• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
Analyst Sees Oil and Gas Running Short of Cash as IEA Releases Energy Investment Update May 30, 2023
House of Commons Motion, Senate Bill Urge New Climate Rules for Financial Institutions May 30, 2023
13 Canadian Fossils Linked to Massive Losses in Western Wildfires May 30, 2023
Hamilton Plans Heat Bylaw for Rental Housing May 30, 2023
Supreme Court Decision Undercuts U.S. Clean Water Act May 30, 2023
Next
Prev

‘Circular Logic’ in New Shell Scenario ‘Appears Not to Understand’ Paris Goals

April 1, 2018
Reading time: 4 minutes

Catherine Hammond/wikimedia commons

Catherine Hammond/wikimedia commons

 

Massive continuing reliance on fossil fuels, rapid growth in the use of hydrogen fuel, changes in consumer mindsets and energy efficiency practices, net-zero deforestation, a mere 10,000 new carbon capture and storage (CCS) plants around the world, and global carbon pricing mechanisms to encourage CCS are hallmarks of Royal Dutch Shell’s new scenario for keeping average global warming below 2.0°C between now and 2070.

In a scathing critique of the company’s Sky scenario, released last week, Oil Change International notes that the plan was largely driven by “pressure from the company’s shareholders to explain the risks to their investments arising from efforts to cut emissions,” after Michael Bloomberg’s Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures urged companies and investors to stress-test their portfolios against scenarios where the world acts on climate change.

  • The climate news you need. Subscribe now to our engaging new weekly digest.
  • You’ll receive exclusive, never-before-seen-content, distilled and delivered to your inbox every weekend.
  • The Weekender: Succinct, solutions-focused, and designed with the discerning reader in mind.
Subscribe

“Shell’s new report does not provide a stress test, because it describes a future with so much oil and gas that the company faces no stress,” writes Research Director Greg Muttitt. “The lesson is simple: If you want to know how to fix climate change, don’t ask a company that wants to sell you more oil and gas.”

In Shell’s version of a “rapid energy transition”, 2050 dawns with oil, natural gas, and coal at 88%, 93%, and 62% of their current consumption levels.

The Sky scenario “was designed to imagine a world that complies with the goals of the Paris climate agreement, managing to hold the planet’s warming to ‘well below’ a rise of 2.0°C, or 3.6°F, above preindustrial levels,” the Washington Post reports. “Shell has said that it supports the Paris agreement,” even though nearly 94% of its shareholders voted down a proposal last year to set production targets in line with the Paris deal.

During the company’s 2017 AGM in The Hague, shareholders “spent hours questioning Shell’s board members, who said that while the company supported the Paris agreement, setting company targets was ‘not in the best interest of the company,’” The Independent reported at the time.

Now, Shell’s latest future scenario projects hydrogen accounting for 10% of global energy consumption by 2100. It “envisages that as fossil fuel use declines, old oil and gas facilities will be repurposed for hydrogen storage and transport,” The Guardian explains. “Shell has no large-scale hydrogen production but is a major player in natural gas, from which hydrogen can be made. The company launched its first hydrogen refuelling point in the UK last year,” and opened a second one last week.

“Sky recognizes that simply extending current efforts will not be enough for the scale of change required. There will need to be both big changes in climate policies to encourage investment and innovation, and mass deployment of disruptive new technologies,” Forbes states. But the report claims a “lack of a clear development pathway” for phasing out coal, while pointing to “stubborn” parts of the energy system that will be tough to decarbonize.

“The apparent lack of low-carbon solutions for aviation, shipping, cement manufacture, some chemicals processes, smelting, glass manufacture, and others means that significant sectors of the industrial economy won’t trend rapidly to zero emissions,” it states. “Even the power sector could still need support from conventional thermal generation in 2050.”

“How can such a future be aligned with the Paris goals?” Oil Change asks. “The answer is that it’s not.”

Muttitt notes that the Paris goal is to keep average global warming “well below” the 2.0°C threshold, recognizing the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)’s strongly-stated preference for a 1.5°C “buffer zone” over a 2.0°C “guardrail”.

But “Shell appears not to understand this,” he writes. “The ‘Sky’ scenario aims for a two-in-three probability of keeping warming below 2.0°C, but this is only achieved if new technology is invented to suck carbon out of the atmosphere, as well as a dramatic turnaround in technology for capturing and burying carbon emissions.” By 2070, “the Shell scenario has eight billion tonnes of carbon dioxide sucked out of the atmosphere, which (if the technology works) could require a land area up to five times the size of India. Another 10 billion tonnes is captured when emitted. This combined 18 billion tonnes is equivalent to about half of today’s emissions.”

That means Shell “proposes gambling on the invention of new technologies, in order to have a modest chance of avoiding the severe dangers at and above 2.0°C. That is not ‘stringent defence’ of the 2.0°C limit. It is not ‘pursuing efforts’ to keep warming to 1.5°C. It is not aligned with the Paris goals.”

Muttitt adds that the “circular logic” in the Sky scenario “argues that capital investment locks in oil production, preventing a faster pace of change” that would leave colossal fossils like Shell with stranded assets. “From 2018 to around 2030, there is clear recognition that the potential for dramatic short-term change in the energy system is limited, given the installed base of capital,” the scenario report states—this from a company that previously said it would only face significant financial losses if energy systems changed over in less than 11.5 years, the estimated life of its proven fossil reserves.

“Investors may well feel frustrated at Shell’s circular logic, and at the company’s inability to seriously engage on the question of risk,” Muttitt writes. “But this also returns us to the question of Shell’s responsibility. If new investments lock in production and emissions, then every time Shell builds a new platform or pipeline, or drills a new well, the company is committing the world to increased climate change. This tacit admission may be useful in the growing number of climate lawsuits against Shell and other oil companies.”

And Shell isn’t alone. In its energy transition scenario released earlier in March, BP projected renewable energy technologies growing five-fold, but to only 14% of global demand, by 2040.



in CCS & Negative Emissions, Coal, Community Climate Finance, COP Conferences, Ending Emissions, International Agencies & Studies, Oil & Gas

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

/Piqusels
Finance & Investment

Analyst Sees Oil and Gas Running Short of Cash as IEA Releases Energy Investment Update

May 31, 2023
325
Ryan Turnbull/Facebook
Legal & Regulatory

House of Commons Motion, Senate Bill Urge New Climate Rules for Financial Institutions

May 30, 2023
128
David Dodge, Green Energy Futures/flickr
Jobs & Training

Clean Energy to Add 700,000 New Jobs by 2050, with Alberta in the Lead

May 30, 2023
117

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

/Piqusels

Analyst Sees Oil and Gas Running Short of Cash as IEA Releases Energy Investment Update

May 31, 2023
325
Neal Alderson/Twitter

Out-of-Control Wildfire Burns Homes, Forces Evacuations Outside Halifax

May 29, 2023
2.4k
Martin Davis/Facebook

13 Canadian Fossils Linked to Massive Losses in Western Wildfires

May 30, 2023
521
Ryan Turnbull/Facebook

House of Commons Motion, Senate Bill Urge New Climate Rules for Financial Institutions

May 30, 2023
128
David Dodge, Green Energy Futures/flickr

Clean Energy to Add 700,000 New Jobs by 2050, with Alberta in the Lead

May 30, 2023
117
York Region/flickr

Hamilton Plans Heat Bylaw for Rental Housing

May 31, 2023
365

Recent Posts

David/flickr

Supreme Court Decision Undercuts U.S. Clean Water Act

May 30, 2023
47
Nicolas Rénac/Flickr

Climate Change to Cut Coffee Growing Lands by Over 50%

May 30, 2023
48
ValiGreceanu/Pixabay

Report Urges Tax Hike for Luxury Air Travel, ‘Pets on Jets’

May 30, 2023
41
Jörg Möller/Pixabay

UK Traffic Calming Strategy Produces Solid Results, Manufactured Anxiety

May 29, 2023
81

Waste Heat from Quebec Data Centre to Grow 80,000 Tonnes of Veggies Per Year

May 29, 2023
114
kpgolfpro/Pixabay

Community Wind Farm Earns Support, Generates Income in German Village

May 29, 2023
71
Next Post
tpsdave / Pixabay

U.S. Judge Shoots Down ‘Wild Stretch of Logic’ in Exxon’s Climate Fraud Defence

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}