• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
  FEATURED
Thorold Gas Peaker Plant Won’t Be Built After Unanimous City Council Vote September 20, 2023
Indoor Heat Leaves Canadians Unsafe with ‘No Escape’, CBC Investigation Finds September 20, 2023
Agrivoltaics a Win-Win for Farmers, Communities, Solar Developers, and Alberta’s UCP September 20, 2023
‘Beginning of the End’ for Oil and Gas as IEA Predicts Pre-2030 Peak September 19, 2023
‘Turning Point’ for PR Industry as Clean Creatives Targets Fossil Industry Contracts September 19, 2023
Next
Prev

Why U.S. Climate Policy Can’t Be Left to the Military

February 7, 2018
Reading time: 2 minutes

U.S. Department of Defense/Flickr

U.S. Department of Defense/Flickr

 

Leaving U.S. climate change strategy up to a Department of Defense (DOD) that is hard-wired to ensure its own survival will prove catastrophic for America, and for the rest of the planet, writes veteran climate columnist David Roberts on Vox.

Such a “dystopian outcome” could be the ultimate, tragic endpoint of Donald Trump’s climate denial, he warns, because even if DOD is toning down its official reports, climate change remains on its radar as a clear and present danger.

  • Be among the first to read The Energy Mix Weekender
  • A brand new weekly digest containing exclusive and essential climate stories from around the world.
  • The Weekender:The climate news you need.
Subscribe

“Unlike its Commander in Chief, [the military] is not involved in a reality show,” he notes. “It has to deal with actual reality.”

Citing retired admiral James Stavridis, now dean of the Tufts University Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Roberts says that reality is daunting: water scarcity “will drive dislocation and conflict”, naval bases will be threatened by rising sea levels, a melting Arctic will “open new areas of geopolitical conflict”, and the military budget will be strained by “the rising cost of climate impacts”.

It isn’t that concern about climate change is anything new for the military: Trump Defense Secretary James Mattis, who fought in the Iraq War and has since been an outspoken advocate for weaning the U.S. military off fossil fuels, warned the Senate Armed Services Committee that “climate change is impacting stability in areas of the world where our troops are operating today.” Such comments, Roberts notes, have “led some to view Mattis, and by extension the DOD, as the lone ‘green hope’ in the Trump administration.”

But that optimism is misplaced, he says: while some may be looking to the military to show leadership on mitigation, the armed forces are “overwhelmingly focused on adaptation—preparing for the changes on the way, maintaining readiness, and allocating resources accordingly.” That’s “as it should be,” Roberts contends, because “the military is not the right tool for mitigation, for economy-wide decarbonization.”

That “right tool,” he adds, would be an administration that recognized climate change as an existential threat to the present and future of the American people and understood that “mitigation protects everyone (at least to some extent), while adaptation only protects those who adapt.”

That the Trump administration is AWOL on climate action means that “an all-adaptation, no-mitigation climate approach” may increasingly dictate American responses to climate change. Such a situation may well appeal, Roberts notes, to “the sort of conservative who mistakes callous myopia for realpolitik.” That’s because “with all its advantages…America could prosper in an increasingly chaotic world, at least for a while.”

But in the long term, “as things get worse, those who can afford to protect themselves—move their military bases, build sea walls and desalination plants, claim newly navigable land in the Arctic—will pull farther and farther away from those who can’t (the global poor, who did so little to cause the problem),” he notes. In the end, “such a strategy would be disastrous, dramatically and continuously exacerbating existing inequalities.



in Arctic & Antarctica, Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise, International Security & War, Severe Storms & Flooding, United States

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

Rewat Wannasuk/Pexels
Heat & Power

Virtual Power Plants Could Cut Peak Demand 20%, Save U.S. Grid $10B Per Year

September 20, 2023
1
Wesley Fryer/flickr
Demand & Efficiency

Smart Thermostats Boost Grid Stability Amid Intense Heat

September 20, 2023
1
Cullen328/wikimedia commons
Buildings & Infrastructure

Manufactured Housing Could Dent the Affordable Housing Crunch with Energy-Efficient Designs

September 20, 2023
1

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Jon Sullivan/flickr

Thorold Gas Peaker Plant Won’t Be Built After Unanimous City Council Vote

September 20, 2023
334
/Piqusels

‘Beginning of the End’ for Oil and Gas as IEA Predicts Pre-2030 Peak

September 19, 2023
356
Clean Creatives

‘Turning Point’ for PR Industry as Clean Creatives Targets Fossil Industry Contracts

September 19, 2023
233
William Munoz/Flickr

‘Obituary-Changing’ Revelations Show Exxon’s Tillerson Undermining Climate Science

September 19, 2023
186
HiMY SYeD/flick

Ontario Waits 8 Months to Release Dire Climate Impact Report

September 14, 2023
486
Beckyq6937/Wikimedia Commons

Solar Geoengineering Means ‘Game Over’ for Life on Earth, Critics Warn

September 19, 2023
97

Recent Posts

Rewat Wannasuk/Pexels

Virtual Power Plants Could Cut Peak Demand 20%, Save U.S. Grid $10B Per Year

September 20, 2023
1
Jeremy Bezanger/Unsplash

Indoor Heat Leaves Canadians Unsafe with ‘No Escape’, CBC Investigation Finds

September 20, 2023
1
Wesley Fryer/flickr

Smart Thermostats Boost Grid Stability Amid Intense Heat

September 20, 2023
1
Cullen328/wikimedia commons

Manufactured Housing Could Dent the Affordable Housing Crunch with Energy-Efficient Designs

September 20, 2023
1
Mr Renewables/Wikipedia

Californians Fight for Approval of New Community Solar Plan

September 20, 2023
2
Asurnipal/wikimedia commons

Agrivoltaics a Win-Win for Farmers, Communities, Solar Developers, and Alberta’s UCP

September 20, 2023
1
Next Post
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Polar_Bear_AdF.jpg

Beaufort Polar Bear Diets Threatened by Shrinking Sea Ice

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
The Energy Mix - Energy Central
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}