• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
  FEATURED
REVEALED: Imperial Oil, Alberta Regulator Knew of Toxic Seepage at Kearl Mine for Years, Kept First Nation in the Dark October 3, 2023
Oil and Gas, Buildings Drive 2.1% Rise in Canada’s Climate Pollution October 2, 2023
Shell CEO Doubles Down on Renewable Cuts Despite Internal Pushback October 2, 2023
Leading Climate Models Underestimate Clean Energy Progress, Overstate Cost, Study Finds October 2, 2023
UAE Holds Major Oil and Gas Conference Before Hosting COP 28 Climate Summit October 2, 2023
Next
Prev

Roberts Suggests Reality Check for 100% Renewables, Deep Decarbonization Targets

February 21, 2018
Reading time: 3 minutes

TAFE SA TONSLEY/Flickr

TAFE SA TONSLEY/Flickr

 

Veteran energy and climate writer David Roberts is out with a provocative look at whether it’s realistic to power the global economy with 100% renewable energy, and whether deep decarbonization is possible by 2100.

His conclusions: We can’t be sure 100% RE is  realistic, but that doesn’t mean backing away from the all-out effort to make it happen. And while deep decarbonization is doable by the end of this century, it’ll be some time before we’ll know whether carbon capture and storage (CCS) and nuclear are essential pieces of the puzzle.

  • The climate news you need. Subscribe now to our engaging new weekly digest.
  • You’ll receive exclusive, never-before-seen-content, distilled and delivered to your inbox every weekend.
  • The Weekender: Succinct, solutions-focused, and designed with the discerning reader in mind.
Subscribe

In a column for Vox, Roberts reviews recent scholarship on how to achieve the 80 to 100% decarbonization required to hit the targets in the Paris agreement, a process that is “going to involve an enormous amount of electrification.” That’s a big problem, he says, because solar and wind energy are not dispatchable for grid operators, and the current best candidate for dispatchable power is nuclear, CCS proposed by some as a critical solution-in-waiting.

All of which triggers a raging debate, Roberts says, about whether it’s possible or advisable to try to decarbonize the grid without those two technologies.

Thinking through that question, he confirms that balancing variable renewable energy (VRE) without nuclear and CCS will require “a lot of new transmission, a lot of new storage, a lot of demand management, and a lot of new hydro, biogas, geothermal, and whatever else we can think of.” (Those last four being, in fact, dispatchable.)

So the first step is still to move forward hard and fast on renewable energy, since “we have a solid understanding of how to push VRE up to around 60% of grid power.” While “the fight to get 5% up to 60 is going to be epic,” he notes that “political and social barriers will do more to slow that growth than any technical limitation, especially in the short- to mid-term.” Up to that point, “none of these potential future limitations are any reason to let up on the push” to install variable renewables, and avoid natural gas lock-in at all costs.

But any hope of avoiding use of nuclear or CCS means taking the problem of variability seriously, since “as VRE increases, it will begin to run into technical and economic problems,” so that variable renewables plus storage are unlikely to get the world economy into deep decarbonization territory.

Which is why, in an opinion that will be challenged by many, Roberts argues that “from a decarbonization perspective, allowing a nuclear power plant to close (before, say, literally any coal plant) is a self-inflicted wound.” He adds that “every megawatt of dispatchable, carbon-free power capacity that is operating safely should be zealously guarded,” which means utilities must “keep nuclear power plants open as long as possible.”

Finally, while CCS is “an environmental nightmare in every way other than carbon emissions, to say nothing of its wretched economics and dodgy politics,” he concludes that “we’re going to need CCS regardless, so we might as well figure it out.”

Roberts doesn’t toss out the idea of 100% renewables completely—he says anyone inclined to argue against the target should consider whether it’s reasonable “to demand that a new system must demonstrate in advance that it is fully prepared to substitute for today’s system.” And he warns against adopting or ruling out options based on literature reviews that are susceptible to common biases, or cost-minimizing models that rarely minimize all the costs, “consistently and woefully” underestimate the falling cost and rapid growth of renewable energy, and “leave out many environmental impacts, along with more intangible social benefits like community control, security, or independence.”

Roberts’ ultimate advice for the scientists in the room is to “basically research everything. Test, experiment, deploy, refine.”  He urges anyone looking for the best path to deep decarbonization—whether or not it’s 100% renewable—to “keep an open mind, support a range of bet-hedging experiments and initiatives, and maintain a healthy allergy to dogma.”



in CCS & Negative Emissions, Ending Emissions, Heat & Power, Nuclear, Solar, Wind

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

Dawn Ellner/flickr
Carbon Levels & Measurement

Oil and Gas, Buildings Drive 2.1% Rise in Canada’s Climate Pollution

October 2, 2023
62
Solarimo/pixabay
Ending Emissions

Leading Climate Models Underestimate Clean Energy Progress, Overstate Cost, Study Finds

October 2, 2023
261
Northvolt plant in Sweden, Spisen/wikimedia commons
Batteries / Storage

Quebec Lands $7B Battery Gigafactory Investment from Sweden’s Northvolt

October 2, 2023
62

Comments 1

  1. Frances Deverell says:
    6 years ago

    I agree that we should not shut down existing nuclear power until we have to for safety reasons, but I don’t believe in investing our money in new nuclear facilities or renewal of old ones. The financial investment should go into the technology required to balance the load with variable renewables and new forms of energy storage to balance the load as well as high speed transmission lines to get the energy from one locale to another. Big investment dollars have to build the future decarbonized society. And it is not our job to ensure that oil or coal or even gas companies can get every bit of their holdings out of the ground before we make the change. Investment in pipelines to move carbon fuels is a delay in creating the necessary infrastructure to maintain a modern lifestyle without carbon fuels. We have to commit to building the renewable energy future. Let’s start by ending subsidies to carbon fuels and moving them over to building renewable infrastructure and supporting the needed R&D.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

jasonwoodhead23/flickr

REVEALED: Imperial Oil, Alberta Regulator Knew of Toxic Seepage at Kearl Mine for Years, Kept First Nation in the Dark

October 3, 2023
147
Ramon FVelasquez/Wikipedia

Shell CEO Doubles Down on Renewable Cuts Despite Internal Pushback

October 2, 2023
142
Iota 9/Wikimedia Commons

‘Huge Loss’ for Local Green Economy as Vancouver Shutters Its Economic Commission

September 28, 2023
359
YouTube

UAE Holds Major Oil and Gas Conference Before Hosting COP 28 Climate Summit

October 3, 2023
75
Solarimo/pixabay

Leading Climate Models Underestimate Clean Energy Progress, Overstate Cost, Study Finds

October 2, 2023
261
Jon Sullivan/flickr

Thorold Gas Peaker Plant Won’t Be Built After Unanimous City Council Vote

September 21, 2023
880

Recent Posts

Dawn Ellner/flickr

Oil and Gas, Buildings Drive 2.1% Rise in Canada’s Climate Pollution

October 2, 2023
62
Northvolt plant in Sweden, Spisen/wikimedia commons

Quebec Lands $7B Battery Gigafactory Investment from Sweden’s Northvolt

October 2, 2023
62
GFDL/Wikimedia Commons

Clean Energy Funding Isn’t Just About Money, Policy Expert Warns

October 2, 2023
39
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center/Wikimedia Commons

Climate Change Brings Rapid Ice Loss to Antarctica, Arctic, Swiss Glaciers

October 2, 2023
58
Duffins Agriculture Preserve/North Country House Media via Greenbelt Foundation

Green Space Groups Gear for Bigger Fights After Ontario Reverses Greenbelt Land Grab

September 28, 2023
221
DiscoverEganville/wikimedia commons

EV Rentals to Improve Transportation Access for Ontario Townships

September 28, 2023
82
Next Post
Alfred Palmer/Wikimedia Commons

‘Alarming’ Climate Crisis, U.S. Paris Withdrawal Put Border Adjustment Tax Back on the Table

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
The Energy Mix - Energy Central
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}