• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
Celebrating our 1,000th edition. The climate news you need
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  FEATURED
BREAKING: U.S. Senate Passes Historic $369B Climate Package August 7, 2022
Researchers Point To ‘Dangerously Unexplored’ Risk of Global Climate Catastrophe August 2, 2022
Koch Network Pressures Manchin, Sinema as Advocates Praise ‘Game Changing’ Climate Deal August 2, 2022
Coastal GasLink Cost Skyrockets 70% to $11.2B August 2, 2022
Ottawa Releases Regulatory ‘Frame’ for Net-Zero Grid by 2035 August 2, 2022
Next
Prev

UK Research Flags Practical Problems with 4 Per 1000 Soil Carbon Initiative

February 11, 2018
Reading time: 2 minutes

Max Pixels

Max Pixels

 

France’s “4 per 1000” soil carbon initiative, unveiled with some fanfare at the 2015 United Nations climate conference in Paris, could run into “severe limitations” in its practical application, the UK’s Rothamsted Research Institute concludes in a recent paper in the journal Global Change Biology.

“It’s a bit of a scientific dream, but we have a lot of evidence that supports this dream,” Jean-Paul Moatti, CEO of the French Research Institute for Development, told SciDevNet in December 2015. The project description for 4 Pour 1,000 stated that a 0.4% annual increase in carbon stocks in the top 40 centimetres of soil, plus an end to deforestation, would be enough to offset carbon emissions from human activity.

But the Rothamsted researchers say France has been stepping back from that claim. The impetus behind the initiative was the hope “that if this rate of carbon sequestration was achieved for all soils globally to a depth of 40 centimetres, the carbon removed from the atmosphere would equal annual CO2 emissions from fossil fuels of 8.9 gigatonnes,” they write. But “later enunciations of the initiative” have been more cautious in their projections.

Based on increases in soil organic carbon in 16 long-term experiments in the southeastern UK, the researchers found that letting land lie fallow, retaining crop residues, and adding manure can indeed “increase SOC stocks, often at rates well above the 0.4% per year rate.”

However, they also identify “many situations where these practices cannot be widely adopted, either because they are impractical for farmers or because of wider global issues.” In particular, they note food security concerns that might arise on both local and global levels should too much land be set aside to sequester carbon with the express purpose of climate mitigation.

“A more logical rationale for promoting practices that increase SOC is the urgent need to preserve and improve the functioning of soils, both for sustainable food security and wider ecosystem services,” they conclude.



in Food Security, International Agencies & Studies, Soil & Natural Sequestration, UK & Europe

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

Σ64/Wikimedia Commons
Hydrogen

Global Push for Hydrogen Sidesteps Knowledge Gaps on Climate Impacts

August 11, 2022
298
Twitter
Nuclear

Shelling of Ukraine’s Zaporizhzhia Plant Raises Fears for Nuclear Safety

August 11, 2022
36
@dronewageningen/Twitter
Drought, Famine & Wildfires

Drought Cuts Water Flow on Rhine River, Could Slow Delivery of Essential Goods

August 11, 2022
51

Comments 4

  1. Stefhan Gordon says:
    4 years ago

    Please leave a link to the actual studies with the authors names. Thanks

    Reply
    • Mitchell Beer says:
      4 years ago

      Thanks, Stefhan. All our stories are linked to the original source. If you go to the top of the page and click the link for FULL STORY, you’ll get the material (or the main source, if we’ve drawn on more than one for a single post) that we used for reference.

      Reply
  2. William Grant says:
    4 years ago

    Letting fields lie fallow is only one method. There is also carbon farming, no-till agriculture, holistic rangeland management and rotational paddock grazing, This article takes one aspect and points to a problem, when the carbon soil solution is a web of methods.

    Reply
    • Nirmalya Chatterjee says:
      4 years ago

      As it is 30% of currently produced food is wasted – by FAO estimates – that is it doesn’t reach tables. Add to that many people are over-eating, which can offset the current on-table consumption of food. The net result is that the world already has the wherewithal to produce food for ~10-11 bn people. The issue has been food distribution and food habits rather than lack of food per se – and this has been the situation since the last 10-15 years.

      We really need to control our greed and wastefulness, and get on with these pretty achievable targets. There will be issues locally, seasonally and allowances will need to be made for political, social or economic diversity … but being fatalist or resigned about it is not going to serve the greater interests … and we have only one planet to live on.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Bernard Spragg/flickr

$12.3B in Profit over 3 Months as Big Fossils Reject Federal Emissions Cap

August 11, 2022
252
Σ64/Wikimedia Commons

Global Push for Hydrogen Sidesteps Knowledge Gaps on Climate Impacts

August 11, 2022
298
Protect The Planet

Trans Mountain Work Site Blocks Early Salmon Run on Coquihalla River, Local Observers Say

August 11, 2022
382
François GOGLINS/wikimedia commons

Corrosion Problem Shutters Half of France’s Nuclear Reactors

August 2, 2022
1.6k
Joseph Brent/Flickr

Green Hydrogen Will Cost Less than Fossil-Fuelled ‘Blue’, Shell CEO Admits

August 7, 2022
756
Early stages of construction on the Flamanville 3 nuclear reactor in France

Failing French Nuclear Plants Drive Up Electricity Costs as Heat Waves Cut Production

August 8, 2022
530

Recent Posts

Focus Blame for Climate Change on Fossils and Governments, Ecoanalytics Advises

August 11, 2022
125
TheKurgan/Wikipedia

Ontario Pension Giant May Be Getting the Memo on Fossil Divestment, Members Say

August 11, 2022
101
@stan_sdcollins/Twitter

Stranded Communities Hope for Emergency Food Supplies as Newfoundland Wildfires Rage

August 11, 2022
52
Maurizio Pesce/Wikimedia Commons

Tesla Lobbying Points to Ontario as Possible EV Manufacturing Site

August 11, 2022
41
MENA/Flickr

Ontario Gains from U.S. EV Tax Credit, But Plans No Incentives for Local Drivers

August 11, 2022
39
Twitter

Shelling of Ukraine’s Zaporizhzhia Plant Raises Fears for Nuclear Safety

August 11, 2022
36
Next Post
PublicDomainPictures / Pixabay

Wave of UK Subsidies Could Enable New Nuclear Development

The Energy Mix

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}