• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
  FEATURED
‘Huge Loss’ for Local Green Economy as Vancouver Shutters Its Economic Commission September 28, 2023
Leading Climate Models Underestimate Clean Energy Progress, Overstate Cost, Study Finds September 28, 2023
Green Space Groups Gear for Bigger Fights After Ontario Reverses Greenbelt Land Grab September 28, 2023
Put Lower-Income Households First in Line for Low-Carbon Technologies: Samson September 28, 2023
Fossil Fuels Fall 25% by 2030, Renewables ‘Keep the Path Open’ in IEA Net-Zero Update September 26, 2023
Next
Prev

‘Existential’ Climate Threat Could Mean Putting Other Priorities Second

January 31, 2018
Reading time: 4 minutes

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnox

Wikipedia

 

Can a true climate hawk learn to love a nuclear power plant? Or if not, at least tolerate it? Veteran climate reporter David Roberts puts that provocative question forward in a recent column on Vox.

Roberts’ premise is one that no climate hawk—and no candid reader of the science—can deny: human disruption of the stable climate that allowed humanity to emerge now threatens our species’ future survival. “Serious damages are already under way, there’s enough carbon dioxide in the atmosphere to ensure more damages to come, and if carbon emissions continue unchecked, species-threatening damages become a non-trivial risk,” he writes.

  • Be among the first to read The Energy Mix Weekender
  • A brand new weekly digest containing exclusive and essential climate stories from around the world.
  • The Weekender:The climate news you need.
Subscribe

“Existential” threats are those that put every other kind in the shade, he adds: If we don’t solve them, we won’t have to worry about the others. But Roberts contends that many self-styled climate hawks—and less hawkish supporters of climate action in the broader environmental community—too often lose sight of that priority.

As his lead example, he cites a debate currently raging in New England, where the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant—the last operating nuclear station in Massachusetts—is set to close next year.

The Massachusetts chapter of the Sierra Club—a group that explicitly recognizes climate change as an “existential” threat—welcomed the decision, after lobbying for the plant’s closure, Roberts notes.

But the shutdown will leave a 690-megawatt hole in New England’s power supply, about 4.1% of the total. One way to fill it would be to complete a proposed transmission line to import hydro power from Quebec.

“That would replace the lost Pilgrim energy and add more carbon-free energy to boot,” Roberts observes. But Sierra Club Massachusetts “opposes that, too,” citing “ecological destruction on a massive scale” and “exploitation of the Indigenous people of Canada.”

Roberts’ nuclear example may wander into some deep grass. While the Pilgrim nuclear plant churns out zero-carbon electricity now, it’s not clear that his comparisons include the inevitable cost of decommissioning the station. His assertions that even if New England “was covered in solar panels, that energy would be replacing the energy lost from Pilgrim, [and] would have to be backed up by lots of natural gas (or oil),” appear casual in the first case, and in the second strangely dismissive of the tumbling cost of utility-scale renewables+storage.

“Yesterday’s announcement of a deal for 17% of Massachusetts’ electricity for 20 years makes it hard to agree with Roberts that there is an impasse between climate objectives and environmental positions”, Sierra Club’s Ohio-based energy advisor Ned Ford told The Mix, in an e-mail response to the Vox post. Sierra Club has long opposed expansion of hydro, he added, but “New England environmentalists have been working on RGGI [the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative] for some years now, and the conflicts are real, but hardly insurmountable.”

The region “does have adequate wind and solar resources to provide all the power they need, at or below current costs,” Ford added. “It may be that Quebec hydropower is cheaper, but those power lines are going to be expensive. Wind and solar will need transmission, too, but it is unlikely that they will need as large lines for nearly as many miles.”

Ford also pointed to an issue he says Roberts is sidestepping: That keeping a nuclear power plant in operation leads to higher costs. “FirstEnergy in Ohio is seeking a $200-million-per-year increase in rates,” or about five to 10% on power bills, to cover “a much larger proportional increase in the cost of the nuclear resource,” he said.

Still, Roberts’ broader argument bears reflection. If zero-carbon electrification is to be achieved at all—let alone on the urgent schedule implied by the onset of climate instability—transmission corridors from regions of surplus production to those of high demand may be “existential” necessities.

“It’s fine if an individual or group chooses to prioritize rivers in Quebec or the safety risks of existing nuclear power plants over the threat of climate change,” Roberts stresses. “People are entitled to their own values and priorities. But an individual or group should not do so while also proclaiming climate change an existential threat.”

“By doing so they are deceiving themselves. There are trade-offs among priorities, and eschewing 9.45 terawatt-hours of carbon-free energy is a big-ass trade-off.”

There are good arguments against building additional nuclear stations, Roberts concedes. “But it is difficult to think of a plausible climate-based argument against the ones that are already built, running, and paid off. They are generating carbon-free power, and we need all the carbon-free power we can get.”

He adds that “the wealthy developed world is filled with liberals and environmentalists who are perfectly willing to drive a Prius and buy organic veggies but raise holy hell if anyone tries to build a bike lane, light rail station, or new housing anywhere near them. It’s one thing to go to the occasional march, but giving up on-street parking? Let’s be serious.”

For climate advocates of all stripes, Roberts sees tough choices ahead.

“Conservative climate hawks may have to tolerate climate solutions that involve heavy government intervention. Farmer climate hawks may have to tolerate swaths of their land being claimed for transmission lines or wind turbines. Wealthy climate hawks may have to tolerate restrictions on their consumer purchases or airline travel. Environmentalist climate hawks may have to tolerate large-scale carbon sequestration or new rivers given over to dams. And so on.

“That’s what ‘crisis’ means. It’s what ‘existential’ means.”



in Canada, Climate Denial & Greenwashing, Ending Emissions, General Renewables, Heat & Power, Hydropower, Nuclear, Sub-National Governments, United States

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

Iota 9/Wikimedia Commons
Cities & Communities

‘Huge Loss’ for Local Green Economy as Vancouver Shutters Its Economic Commission

September 28, 2023
1
Solarimo/pixabay
Ending Emissions

Leading Climate Models Underestimate Clean Energy Progress, Overstate Cost, Study Finds

September 28, 2023
2
Duffins Agriculture Preserve/North Country House Media via Greenbelt Foundation
Ontario

Green Space Groups Gear for Bigger Fights After Ontario Reverses Greenbelt Land Grab

September 28, 2023
151

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Cullen328/wikimedia commons

Manufactured Housing Could Dent the Affordable Housing Crunch with Energy-Efficient Designs

September 20, 2023
622
Mark Dixon/wikimedia commons

Hundreds of Thousands March in Global Climate Strike

September 19, 2023
211
Jon Sullivan/flickr

Thorold Gas Peaker Plant Won’t Be Built After Unanimous City Council Vote

September 21, 2023
749
Jason Blackeye/Unsplash

Fossil Fuels Fall 25% by 2030, Renewables ‘Keep the Path Open’ in IEA Net-Zero Update

September 28, 2023
403
/Piqusels

‘Beginning of the End’ for Oil and Gas as IEA Predicts Pre-2030 Peak

September 19, 2023
845
Duffins Agriculture Preserve/North Country House Media via Greenbelt Foundation

Green Space Groups Gear for Bigger Fights After Ontario Reverses Greenbelt Land Grab

September 28, 2023
151

Recent Posts

Iota 9/Wikimedia Commons

‘Huge Loss’ for Local Green Economy as Vancouver Shutters Its Economic Commission

September 28, 2023
1
Solarimo/pixabay

Leading Climate Models Underestimate Clean Energy Progress, Overstate Cost, Study Finds

September 28, 2023
2
DiscoverEganville/wikimedia commons

EV Rentals to Improve Transportation Access for Ontario Townships

September 28, 2023
1
shopblocks/flickr

E-Bikes, Scooters Overwhelm Toronto Bike Lanes

September 28, 2023
2
kelly8843496 / Pixabay

Put Lower-Income Households First in Line for Low-Carbon Technologies: Samson

September 28, 2023
2
Power lines, Mississauga, Canada

Two First Nations Groups Vie to Build Northern Ontario Power Line

September 28, 2023
111
Next Post
jasonwoodhead23/Flickr

Montney, Duvernay Oil and Gas Fields Seize the Momentum from Athabasca Tar Sands/Oil Sands

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
The Energy Mix - Energy Central
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}