Cautions Against ‘Unsubstantiated, Shrill’ Climate Warnings

May 23, 2022
80

Recent Posts

Province of B.C./flickr

B.C. Eliminates ‘Broken’ Royalty System, Offers Fossils a ‘Money-Back Guarantee’

May 23, 2022
74
fda54 / Pixabay

ESG Investors Urge Livestock Industry to Diversify, Innovate to Dodge ‘Apollo 13 Moment’

May 23, 2022
60
/pxfuel

Study Finds ‘Ironic’ Link Between Reduced Pollution, More Hurricanes

May 23, 2022
73
Pexels/Pixabay

$8.5B in Debt Guarantees to Help South Africa Phase Out Coal

May 23, 2022
41
Asurnipal/wikimedia commons

Economic Opportunity, ‘Freedom’ Drive Red State Buy-In for Renewables

May 23, 2022
43
Wikimedia Commons

Bahamas to Offer ‘Blue Carbon’ Credits for Ecosystem Protection

May 23, 2022
67
Next Post
The cocoa harvest is now a little more secure than it was. Image: By ICCFO

Company averts climate chocolate threat

The Energy Mix

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}

2022 ONTARIO GENERAL ELECTION

KEEP UP WITH ONTARIO’S CLIMATE CHANGE ELECTION

election-checkmark
Get Election Notifications

2022 ONTARIO GENERAL ELECTION

KEEP UP WITH ONTARIO’S CLIMATE CHANGE ELECTION

election-checkmark
Get Election Notifications
The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

2022 ONTARIO GENERAL ELECTION

KEEP UP WITH ONTARIO’S CLIMATE CHANGE ELECTION

election-checkmark
Get Election Notifications

2022 ONTARIO GENERAL ELECTION

KEEP UP WITH ONTARIO’S CLIMATE CHANGE ELECTION

election-checkmark
Get Election Notifications
The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

2022 Ontario General Election

Keep up with Ontario’s Climate Change Election

election-checkmark
GET THE NEWS THAT MATTERS MOST

2022 Ontario General Election

Keep up with Ontario’s Climate Change Election

election-checkmark
GET THE NEWS THAT MATTERS MOST
The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

2022 Ontario General Election

Keep up with Ontario’s Climate Change Election

election-checkmark
GET THE NEWS THAT MATTERS MOST

2022 Ontario General Election

Keep up with Ontario’s Climate Change Election

election-checkmark
GET THE NEWS THAT MATTERS MOST
The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?