• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
Celebrating our 1,000th edition. The climate news you need
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  FEATURED
BREAKING: U.S. Senate Passes Historic $369B Climate Package August 7, 2022
Researchers Point To ‘Dangerously Unexplored’ Risk of Global Climate Catastrophe August 2, 2022
Koch Network Pressures Manchin, Sinema as Advocates Praise ‘Game Changing’ Climate Deal August 2, 2022
Coastal GasLink Cost Skyrockets 70% to $11.2B August 2, 2022
Ottawa Releases Regulatory ‘Frame’ for Net-Zero Grid by 2035 August 2, 2022
Next
Prev

B.C. Unveils Tax Incentives for $40-Billion LNG Export Terminal

March 23, 2018
Reading time: 5 minutes

LNG Canada/Facebook

LNG Canada/Facebook

 

British Columbia Premier John Horgan has unveiled a package of tax incentives to support a massive new liquefied natural gas (LNG) export terminal at Kitimat, B.C., just as Royal Dutch Shell and its partners approach a final investment decision on the C$40-billion LNG Canada project.

Horgan maintained the project would be consistent with his government’s promise to reduce B.C.’s greenhouse gas emissions 40% by 2030—a commitment that is a cornerstone of the New Democrats’ governing agreement with the Green Party of B.C. If it received regulatory approval, the project would be the biggest private sector investment in B.C. history, producing up to 10,000 jobs during construction and up to 950 permanent positions, Horgan’s office said in a release. The province also expects the project to bring in $22 billion in direct government revenue over 40 years, CBC reports.

Weeks before the announcement, the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers secured the province’s assurance that its upcoming scientific inquiry into the natural gas fracking industry would not cover emissions or public health risk, according to documents obtained by DeSmog Canada.

“No premier or government can dismiss this kind of critical economic opportunity for the people of British Columbia,” Horgan said in the release. “But neither will we turn our back on our commitment to climate targets, or our path to reconciliation with Indigenous peoples.” The incentives B.C. is offering LNG Canada include provincial sales tax relief, new greenhouse gas emission standards, low industrial electricity rates, and elimination of the province’s LNG income tax.

“I’m standing before you today and speaking directly to the people of British Columbia and saying there may well be a final investment decision on an LNG facility in northern British Columbia, and should that happen, we will put in place a framework that will allow them to be competitive,” Horgan told media in Victoria yesterday.

“I don’t believe at all for a minute that this is going to be easy,” he said. “This is going to be very, very difficult, but we’re committed to making sure it works.”

The release from Horgan’s office said the new policy framework for this and any other future LNG projects would guarantee a fair return for B.C.’s natural resources, guarantee jobs and training for B.C. residents, respect and “make partners of” First Nations, protect the province’s air and water, and live up to its climate commitments. “Our new approach welcomes investment that puts our province’s people and future first, and rejects the old ways of resource development at any cost,” Horgan said. “Our obligation is to the people who call British Columbia home, and our job is to get the best deal for them and the generations that follow.”

Horgan acknowledged that Green Leader Andrew Weaver wasn’t onboard with all aspects of the new LNG framework. “Andrew’s very passionate about combating climate change,” he said. “It’s his reason for being in this legislature and he makes no apologies for that, nor should he.” But Weaver told media his caucus wouldn’t bring down the government over the plan—rather, the Greens’ support is “predicated on government developing a climate plan to meet our targets.”

“Our goal is not to throw down the government. Our goal is to get the government to deliver on the confidence and supply agreement,” he said. “We’re not making a threat…show us the climate plan that will deliver this target, and we will continue to have confidence in government.”

That may be easier said than done, according to the Pembina Institute, where Acting B.C. Director Karen Tam Wu said Horgan hadn’t shown how the LNG incentives and the climate plan would dovetail.

“The government is now promising LNG development can proceed and we can meet our 2030 and 2050 climate targets,” she said in a release. “Questions remain regarding how the carbon pollution associated with proposed LNG projects will fit within the province’s carbon budget. Major LNG development would require significant emissions reductions in the gas supply chain, and an increase in the scale of emissions reductions needed in other sectors of the economy.”

“Although the government has consistently reiterated its commitment to B.C.’s climate targets, the announcement did not explain how the gas sector will be required to reduce its carbon pollution,” Tam Wu added. “We look forward to seeing a new suite of measures introduced and implemented to reduce carbon pollution across all economic sectors—otherwise we risk missing our climate targets and passing up the benefits of clean growth.”

The week before the LNG Canada announcement, DeSmog Canada was out with the news that B.C.’s fracking inquiry will fail to address two of the most worrying impacts of natural gas development—and that Horgan’s government gave fossil lobbyists an advance heads-up on the decision. “You have the preeminent industry association in the country given six weeks’ advance notice not only about the inquiry itself, but a clear indication that key things are simply not going to be addressed,” Ben Parfitt, an investigative journalist with the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, told DeSmog. “I am extremely worried, and all the groups that signed on to a call for an inquiry are extremely concerned about what we see here.”

Rather than addressing key concerns about emissions and public health, the focus of the inquiry will be limited to water use and induced earthquakes from fracking operations. It’ll be conducted in April and May by a panel of three academics. “None of the 17 organizations that made the call for a public inquiry into fracking were notified of government’s intentions to launch a scientific panel,” DeSmog notes.

The DeSmog story points to a recent compendium of 1,300 peer-reviewed studies, reports, and investigations, recently released by the Physicians for Social Responsibility and the Concerned Health Professionals of New York. The report found “no evidence that fracking can be practiced in a manner that does not threaten human health,” said co-author Barbara Gottlieb, PSR’s environment and health director.

“I’m so glad to hear there is going to be a government scientific review of fracking,” she told DeSmog. “I’m struck there are no health voices on the panel.”

“For a long time the information was largely anecdotal, largely at the level of symptoms, so we’d see people living near fracking sites had headaches or sudden and severe nosebleeds,” she added. But now, DeSmog writes, “recent research has demonstrated a real statistical correlation between those living close to fracking sites and an increase in hospitalization for numerous causes, including increased asthma, harm to fetuses, and premature birth, which is the leading cause of premature death in infants in the U.S.”

The inquiry will also sidestep questions about greenhouse gas emissions, despite recent research showing much higher rates of “fugitive” methane emissions than had previously been attributed to the province’s oil and gas infrastructure. “I think unfortunately that this is a very, very, very narrowly focused scientific review,” said David Suzuki Foundation scientist John Werring, adding that the methane itself comes along with a soup of other dangerous substances.

“When we’re talking, for example, about the issue of fugitive emissions, they contain potentially toxic components that have adverse impacts on human health. These are things like benzene, toluene, and hydrogen sulfide gas,” he said. But “there is nothing here in the government’s scientific review that they are going to look at the human health impacts. Nothing.”



in Canada, Carbon Levels & Measurement, Community Climate Finance, First Peoples, Health & Safety, Methane, Oil & Gas, Sub-National Governments

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

openthegovernment.org
United States

BREAKING: U.S. Senate Passes Historic $369B Climate Package

August 8, 2022
280
jasonwoodhead23/flickr
Energy Politics

Fossils Dismiss Federal Emissions Cap as ‘Aggressive’, ‘Unrealistic’

August 8, 2022
135
Early stages of construction on the Flamanville 3 nuclear reactor in France
Nuclear

Failing French Nuclear Plants Drive Up Electricity Costs as Heat Waves Cut Production

August 8, 2022
307

Comments 1

  1. Dave Ferguson says:
    4 years ago

    Jesus wept

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Joseph Brent/Flickr

Green Hydrogen Will Cost Less than Fossil-Fuelled ‘Blue’, Shell CEO Admits

August 7, 2022
590
openthegovernment.org

BREAKING: U.S. Senate Passes Historic $369B Climate Package

August 8, 2022
280
Early stages of construction on the Flamanville 3 nuclear reactor in France

Failing French Nuclear Plants Drive Up Electricity Costs as Heat Waves Cut Production

August 8, 2022
307
David Wilson/wikimedia commons

U.S. State Treasurers Use Public Office to Thwart Climate Action, Investigation Finds

August 7, 2022
133
/MaxPixels

‘Substantial Damage’, No Injuries as Freight Train Hits Wind Turbine Blade

May 25, 2022
5.6k
Green Energy Futures/flickr

Solar Shingle Buying Guide Lays Out Options for Curious Homeowners

August 7, 2022
146

Recent Posts

jasonwoodhead23/flickr

Fossils Dismiss Federal Emissions Cap as ‘Aggressive’, ‘Unrealistic’

August 8, 2022
135
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/

Canadians Share Stories of Fear, Vulnerability from 2021 Heat Dome

August 7, 2022
68
Brian Jeffery Beggerly/Wikimedia Commons

China’s Latest Renewables Plan Could Bridge Global 1.5°C Gap, Expert Says

August 7, 2022
139
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service - Pacific Region/Wikimedia Commons

Australia Bans New Coal Mine to Protect Great Barrier Reef, Faces Call for Full Moratorium

August 7, 2022
78
The Come Up Show/flickr

Celebrities, Influencers See Backlash for Private Jet Emissions

August 7, 2022
63
alexxxis/Pixabay

Cambridge University to Rename BP Institute Following Student Backlash

August 7, 2022
48
Next Post

Pro-Nuke Environmentalists Ignore Nuclear Weapons Link

The Energy Mix

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}