• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
SPECIAL REPORT: ‘Defuse the Climate Time Bomb’ with Net-Zero by 2040, Guterres Urges G20 March 20, 2023
Devastating Impacts, Affordable Climate Solutions Drive IPCC’s Urgent Call for Action March 20, 2023
Window for 1.5°C ‘Rapidly Closing’, IPCC Warns March 20, 2023
Swift Action, Inclusive Resilience Vital in Face of Overlapping Climate Hazards March 20, 2023
Shift from Fossils to Renewables is Quickest, Cheapest Path to Cut Emissions, IPCC Report Shows March 20, 2023
Next
Prev

Companies in Lac-Mégantic Disaster Overlooked Excess Weight, Smoking Engine, Faulty Documents

October 31, 2017
Reading time: 2 minutes

Sûreté du Québec/Wikimedia Commons

Sûreté du Québec/Wikimedia Commons

 

A trial in one case arising from the derailment and explosion of a runaway oil train in 2013 that killed 47 people and incinerated downtown Lac-Mégantic, Quebec, and the conclusion of another, have revealed chronic corporate negligence on the part of both the now-bankrupt rail line, and the owner of the oil it was carrying.

In testimony unsealed last week, a former locomotive engineer for the Montreal, Maine and Atlantic Railway (MMA) revealed that his employer forbade him from refusing to operate a train “even when he knew it was over the maximum allowed weight,” CBC News reports.

  • The climate news you need. Subscribe now to our engaging new weekly digest.
  • You’ll receive exclusive, never-before-seen-content, distilled and delivered to your inbox every weekend.
  • The Weekender: Succinct, solutions-focused, and designed with the discerning reader in mind.
Subscribe

Other testimony established that the maximum weight allowed by official manuals for an MMA train at the time of the derailment was 6,300 tonnes. The train that derailed weighed 9,100 tonnes—more than 44% more than the manual permitted.

François Daigle drove the same route with a similar train to the one that escaped its brakes and exploded just days earlier. He “told the court it was common practice for the company’s top management to play loose with established railway regulations,” CBC reports.

MMA was also tight-fisted with its maintenance, Daigle testified.

“A lot of locomotives were reported several times, but nothing was ever done,” he told the court. He had driven the locomotive involved in the catastrophe just two days earlier, and noticed that it “kept losing speed and produced black smoke.” When he reported the problem to the company’s repair shop at the end of his shift, he was scolded for “complaining” and told, “this is what we have.”

An emotional Daigle was testifying in the trial of fellow engineer Thomas Harding, operations manager Jean Demaitre, and controller Richard Labrie. The men, all in their 50s, are each charged with 47 counts of criminal negligence causing death.

Coincidentally, Irving Oil was ordered last week to pay $4 million after pleading guilty to 34 counts of failing to follow appropriate safety procedures stemming from a joint Transport Canada-RCMP investigation into the disaster.

“The investigation revealed that Irving Oil had not complied with all applicable safety requirements by not classifying the crude oil being carried by trains as a dangerous good,” the Globe and Mail reports. “In addition, the shipping documents onboard the trains were incorrect.” According to Transport Canada, Irving also failed to train its employees adequately in the transportation of dangerous goods.

In the wake of the disaster, Canada banned the type of rail car involved in the accident. But a U.S. Department of Transportation audit initiated after the disaster concluded that regulators had “no overall understanding of the national risk environment” from the rail transport of hazardous goods in that country. Canada’s and America’s rail networks are closely integrated, with the same cars, trains, and crews often operating in both countries.



in Canada, Health & Safety, Legal & Regulatory, Pipelines / Rail Transport

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

EUMETSAT/wikimedia commons
Severe Storms & Flooding

Cyclone Freddy Leaves Over 500 Dead on Africa’s Southeast Coast

March 23, 2023
31
IFRC Intl. Federation:Twitter
International Agencies & Studies

Devastating Impacts, Affordable Climate Solutions Drive IPCC’s Urgent Call for Action

March 21, 2023
865
FMSC/Flickr
Environmental Justice

Swift Action, Inclusive Resilience Vital in Face of Overlapping Climate Hazards

March 20, 2023
74

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

IFRC Intl. Federation:Twitter

Devastating Impacts, Affordable Climate Solutions Drive IPCC’s Urgent Call for Action

March 21, 2023
865
U.S. Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement/flickr

Willow Oil Project in Alaska Faces Legal Challenges, Economic Doubts

March 19, 2023
592
EUMETSAT/wikimedia commons

Cyclone Freddy Leaves Over 500 Dead on Africa’s Southeast Coast

March 23, 2023
31
NTSB

Ohio Train Derailment, Toxic Chemical Spill Renews Fears Over Canada-U.S. Rail Safety

March 8, 2023
1.5k
EcoFlight

Historic Deal Reopens B.C. Indigenous Territory to Fracking, Promises Land Restoration

March 19, 2023
466
Kern River Valley Fire Info/Facebook

SPECIAL REPORT: ‘Defuse the Climate Time Bomb’ with Net-Zero by 2040, Guterres Urges G20

March 20, 2023
282

Recent Posts

U.S. National Park Service/rawpixel

Window for 1.5°C ‘Rapidly Closing’, IPCC Warns

March 20, 2023
80
FMSC/Flickr

Swift Action, Inclusive Resilience Vital in Face of Overlapping Climate Hazards

March 20, 2023
74
Kenuoene/pixabay

Shift from Fossils to Renewables is Quickest, Cheapest Path to Cut Emissions, IPCC Report Shows

March 20, 2023
227
Secretariat of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine/Wikimedia Commons

IPCC Report Charts a Course for Ottawa’s ‘Clean Technology’ Budget

March 23, 2023
163
Kiara Worth, UNClimateChange/flickr

Gap Between IPCC’s Science, National Actions Sets Challenge for COP 28

March 21, 2023
85
Photo by IISD/ENB

IPCC Sees Deeper Risk in Overshooting 1.5°C Warming Threshold

March 20, 2023
52
Next Post
jasonwoodhead23/flickr

CAPP Threatens Job Losses If Ottawa Doesn’t Accept Its Methane Reduction Plan

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}