• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
Celebrating our 1,000th edition. The climate news you need
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  FEATURED
Soaring Fertilizer Prices Could Deliver ‘Silver Lining’ For Emissions, But Farmers Struggle to Limit Use June 26, 2022
BREAKING: UN Nature Summit, the ‘Paris Conference for Biodiversity’, Moves to Montreal in December June 19, 2022
‘LET’S SUE BIG OIL’: Legal Team Launches Class Action Campaign for B.C. Municipalities June 17, 2022
‘It Could Have Been Any of Us’, Colleague Says, After Brazil Confirms Murders of Bruno Pereira, Dom Phillips June 17, 2022
Infrastructure Gap a ‘Life and Death’ Matter as Northern Canada Warms June 17, 2022
Next
Prev
Home Climate & Society Energy / Carbon Pricing & Economics

IEA’s 2017 Energy Outlook Stays Loyal to Fossils Through 2040

November 15, 2017
Reading time: 4 minutes

Department of Energy/Flickr

Department of Energy/Flickr

 

The International Energy Agency and its executive director Fatih Birol remain among fossil fuels’ biggest fans, predicting continued growth in global demand for oil through 2040 even as the organization’s 2017 World Energy Outlook acknowledges that such a reality would escalate the risk of climate catastrophe.

“It is far too early to write the obituary of oil, as growth for trucks, aviation, petrochemicals, shipping, and aviation keep pushing demand higher,” Birol said in a statement accompanying the agency’s forecast that fossil fuels will continue to supply 75% of the economy’s overall energy demand by 2040, down fractionally from 81% last year.

Energy demand falls in Europe and North America, but rises elsewhere, in the IEA’s primary energy future scenario. Total global consumption will “rise more slowly than in the past but still expand by 30% between today and 2040,” it predicts. “This is the equivalent of adding another China and India to today’s global demand.”

The agency premised its forecast on “a global economy growing at an average rate of 3.4% per year, a population that expands from 7.4 billion today to more than nine billion in 2040, and a process of urbanization that adds a city the size of Shanghai to the world’s urban population every four months.”

Its scenario is strikingly at odds with the warning recently voiced by 15,000 earth and environmental scientists that most of the critical natural systems supporting that anticipated growth are nearing collapse.

Nonetheless the agency—which has faced criticism in the past for persistently underestimating growth in non-fossil energy sources—anticipates demand for oil and gas will continue rising for the next 22 years. Its Outlook foresees “a continued large-scale need for investment to develop a total of 670 billion barrels of new [oil] resources” by then.

Other organizations, taking account of the climate implications of burning that much more oil, have warned that companies may end up wasting between US$1 and $6 trillion if they continue on the investment course the IEA foresees, and governments demonstrate sincerity in enacting carbon constraints compatible with keeping global warming below 2.0ºC.

Meanwhile, the IEA expects renewable energy sources—led by photovoltaic solar—to “capture two-thirds of global investment in power plants to 2040, as they become, for many countries, the least-cost source of new generation.”

The advance is particularly marked in the European Union, where “renewables account for 80% of new capacity, and wind power becomes the leading source of electricity soon after 2030, due to strong growth both onshore and offshore.”

Petroleum gas consolidates its position as a putative “off-ramp” from coal and oil in the IEA’s “Sustainable Development Scenario.” Consumption rises by nearly 20% to 2030 and stays “broadly at this level” for the next decade.

In a glimmer of hope for advocates of gas exports from British Columbia, the agency predicts the number of “liquefaction sites worldwide [will] double to 2040, with the main additions coming from the United States and Australia, followed by Russia, Qatar, Mozambique, and Canada.”

Any potential environmental benefits from burning gas instead of even dirtier fossils will be lost, however, unless “credible action” is taken “to minimize leaks of methane—a potent greenhouse gas—to the atmosphere,” the IEA warns.

The agency views such action as feasible, and claims to have conducted “the first global analysis of the costs of abating the estimated 76 million tonnes of methane emitted worldwide each year in oil and gas operations.” It finds that up to half of those emissions “can be mitigated at no net cost, because the value of the captured methane could cover the abatement measures.”

Even if that occurs however, “global energy-related CO2 emissions increase slightly,” under the EIA’s core scenario, reaching 35.7 gigatons of CO2 in 2040—a prospect the agency concedes “is far from enough to avoid severe impacts of climate change.”

American media coverage of the Outlook focused on its finding that the United States will become the world’s biggest exporter of oil and gas within a decade, driven by burgeoning output from shale beds unlocked by hydro-fracking.

“The U.S. becomes the undisputed leader for oil and gas production for decades, which represents a major upheaval for international market dynamics,” Birol’s statement noted. News outlets in the U.S. mostly read that as support for the Trump regime’s aggressive ambition to achieve global “energy dominance” over other nations.

By 2030, the New York Times observed, “the United States is expected to produce more than 30 million barrels of oil and gas a day, the report says. That is 50% more than any other country has ever produced in a single year.”

That gusher of hydrocarbons, the IEA says, is also forcing the world to accept a disruptive new “mindset about how gas markets should operate,” adopting free-wheeling purchases in real-time market exchanges over long-term, fixed-price contracts. That development, the IEA authors write, will “reorder international trade flows and challenge incumbent suppliers and business models.”



in Energy / Carbon Pricing & Economics

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

David/flickr
United States

U.S. Supreme Court Expected to Gut Emission Controls as Climate Scientists Petition for Plan B

June 26, 2022
1
Graco/Facebook
Food Security

Soaring Fertilizer Prices Could Deliver ‘Silver Lining’ For Emissions, But Farmers Struggle to Limit Use

June 27, 2022
2
willenhallwench / Pixabay
Clean Electricity Grid

PG&E Risks Greenwashing with Definition of ‘Scope 4’ Emissions

June 24, 2022
50

Comments 3

  1. Peter Sircom Bromley says:
    5 years ago

    The IEA’s predictions are, like all predictions, based on certain assumptions, and in this case are only one point along a continuum of probabilities regarding energy demand – which itself cannot be predicted. The task is to work toward ending demand by phasing out the machines that burn fossil fuels as quickly as possible.

    So maybe it’s better not to dwell on predictions regarding energy demand. Obviously, the assumptions upon which they are based have to change.

    Reply
    • Mitchell Beer says:
      5 years ago

      Absolutely. The IEA itself insists that it produces model results, not predictions. The problem is that those results are invariably *taken* as predictions by investors, private and public sector decision-makers, and media. So the agency really needs to get more careful and clear about aligning its non-predictions with the pathways countries have committed to under the Paris Agreement, make *that* the baseline scenario, then project added ambition (or less ambition, since it’s a big assumption that governments will all keep their promises) from there.

      Reply
  2. Peter Sircom Bromley says:
    5 years ago

    This raises another dubious assumption; the degree to which national governments have direct or substantial effect on energy transition and biosphere restoration, and therefore any reliable way to live up to their commitments.

    We need to look for commitments elsewhere, closer to the source, so to speak. For example, according to IEA projections, the automotive sector will fill the planet with some 2 billion automobiles by 2040 – which is about double the current number. Whether all those vehicles will get built and are equipped with ICEs or electric motors is, finally, a matter of corporate policy. Same goes for the electricity sector.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

The federal government's Cliff Street Power Plant is at the centre of Ottawa's plans to reduce natural gas demand. Photo: PWGSC

EXCLUSIVE: Ontario Regulator Refuses New Pipeline, Tells Enbridge to Plan for Lower Gas Demand

May 30, 2022
5.2k
Jason Woodhead/Flickr

Trans Mountain Pipeline On Track to Lose $600 Million, Parliamentary Budget Officer Finds

June 24, 2022
341
Ben_Kerckx/Pixabay

Plastics Cited as ‘Fossil Industry’s Plan B’ as Guilbeault Announces Partial Ban

June 24, 2022
219
Bruce Reeve/Flickr

Opinion: Ontario’s New ‘Carbon Tax’ Looks Like the One Doug Ford Fought

June 7, 2022
1.6k
eloialferez66/pixnio

Toronto’s New Backyard Homes Will Help Fight Sprawl

June 24, 2022
70
Greg Goebel/Wikimedia Commons

Canadian Pension Board Invests $141M in Chinese Coal Projects, Undercutting Federal Phaseout Policy

July 29, 2020
2.3k

Recent Posts

David/flickr

U.S. Supreme Court Expected to Gut Emission Controls as Climate Scientists Petition for Plan B

June 26, 2022
1
pxhere

Environmental Racism Bill Passes Second Reading in House of Commons

June 26, 2022
1
Graco/Facebook

Soaring Fertilizer Prices Could Deliver ‘Silver Lining’ For Emissions, But Farmers Struggle to Limit Use

June 26, 2022
2
stockvault

Animal Agriculture Could Reduce Future Pandemic Risk, UK Researchers Say

June 26, 2022
1
Gustavo Petro Urrego/flickr

Colombia’s President-Elect Has ‘Ambitious’ Plans to Halt Amazon Deforestation

June 26, 2022
1
Adam E. Moreira/wikimedia commons

Suspend Transit Fares, Not Gas Tax, Climate Advocates Urge Biden

June 26, 2022
1
Next Post
Dawn Ellner/flickr

Return to Rising CO2 Emissions a ‘Flashing Red Light’ For Climate

The Energy Mix

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}