• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
  FEATURED
BREAKING: Fossil Fuels Fall 25% by 2030, Renewables ‘Keep the Path Open’ in IEA Net-Zero Update September 26, 2023
Green Space Groups Gear for Bigger Fights After Ontario Reverses Greenbelt Land Grab September 25, 2023
Community-Driven Solutions Can Take Back Ontario’s Electricity Future: Torrie September 25, 2023
‘Apex Oil and Gas Lobby’ Undercuts Canadian Sovereignty, Laxer Tells Foreign Influence Probe September 25, 2023
Momentum Builds Toward COP 28 as Countries Back Fossil Fuel Phaseout September 25, 2023
Next
Prev

U.S. Gas Boom Needs $170 Billion for New Pipelines, with New Investment Risks Looming

April 12, 2018
Reading time: 4 minutes

Rosemary Oakeshott/Geograph

Rosemary Oakeshott/Geograph

 

The U.S. natural gas industry is running into a choice between untenable options: spend a mind-bending US$170 billion on pipelines, compressor stations, export terminals, and other infrastructure over the next seven years, or risk losing momentum on a shale gas production boom that has roiled global oil and gas markets and driven the country’s dreams of energy “dominance”.

The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) foresees the country’s natural gas production growing by 24 billion cubic feet, or 32%, from 2017 to 2025. But “one threat to the U.S. being able to export [liquefied natural gas] and expand its export capability is the overall commitment to invest in infrastructure to move natural gas,” said Meg Gentle, CEO of gas exporter Tellurian Inc.

  • Be among the first to read The Energy Mix Weekender
  • A brand new weekly digest containing exclusive and essential climate stories from around the world.
  • The Weekender:The climate news you need.
Subscribe

“It’s a warning that, for parts of the country, the pipeline woes aren’t over yet,” Bloomberg notes. “Appalachian producers have been grappling for the better part of the shale boom of the past decade with limited pipeline access.” And “the Permian Basin, known for its oil-rich layers of rock, is facing the threat of having to slow down the output of crude because drillers lack capacity to handle all the gas that’s flowing as a mere byproduct.”

But while fossil analysts see little political opposition to new natural gas infrastructure in West Texas, other news reports point to a mounting list of obstacles—beginning with investors who are becoming jaded about the expenses exploration and production (E&P) companies incur to get shale oil and gas out of the ground.

“Investors are taking a wait-and-see attitude toward the stocks of the top U.S. shale oil and gas drillers and are unsure if those companies will keep spending under control as the price of oil goes higher,” Standard & Poors Global Market Intelligence reports this week, noting that nearly half of the 22 companies covered in a recent analysis are looking ahead to double-digit percentage spending increases this year.

That’s capturing the attention of analysts like Michael Scialla of Stifel Nicolaus & Co., who warned late last month that the 22 stocks lost 3% over their value in the year ending April 10, a period when the S&P 500 gained 13%. He warned that “E&P stocks underperformed the broader market and oil prices,” extending a trend already established over a two-year period, with the majority of companies spending more than investors would have preferred.

“E&Ps have a long history of out-spending (including the last three years),” said Barclays oilfield services analyst William Thompson, although “a behavioural shift may be in store, since investor demands for higher returns really hit a fever pitch last September.”

On Resilience.org, veteran fossil analyst David Hughes points to a more fundamental problem that undercuts the EIA’s “remarkably optimistic” projections for the sector—and could ultimately drive shale companies to hike spending in an effort to squeeze more oil and gas out of their wells.

The EIA “projects that shale gas production will be 130% higher in 2050 than in 2016, while tight oil production will grow by 74%, all at relatively low prices,” Hughes writes. “This despite the fact that average production from individual wells falls 70 to 90% in the first three years and entire fields would decline 20 to 40% a year if new wells weren’t constantly drilled.”

Which means that, to keep up with their past expenditures and fill $170 billion worth of new pipelines and assorted infrastructure, shale producers would have to keep pouring money into new wells, while their investors watch out for any sign of them abandoning what Thompson calls “the capital discipline mantra”.

After reviewing the same well production database the EIA uses in its analysis, Hughes concludes that the Trump administration agency “has overestimated the likely future production of shale gas and tight oil for most plays by a wide margin. This is a result of overestimating the size of the prospective area and hence the number of wells that can be drilled, and underestimating future declines in well productivity.” He adds that the EIA’s estimates are “much higher than those of the U.S. Geological Survey and the University of Texas Bureau of Economic Geology.”

Yet the EIA’s figures still have the aura of official truth, even though Hughes finds the results “baffling and worrisome. It’s one thing for industry to paint a rosy picture of future production, but something altogether different when a government agency—tasked with providing the American public with objective information—does it.”

The other threat on the horizon for shale producers is the plummeting cost of renewable energy and energy storage. “Plentiful and relatively inexpensive as a result of the nation’s fracking boom,” natural gas “has been portrayed as a bridge to an era in which alternative energy would take primacy,” the New York Times reports. “But technology and economics have carved a different, shorter pathway that has bypassed the broad need for some fossil fuel plants.”

As cleaner, less expensive alternatives take hold, “some utility companies have scrapped plans for new natural gas plants in favour of wind and solar sources that have become cheaper and easier to install,” the Times notes. “Existing gas plants are being shut because their economics are no longer attractive. And regulators are increasingly challenging the plans of companies determined to move forward with new natural gas plants.”

“It’s a very different world that we’re arriving at very quickly,” said Portland, Oregon energy consultant Robert McCullough. “That wind farm can literally be put on a train and brought online within a year. It’s moving so fast that even critics of the old path like myself have been taken by surprise.”



in Energy / Carbon Pricing & Economics

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

UNDP/flickr
Heat & Power

Community-Driven Solutions Can Take Back Ontario’s Electricity Future: Torrie

September 26, 2023
102
UniEnergy Technologies/wikimedia commons
Batteries / Storage

Multi-Day Storage Can Deliver Cheaper Grid Reliability, Battery Maker Says

September 25, 2023
64
Power lines, Mississauga, Canada
First Peoples

Two First Nations Groups Vie to Build Northern Ontario Power Line

September 25, 2023
76

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Jason Blackeye/Unsplash

BREAKING: Fossil Fuels Fall 25% by 2030, Renewables ‘Keep the Path Open’ in IEA Net-Zero Update

September 26, 2023
213
Cullen328/wikimedia commons

Manufactured Housing Could Dent the Affordable Housing Crunch with Energy-Efficient Designs

September 20, 2023
388
Wilson Hui/flickr

‘Apex Oil and Gas Lobby’ Undercuts Canadian Sovereignty, Laxer Tells Foreign Influence Probe

September 26, 2023
102
UNDP/flickr

Community-Driven Solutions Can Take Back Ontario’s Electricity Future: Torrie

September 26, 2023
102
Duffins Agriculture Preserve/North Country House Media via Greenbelt Foundation

Green Space Groups Gear for Bigger Fights After Ontario Reverses Greenbelt Land Grab

September 25, 2023
89
United Nations/Twitter

Momentum Builds Toward COP 28 as Countries Back Fossil Fuel Phaseout

September 26, 2023
80

Recent Posts

UniEnergy Technologies/wikimedia commons

Multi-Day Storage Can Deliver Cheaper Grid Reliability, Battery Maker Says

September 25, 2023
64
David Mellis/flickr

Top Food Brands Prepare for Supply Chains Disrupted by Climate Change

September 25, 2023
51
Power lines, Mississauga, Canada

Two First Nations Groups Vie to Build Northern Ontario Power Line

September 25, 2023
76
UN Climate Change/flickr

Don’t Attend COP 28 Unless You’re There to Help, Figueres Tells Oil and Gas

September 24, 2023
471
Jon Sullivan/flickr

Thorold Gas Peaker Plant Won’t Be Built After Unanimous City Council Vote

September 21, 2023
674
Rewat Wannasuk/Pexels

Virtual Power Plants Could Cut Peak Demand 20%, Save U.S. Grid $10B Per Year

September 20, 2023
128
Next Post
SD-Pictures/Pixabay

EDF Satellite Will Monitor Fossils’ Worldwide Methane Emissions

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
The Energy Mix - Energy Central
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}