• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
BREAKING: Federal Budget Pours Tens of Billions Into Clean Economy March 28, 2023
Somali Canadians Aid Drought-Stricken Homeland as 43,000 Reported Dead March 26, 2023
B.C.’s New Energy Framework a ‘Smokescreen,’ Critic Warns March 26, 2023
SPECIAL REPORT: ‘Defuse the Climate Time Bomb’ with Net-Zero by 2040, Guterres Urges G20 March 20, 2023
Devastating Impacts, Affordable Climate Solutions Drive IPCC’s Urgent Call for Action March 20, 2023
Next
Prev

Koch Brothers Finance Publisher to Buy Time Magazine, People, Sports Illustrated, Fortune, and More

November 28, 2017
Reading time: 3 minutes

Tony Fischer/Flickr

Tony Fischer/Flickr

 

The fossil-fuelled Koch brothers are tightening their grip on public conversation in the United States by helping an intermediary acquire Time magazine as part of a US$1.84-billion deal.

Reuters describes the purchase as “a coup” for Des Moines, Iowa-based, Meredith Corporation, which already publishes Better Homes & Gardens and Family Circle and has been trying to acquire New York City-based Time’s publishing assets since 2013. In addition to the iconic weekly newsmagazine, Meredith will get People, Sports Illustrated, and Fortune, among other titles.

  • Concise headlines. Original content. Timely news and views from a select group of opinion leaders. Special extras.
  • Everything you need, nothing you don’t.
  • The Weekender: The climate news you need.
Subscribe

“When combined,” Reuters writes, “the Meredith and Time brands will have a readership of 135 million people and paid circulation of nearly 60 million. The deal also will expand Meredith’s reach with Internet-savvy millennials, creating a digital media business with 170 million monthly unique visitors in the United States.”

Koch Equity Development, the brothers’ private equity arm, plowed $650 million into Meredith to make the purchase possible.

Charles and David Koch have spent millions to influence the United States’ political conversation and legislation. They “previously expressed interest in buying media properties such as the Los Angeles Times and the Chicago Tribune,” Reuters notes. Koch Equity and Meredith “said the Koch unit will not have a seat on Meredith’s board and will have no influence on Meredith’s editorial or managerial operations,” the news agency reports.

According to the New York Times, Koch spokesperson Steve Lombardo cast the transaction as “a passive financial investment made through our equity development arm.” The Koch brothers themselves “had no plans to take an active role in the expanded company,” the paper wrote, citing Lombardo. “The company’s role in the transaction, [Lombardo] said, was similar to that of a bank.”

Few in the climate movement were persuaded by the denial. “It’s a cheap way to wield even more political influence,” 350.org founder Bill McKibben told the Guardian. “The return on investment on their political work is off the charts, I fear.”

Former Time science editor Charles Alexander said he was worried by the Koch brothers’ “systematic denial of the science underlying climate change,” which he believed “presaged a larger skepticism of science and facts in general.”

Scott Peterson, speaking for media watchdog Checks and Balances Project, also warned against being misled by the brothers’ apparently arms-length acquisition. The Kochs, Peterson told the Guardian, don’t give money to any group without strings attached. “I would find it kind of surprising if the Kochs simply made a quiet investment and then went on their way and watched their stock,” he said.

“The only way they can convince the public not to worry their heads about climate change and to forget about regulating the fossil fuel industry,” added the Center for Media and Democracy’s Mary Bottari, “is to create their own media megaphone.”

That megaphone may not be a cheerleader for Donald Trump (recently embroiled in a Twitter war with Time over whether he was—or was not—“probably” going to be named its Person of the Year).

Rather, the Guardian notes, the Kochs have directed more “traceable” money to U.S. Vice President Mike Pence—the man who would become president if Trump were removed—than to any other candidate. Pence “did the Kochs a valuable political favour in the spring of 2009,” when he helped to kill a carbon cap-and-trade initiative in the U.S. Congress.



in Climate Denial & Greenwashing, Community Climate Finance, Energy Politics, Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion, United States

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

kelly8843496 / Pixabay
Finance & Investment

BREAKING: Federal Budget Pours Tens of Billions Into Clean Economy

March 29, 2023
680
TruckPR/flickr
Hydrogen

Opinion: Hydrogen Hype Sabotages Potential to Decarbonize

March 28, 2023
385
UNICEF Ethiopia/flickr
Drought, Famine & Wildfires

Somali Canadians Aid Drought-Stricken Homeland as 43,000 Reported Dead

March 29, 2023
41

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

kelly8843496 / Pixabay

BREAKING: Federal Budget Pours Tens of Billions Into Clean Economy

March 29, 2023
680
Faye Cornish/Unsplash

Abundance, Not Austerity: Reframe the Climate Narrative, Solnit Urges

March 26, 2023
166
TruckPR/flickr

Opinion: Hydrogen Hype Sabotages Potential to Decarbonize

March 28, 2023
385
U.S. Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement/flickr

Willow Oil Project in Alaska Faces Legal Challenges, Economic Doubts

March 19, 2023
769
Bruce Reeve/Flickr

Ontario Faces Multi-Million Dollar Lawsuits Over Cancelled Carbon Pricing Program

May 14, 2022
205
moerschy / Pixabay

Fringe Conspiracy Theories Target 15-Minute City Push in Edmonton, Toronto

February 22, 2023
1.8k

Recent Posts

icondigital/pixabay

New Federal Procurement Rule Requires Biggest Bidders to Report Net-Zero Plans

March 28, 2023
188
UNICEF Ethiopia/flickr

Somali Canadians Aid Drought-Stricken Homeland as 43,000 Reported Dead

March 29, 2023
41
Σ64/Wikimedia Commons

B.C.’s New Energy Framework a ‘Smokescreen,’ Critic Warns

March 28, 2023
64
Prime Minister's Office/flickr

Biden’s Ottawa Visit Highlights EVs, Clean Grid, Critical Minerals

March 28, 2023
89
EUMETSAT/wikimedia commons

Cyclone Freddy Leaves Over 500 Dead on Africa’s Southeast Coast

March 23, 2023
63
Kern River Valley Fire Info/Facebook

SPECIAL REPORT: ‘Defuse the Climate Time Bomb’ with Net-Zero by 2040, Guterres Urges G20

March 20, 2023
342
Next Post
Wtshymanski/Wikimedia Commons

Saskatchewan Faces Tough Decision on Costly Boundary Dam CCS Plant

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}